If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can now adapt Leica M lenses to a DSLR
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:04:50, TJ wrote:
On 5 Dec, 04:05, RichA wrote: http://www.cameraquest.com/adaptnew.htm Digital Micro 4/3 Lens Adapters are in preparation. ??LeicaM (yes, you are reading it right,LeicaM) lens adapter to Micro 4/3 adapter expected to arrive by late December! ??$175 email to get on wait list! I have the Leica R 19, 35 and 90 F2.8 Elmarit lenses. Heavy, old but good with resolution which sometimes defies the eye. 90mm is hardly even telephoto by today's standards yet it pulled in 1" steel guy wires at 1.5 miles. I was thinking about using an adapter to put them on an Oly 4/3 digital back. Which are very good cameras. But the bottom line is the Canon APS-C sensor has almost 50% more surface area. (329 sq mm) compared to the 4/3 which has only 225 sq mm, while the 'full' 35mm film/sensor area is 864 sq mm. Which is why I'm planning to buy a Canon XSi/ 450D. I don't expect miracles with the wide angle 19mm Elmarit with the 1.6x crop factor on the PAS-C but the other lenses may show promise. Has anyone used Leica lenses on Canon EOS backs? In general, to have a lens adaptable to your camera body, the lens's "film-to-flange" distance needs to be greater-than or equal to the film-to-flange distance of your camera body. Lenses from systems with larger flange distances (e.g. Nikon F-mount at 46.5mm, Olympus OM at 46mm, etc.) can be used with adapters on many more camera bodies. Bodies from systems with smaller flange distances (4/3 at 38.67mm, Canon EF at 44 mm, u4/3 at 20mm, etc.) can take a greater range of lenses. According to a cursory Google search, Leica M have a quite small flange distance of approximately 28mm, due to the fact that it's a rangefinder rather than an SLR, and doesn't need space for a reflex mirror. Again, Canon's EF SLR mount has a flange distance of approxmately 44 mm. The reason why the u4/3 cameras have such a large range of possiblites for adaptors is that the removal of the reflex mirror allows them to have a flange distance of 20mm. There do exist some adapters that can mount small flange distance lenses on larger flange distance bodies, but doing so removes possibility of focusing at infinity. It is also possible to modify some lenses and cameras to connect to different mounts. E.g. Konica Hexanon lenses can be relatively easily modified to mount on 4/3 cameras. Unless Canon comes out with a new, non-SLR mount that's akin to the u4/3 mount (i.e. one that removes reflex mirror), it is unlikely that you'll be able to use an unmodified Leica R lens on an unmodified Canon body and get full use of the lens. -alan -- Alan Hoyle - - http://www.alanhoyle.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can now adapt Leica M lenses to a DSLR | David J Taylor[_7_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | December 6th 08 07:45 PM |
Can now adapt Leica M lenses to a DSLR | Not Given | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | December 6th 08 04:18 PM |
New Leica S-System 37.5 MP DSLR and lenses; 50% larger than 35mm film! | Bruce[_4_] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 14 | September 23rd 08 10:07 PM |
Ebay for x-mas, Leica M2, Lecia R3, five leica lenses | Eddie | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 14th 05 05:25 AM |
FS: Leica Adapter to Use Nikkor SLR Lenses on your M Series Leica | Don Whipple | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | September 24th 03 04:05 AM |