Canon Eos 1 DS Mark 2 ??

i already own a canon 20 d .. i was looking foward to upgrade to the canon
eos 1ds mark 2



Tony Polson wrote:
the reason i havent bought it as yet is perhaps my product knowledge is a
lil weak ... so i asked.. thanks anyways.

Perhaps you should start with a beginner's camera, such as the Canon
EOS 350D (Rebel RT) or Nikon D70, and work upwards from there.


--
Message posted via PhotoKB.com
http://www.photokb.com/Uwe/Forums.as...l-slr/200507/1

Abheet G wrote:
i already own a canon 20 d .. i was looking foward to upgrade to the canon
eos 1ds mark 2

There is a lot to like about the 1Ds Mark 2, but out of curiosity what
are you looking for that the 20D is not giving you?

Scott

well i am considering the 1dsmark2 mainly because i am going to be shooting
sills for a feature film .. and with the 20 d i am afraid i will not be able
to make as many blow ups because of the resolution ..as the film publicity
posters wiould require larger files.

Scott W wrote:
i already own a canon 20 d .. i was looking foward to upgrade to the canon
eos 1ds mark 2

There is a lot to like about the 1Ds Mark 2, but out of curiosity what
are you looking for that the 20D is not giving you?

Scott


--
Message posted via PhotoKB.com
http://www.photokb.com/Uwe/Forums.as...l-slr/200507/1

hey tony

i already own a canon 20 d.. now i need to know wether i should upgrade to a
120 film format or stick to digital.. very confused .. please suggest ..

Tony Polson wrote:
the reason i havent bought it as yet is perhaps my product knowledge is a
lil weak ... so i asked.. thanks anyways.

Perhaps you should start with a beginner's camera, such as the Canon
EOS 350D (Rebel RT) or Nikon D70, and work upwards from there.


--
Message posted via PhotoKB.com
http://www.photokb.com/Uwe/Forums.as...l-slr/200507/1

Abheet Gidwani wrote:
hey tony

i already own a canon 20 d.. now i need to know wether i should upgrade to a
120 film format or stick to digital.. very confused .. please suggest ..

I am a huge fan of digital cameras, but unless you are going to be
shooting a lot of stills for movies posters a MF camera would be more
cost effective. The 1Ds Mark 2 will be in many ways a lot easier to
use and avoids the need to scan the film later, but it has a pretty
high price tag, as you well

Scott

"Abheet Gidwani" wrote in message
...
well i am considering the 1dsmark2 mainly because i am going to be
shooting
sills for a feature film .. and with the 20 d i am afraid i will not be
able
to make as many blow ups because of the resolution ..as the film publicity
posters wiould require larger files.


You're going to be shooting window sills for a feature film and you can't
even write or post properly? Damn, the film industry must be dropping their
standards.

Greg

G.T. wrote:
"Abheet Gidwani" wrote in message
...
well i am considering the 1dsmark2 mainly because i am going to be
shooting sills for a feature film .. and with the 20 d i am afraid
i will not be able to make as many blow ups because of the
resolution ..as the film publicity posters wiould require larger
files.


You're going to be shooting window sills for a feature film and you
can't even write or post properly? Damn, the film industry must be
dropping their standards.

Greg

sh

u got a problem greg?
look at what u have written ..
just a peice of advice .. raise your standards by not getting so god damn
literal
cheers!

G.T. wrote:
well i am considering the 1dsmark2 mainly because i am going to be shooting
sills for a feature film .. and with the 20 d i am afraid i will not be able
to make as many blow ups because of the resolution ..as the film publicity
posters wiould require larger files.

You're going to be shooting window sills for a feature film and you can't
even write or post properly? Damn, the film industry must be dropping their
standards.

Greg


--
Message posted via http://www.photokb.com

peice of S$%T
G.T. wrote:
well i am considering the 1dsmark2 mainly because i am going to be shooting
sills for a feature film .. and with the 20 d i am afraid i will not be able
to make as many blow ups because of the resolution ..as the film publicity
posters wiould require larger files.

You're going to be shooting window sills for a feature film and you can't
even write or post properly? Damn, the film industry must be dropping their
standards.

Greg


--
Message posted via http://www.photokb.com

"Abheet G via PhotoKB.com" wrote in message
...
peice of S$%T

Keep digging your own hole. Maybe someday you'll figure out how to use
Usenet. Or maybe not.

Greg