If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting
stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. For example there are many newsletters that are no longer printing, but rather emailing their papers. The day for print to vanish will probably never ever come. But who knows. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org "The president didn't go into Iraq because the polls told him it was popular. As a matter of fact, the polls said just the opposite. But leadership isn't about polls. It's about making decisions you think are right and then standing behind those decisions. That's why America is safer with George W. Bush as president" (Arnold Schwarzenegger, 2004). Matthew 7:12 Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets. Luke 9:23 Then he said to them all: If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
"Big Brother" wrote in message
r.org... I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. For example there are many newsletters that are no longer printing, but rather emailing their papers. The day for print to vanish will probably never ever come. But who knows. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org "The president didn't go into Iraq because the polls told him it was popular. As a matter of fact, the polls said just the opposite. But leadership isn't about polls. It's about making decisions you think are right and then standing behind those decisions. That's why America is safer with George W. Bush as president" (Arnold Schwarzenegger, 2004). Matthew 7:12 Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets. Luke 9:23 Then he said to them all: If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. Higher mp cameras give room for cropping. Looking at the pictures at 1:1 on screen, my 2mp and earlier cameras looked a bit soft. In adition to the higher mp, the images are a bit sharper too. -S |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
Big Brother wrote:
I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. For example there are many newsletters that are no longer printing, but rather emailing their papers. The day for print to vanish will probably never ever come. But who knows. John That wont happen till we have super high resolution displays. When we get to 4000 x 3000 displays we'll need more than 2MP :-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
Big Brother wrote:
I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. For example there are many newsletters that are no longer printing, but rather emailing their papers. The day for print to vanish will probably never ever come. But who knows. Seems like a bit of an odd way of looking at things. You seem to believe that the camera market is driven by what publishers need, but the vast majority of cameras are sold to people who will never see a photo published and are only taking photos from themselves. People clearly like the extra resolution and if you ever plan to make prints larger then 4x6 you will need a camera with more then 2MP. And in fact a 4 x 6 print from a 5MP will be visibly sharper then a 4 x 6 print from a 2 MP camera. Even it you don't make a print a 2MP camera is marginal for displaying full screen and it will get worse as monitors continue to increase in resolution. Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
Scott W wrote:
Big Brother wrote: I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. For example there are many newsletters that are no longer printing, but rather emailing their papers. The day for print to vanish will probably never ever come. But who knows. Seems like a bit of an odd way of looking at things. Well, that's what he does, and then posts about it. And then folks jump in, a hassle ensues, and then he morphs into something else and starts all over again. He's been doing it in comp.mac. groups for years, has dozens of names. oh, yeah, and will soon assert he's perseucted or stalked. -- John McWilliams |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
"John McWilliams" wrote in message ... Scott W wrote: Big Brother wrote: I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. For example there are many newsletters that are no longer printing, but rather emailing their papers. The day for print to vanish will probably never ever come. But who knows. Seems like a bit of an odd way of looking at things. Well, that's what he does, and then posts about it. And then folks jump in, a hassle ensues, and then he morphs into something else and starts all over again. He's been doing it in comp.mac. groups for years, has dozens of names. oh, yeah, and will soon assert he's perseucted or stalked. -- John McWilliams Oh, so you meant that WE'VE BEEN TROLLED??? Jeez, where do those guys come from? They should all get a life. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:08:55 -0600, Don Stauffer
wrote: Big Brother wrote: I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. For example there are many newsletters that are no longer printing, but rather emailing their papers. The day for print to vanish will probably never ever come. But who knows. John That wont happen till we have super high resolution displays. When we get to 4000 x 3000 displays we'll need more than 2MP :-) My display goes to something like 2500x1400 now. That means 4 meg. -Rich |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
Big Brother wrote:
I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. I primarily use my digicam to make shots for web page use. I'm already there. BugBear |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
"bugbear" wrote in message ... Big Brother wrote: I think eventually when most companies stop printing and start posting stuff online, there wont be a need for these High MP cameras any longer. I primarily use my digicam to make shots for web page use. I'm already there. BugBear Ditto. Both my 5MP cameras are quite sufficient resolution for all my requirements. My photos are exclusively used for:- a) Viewing on a computer monitor (max 1600 x 1200 resolution). b) Uploading to websites and online photo albums. c) Repoduction in books and magazines (maximum A4 size). d) Occasional printing at 6" x 4" size max. The most demanding of the requirements is when my photographs are used in publications, and even then I've had 3MP pictures (from an earlier camera) reproduced quite acceptably fullpage in glossy A4 colour publications. Zorba |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras
The problem is that most 2mp cameras are now junk, plastic lenses etc.
My first digital camera was a Fuji 1400, not the sturdiest thing but had a good sensor, I reallt liked the images. So I bought my son a Fuji 3mp model, awful pics, over contrasty over saturated, and no menu controls for those adjustments. As the standard for mp increases the quality of the cameras with low mp decreases. There are cameras with low megapixels that are worth the money, Kodak DCS720, or 620, and the Nikon D1H. I wouldn't go with an earlier Kodak as they don't take readily accessible memory cards. all three take Nikon lenses and will do good work. Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CHARTER: rec.photo.digital.zlr | David J Taylor | Digital ZLR Cameras | 73 | March 17th 05 06:32 AM |
Digital Cameras: Does Pixel Size Matter? | Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) | Digital Photography | 12 | February 6th 05 08:34 PM |
Best Price on Digital Cameras. | Joe Walsh | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 18th 04 09:52 AM |
What will happen to classic film cameras? | Mike Henley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 15 | July 6th 04 06:24 PM |