|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 18th 09, 08:26 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
S90 Samples
It seems like Canon's claims about the new sensor sensitivy are right.
The S90 samples certainly look a lot better than my S80 in low light. http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/canons90_preview/ -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com 
|
|
#2
September 18th 09, 10:28 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
S90 Samples
"Robert Spanjaard" wrote in message bel.net... It seems like Canon's claims about the new sensor sensitivy are right. The S90 samples certainly look a lot better than my S80 in low light. There is obvious noise in his jacket, but given the conditions (ISO 1600) it is impressive.
|
|
#3
September 19th 09, 01:02 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
S90 Samples
"Robert Spanjaard" wrote in message bel.net... It seems like Canon's claims about the new sensor sensitivy are right. The S90 samples certainly look a lot better than my S80 in low light. http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/canons90_preview/ The do look nice for a tiny P&S. Is this the same sensor that's in the G11?
|
|
#4
September 19th 09, 01:08 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
S90 Samples
"Charles" wrote in message
... "Robert Spanjaard" wrote in message bel.net... It seems like Canon's claims about the new sensor sensitivy are right. The S90 samples certainly look a lot better than my S80 in low light. There is obvious noise in his jacket, but given the conditions (ISO 1600) it is impressive. Also, quite a lot of noise in the shadows and hair. A bit on the background also. I have seen better. This sort of noise I would expect at 3200 not 1600. MC
|
|
#5
September 19th 09, 10:39 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
S90 Samples
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:08:28 +0100, MC wrote:
It seems like Canon's claims about the new sensor sensitivy are right. The S90 samples certainly look a lot better than my S80 in low light. There is obvious noise in his jacket, but given the conditions (ISO 1600) it is impressive. Also, quite a lot of noise in the shadows and hair. A bit on the background also. I have seen better. This sort of noise I would expect at 3200 not 1600. Makes me wonder which cameras caused such expectations. Got any examples? -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| D3 samples | Malcolm Stewart | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | September 27th 07 06:26 PM |
| New Sony R1-samples | Andreas Buchner | Digital Photography | 10 | November 29th 05 02:09 AM |
| Some samples from my 7D | stator | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | March 28th 05 05:33 PM |
| More 1Ds Mk II samples... | Brian C. Baird | Digital Photography | 2 | September 27th 04 03:26 PM |
| More 1Ds Mk II samples... | Brian C. Baird | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | September 27th 04 03:26 PM |
Linear Mode
