If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
In article , Tony Cooper
wrote: I'm not saying that my version is better or the best. I'm just saying that mine is what I want to show. We either go for stark realism and leave the warts or we remove the warts and try to focus the viewers attention. It's not good to create new warts. Sorry I disagree. Some viewers like the warts. perhaps you can answer your own question: In article , PeterN wrote: Please explain in detail the factual basis for your conclusion. WTF are you blabbering about. He only enters a thread to create dissension. Never to link to a photograph he's taken or to critique one. I don't know why he bothers to read a photo newsgroup. you're wrong as usual. When have you *ever* entered or started a thread about a photograph? i have. and then there's you, who enters a thread solely to attack, Enter it to attack? I started the damn thread. your comment was solely to attack me. It was a thread about a photograph until you diverted it. i didn't divert anything. you did. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
In article , Tony Cooper
wrote: I'm not saying that my version is better or the best. I'm just saying that mine is what I want to show. We either go for stark realism and leave the warts or we remove the warts and try to focus the viewers attention. It's not good to create new warts. Sorry I disagree. Some viewers like the warts. perhaps you can answer your own question: In article , PeterN wrote: Please explain in detail the factual basis for your conclusion. WTF are you blabbering about. He only enters a thread to create dissension. Never to link to a photograph he's taken or to critique one. I don't know why he bothers to read a photo newsgroup. I don't think that you are quite correct. nospam is very knowledgable about some subjects and does have something to contribute to the news group. But when has he ever contributed a photo or a critique or comment about a photo? When has he ever entered a thread about a subject where he wasn't entering to argue with someone about something? many times. you're too bent on bashing that you can't see it, or are intentionally ignoring it so that you can bash. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:19:57 -0500, nospam
wrote: In article , Tony Cooper wrote: I'm not saying that my version is better or the best. I'm just saying that mine is what I want to show. We either go for stark realism and leave the warts or we remove the warts and try to focus the viewers attention. It's not good to create new warts. Sorry I disagree. Some viewers like the warts. perhaps you can answer your own question: In article , PeterN wrote: Please explain in detail the factual basis for your conclusion. WTF are you blabbering about. He only enters a thread to create dissension. Never to link to a photograph he's taken or to critique one. I don't know why he bothers to read a photo newsgroup. you're wrong as usual. and then there's you, who enters a thread solely to attack, as you've done here. peter is also guilty of that too. And you entered this thread only to attack Peter. Go back and look if you don't believe me. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: I'm not saying that my version is better or the best. I'm just saying that mine is what I want to show. We either go for stark realism and leave the warts or we remove the warts and try to focus the viewers attention. It's not good to create new warts. Sorry I disagree. Some viewers like the warts. perhaps you can answer your own question: In article , PeterN wrote: Please explain in detail the factual basis for your conclusion. WTF are you blabbering about. He only enters a thread to create dissension. Never to link to a photograph he's taken or to critique one. I don't know why he bothers to read a photo newsgroup. you're wrong as usual. and then there's you, who enters a thread solely to attack, as you've done here. peter is also guilty of that too. And you entered this thread only to attack Peter. Go back and look if you don't believe me. he asked the very same question of me in response to almost the same comment in another thread. i'm giving back what he dished out first. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
On 2014-11-11 19:54:00 +0000, nospam said:
In article , Tony Cooper wrote: Le Snip When have you *ever* entered or started a thread about a photograph? i have. That should be easy enough to verify. Show us. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
On 2014-11-11 23:35:13 +0000, Tony Cooper said:
