If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
What do you recommend as an ideal lens (for use with a Nikon D40) for
close up work with wild flowers? or is it better to use extension tubes with a regular lens?? Any advice much appreciated as I don't know too much about the technicalities here - but I guess what I need is a good depth of field coupled with a close focus capability. Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
wrote in message ups.com... What do you recommend as an ideal lens (for use with a Nikon D40) for close up work with wild flowers? or is it better to use extension tubes with a regular lens?? Any advice much appreciated as I don't know too much about the technicalities here - but I guess what I need is a good depth of field coupled with a close focus capability. Mark Hi. DoF and Close Focus are almost mutually exclusive. The closer you get the smaller the DoF. The only way round this is to use a very small aperture, which will require a long exposure, so what you need is a good tripod. Using extension tubes to get Close Focus usually results in almost non-existant DoF, and reduces the "effective" aperture of the lens. DSLRs have a seemingly better DoF, because of their small sensors, but also have problems with using small apertures, and non-macro lenses are usually computed to produce their best results with a moderatly wide aperture. Macro and nearly macro is a bit of a specialised subject. Nikon has Macro lenses, but I am fairly certain they do not have the built in motors required to AF with the D40, and they are expensive. Roy G |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
On Jun 20, 2:10 pm, "Roy G" wrote:
Macro and nearly macro is a bit of a specialised subject. Nikon has Macro lenses, but I am fairly certain they do not have the built in motors required to AF with the D40, and they are expensive. The non-Nikon macros (Tamron, Sigma, Tokina) are a lot cheaper and all optically excellent. I have a Tamron 90mm and it is very well suited to flower photography (and portraits) in addition to macro work. It does not have a motor, though, so manual focus will be necessary on the d40. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
Roy G wrote:
Hi. DoF and Close Focus are almost mutually exclusive. The closer you get the smaller the DoF. The only way round this is to use a very small aperture, which will require a long exposure, so what you need is a good tripod. Agreed. But if you're outdoors and the flowers wave in the wind ... all out of options. BugBear |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
On 20 Jun, 09:51, wrote:
What do you recommend as an ideal lens (for use with a Nikon D40) for close up work with wild flowers? or is it better to use extension tubes with a regular lens?? Any advice much appreciated as I don't know too much about the technicalities here - but I guess what I need is a good depth of field coupled with a close focus capability. I have a 105mm f/2.8 Sigma macro that I am very happy with. It is the clearest of all of my lenses. I considered it for portraits but it is a bit too long for that. Mine has a Canon mount and I use it on my 300D but I expect that it is available with a Nikon mount. As the others have said, good flower photos are still a challenge since good depth of field means narrow aperture which means long exposure which means a tripod and a still subject. On the other hand, some photos do benefit from a low depth of field. -- Seán Ó Leathlóbhair |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
On Jun 20, 4:51 am, wrote:
What do you recommend as an ideal lens (for use with a Nikon D40) for close up work with wild flowers? or is it better to use extension tubes with a regular lens?? Any advice much appreciated as I don't know too much about the technicalities here - but I guess what I need is a good depth of field coupled with a close focus capability. Mark The one macro (Nikon speak Micro) lens that will autofocus on the D40 is the 105 f2.8 micro, great lens BTW. If you are only working in macro say 1:1 (lifesize on sensor) to 1:3, you really don't need auto focus, manual is more accurate, that said the viewfinder on the D40 (my experience is with a D70) is very dim and a little difficult to manual focus. Depth of field decreases with the increase in magnification, so at 1:1 you have very little depth of field. Also you loose light with increased magnification. A macro (micro) lens extended to 1:1 mag has an exposure of 2 f-stops less than at infinity, so if your meter reads f11 at infinity the esposure would be f5.6 at 1:1 mag, or f11 at 1/100 of a second at infinity would be f11 at 1/25 at 1:1mag. Tripods are a good thing with macro because of this light loss. Another alternative would be add on lenses, Canon makes very good set that come as close as possible to maintaining lens image quality. They screw in to the front threads on a lens and can be used on any model camera or lens. These won't give you the magnification of a macro lens, but will work with most flowers. Telephoto lenses work best with add on lenses. Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