Well, as in so many other threads, nospam has taken it over and ****ed it up with his nothing-to-do-with-photography bull****. I'm outta this one. Yup! I killed the the Västerås/London 7D thread and my S/N ratio has improved vastly. The lesson has been learned. I have made the decision that once a thread has been irreversibly derailed, regardless of whoever the flame combatants are, I am going to kill the thread. I am losing patience when it comes to dealing with such BS. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
On 11/12/2014 6:20 AM, Whisky-dave wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 November 2014 01:31:03 UTC, Savageduck wrote: On 2014-11-11 23:35:13 +0000, Tony Cooper said: Well, as in so many other threads, nospam has taken it over and ****ed it up with his nothing-to-do-with-photography bull****. I'm outta this one. Yup! I killed the the Västerås/London 7D thread and my S/N ratio has improved vastly. The lesson has been learned. I have made the decision that once a thread has been irreversibly derailed, regardless of whoever the flame combatants are, I am going to kill the thread. WTF are you talking about derailed ? the above thread is one of the few that has retained it's original point. The 7D 7D mk ii and 7 D mk ii beta test .. been going 44+ days as pointed out and the same question still remains. and with sandmans contritutions it'll stay that way until the end of the world he says so in a meggage ID. This thread hopwever you started has changed already ;-P I am losing patience when it comes to dealing with such BS. -- Regards, Savageduck It won't lat a day longer if you ignore him. -- PeterN |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
In article , Andreas Skitsnack wrote:
Well, as in so many other threads, nospam has taken it over and ****ed it up with his nothing-to-do-with-photography bull****. I'm outta this one. Fewer posts from Andreas? Whoa, is it christmas? -- Sandman[.net] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
In article 2014111117305897385-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-11-11 23:35:13 +0000, Tony Cooper said: Andreas Skitsnack: Well, as in so many other threads, nospam has taken it over and ****ed it up with his nothing-to-do-with-photography bull****. I'm outta this one. Yup! I killed the the Västerås/London 7D thread and my S/N ratio has improved vastly. The lesson has been learned. I have made the decision that once a thread has been irreversibly derailed, regardless of whoever the flame combatants are, I am going to kill the thread. I can't understand why you haven't done that for like... eh, forever? You have to realize that sometimes it's good that some of us keep the moron trolls busy so they don't go around and disturb groups that have actual conversations in it. It's not like that's very common in rpd any more. See it as a service I am losing patience when it comes to dealing with such BS. That's pretty funny. I mean, even if you don't kill such a thread - in what way did you ever "deal" in it? There are tons of threads, daily, on usenet that I don't read, but I haven't killed. I don't consider that I still have to "deal" with them. Aren't you using Unison? Can't it be set to show all posts as unexpanded threads, so even if there are 50+ posts in a thread you dislike, it will show up as one row in your list view and you can just go to the next thread? In slrn, I hit "T" (i.e. shift-t) to mark thread as read and move to next thread. -- Sandman[.net] |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
An actual photo in r.p.d.
In article , PeterN wrote:
Whisky-dave: WTF are you talking about derailed ? the above thread is one of the few that has retained it's original point. The 7D 7D mk ii and 7 D mk ii beta test .. been going 44+ days as pointed out and the same question still remains. and with sandmans contritutions it'll stay that way until the end of the world he says so in a meggage ID. This thread hopwever you started has changed already ;-P It won't lat a day longer if you ignore him. Eh, Peter, it's the other way around - Drunk Dave here is the one that keeps asking the same question. I am the one responding to him, not the other way around. I was done in that thread 54 days ago. -- Sandman[.net] |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it Actual or is it Apparent dynamic range? | Mike Russell[_3_] | Digital Photography | 1 | September 2nd 09 08:22 PM |
Any actual in-depth reviews of the S5 IS yet? | Paul D. Sullivan | Digital Photography | 0 | June 3rd 07 10:21 AM |
Actual Pixels or not | John Smith[_3_] | Digital Photography | 9 | April 21st 07 04:13 PM |
actual size of photos | CNN_news | Digital Photography | 6 | February 11th 06 07:22 PM |
ISO and actual sensitivity in DSLR's (D70, *istD, 20D, S3...) | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 138 | March 30th 05 07:28 PM |