On Jun 20, 3:51 am, wrote:
What do you recommend as an ideal lens (for use with a Nikon D40) for close up work with wild flowers? or is it better to use extension tubes with a regular lens?? Any advice much appreciated as I don't know too much about the technicalities here - but I guess what I need is a good depth of field coupled with a close focus capability. Mark Some considerations. Many macro zoom lenses are macro only in the longest focal length position (highest zoom). Thus you do not have control of perspective. Extension tubes effectively increase the actual object and image distance. Perspective is actually a function of object distance rather than focal length. For better perspective control, I prefer supplemental or plus lenses, also called "closeup" lenses." Too large an object distance on a macro photo "compresses" depth. While this makes depth of field easier to control, I don't like the effect. I prefer shorter distances, and shoot with as high an f/# as the lens will go. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
Roy G wrote:
Macro and nearly macro is a bit of a specialised subject. Nikon has Macro lenses, Which Nikon calls Micro for whatever reason but I am fairly certain they do not have the built in motors required to AF with the D40 Easy enough to check. From http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=5: Close-Up Lenses 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D ED-IF AF Micro-Nikkor So the 105mm does have AF-S, the 60 and 200 don't. Price for the 105 at B&H: $739.95 Of course there are also macro lenses from the usual third party manufacturers. One cheap way to get started with macro photography is to use close-up lenses that are screwed in at the front of a regular lens. They run around 25$ US for a set of four. jue |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ideal lens for wild flower close ups?
acl wrote:
On Jun 20, 2:10 pm, "Roy G" wrote: Macro and nearly macro is a bit of a specialised subject. Nikon has Macro lenses, but I am fairly certain they do not have the built in motors required to AF with the D40, and they are expensive. The non-Nikon macros (Tamron, Sigma, Tokina) are a lot cheaper and all optically excellent. I have a Tamron 90mm and it is very well suited to flower photography (and portraits) in addition to macro work. It does not have a motor, though, so manual focus will be necessary on the d40. The OP needs to be aware of a couple more bits of information here. First, 90mm and 105mm macro lenses are more or less in a sweet spot for ease of optical design. There simply aren't any bad ones! The cheapest ones ever made were pretty good, optically. Spending money does not buy better optical results, but it can buy better quality of build (ruggedness), more convenience, ease of operation... that sort of thing. It can also buy frills that might not be so useful. To be honest, for most photomacrography there isn't any need for the electronics in modern lenses! Manual focus usually works much better. It also happens that using the blink-on-over-exposure LCD display or even a histogram is a better method for exposure control, using manual mode, than is the light meter with or without automatic exposure control. However, the OP specifically mentioned flowers, and if they are halfway large flowers it might well be that AF and AE will be useful. But the higher the magnification, the less so... Hence the suggestion that a 3rd party Brand X lense might be useful is a *very* good one. In fact, I use a 30 year old manual focus off brand (okay, Kiron is a cult, not a brand x) 105mm macro lense and wouldn't trade it straight across for a Nikkor 105mm macro. If I dropped that lense and broke it into 100 pieces tomorrow, I would immediately be looking for another one on eBay. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any good wild flower sites around Austin Texas? | Lew | Photographing Nature | 0 | March 10th 06 05:25 AM |
Any good wild flower sites around Austin Texas? | Art S | Photographing Nature | 0 | March 9th 06 05:07 AM |
FA:Skymax 127mm Mak telescope, ideal Astro/Spotting scope or 1500mmf12 T2 mnt lens. | DH | General Equipment For Sale | 1 | August 18th 05 12:56 PM |
FS: Two Rolleicord V(b) cameras, eyelevel prism finder, telephoto lens, close up lens, etc. | Otto Fajen | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | April 17th 04 07:58 AM |
FS: Two Rolleicord V(b) cameras, eyelevel prism finder, telephoto lens, close up lens, etc. | Otto Fajen | Medium Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | April 17th 04 07:58 AM |