If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Photoshop Levels & camera Histograms
It occured to me that unless you want a soft image (I like bold high
contrast pics) there is almost no loss in using the levels adjustment in photoshop to clip off the dead space at the high & low ends in the levels adjustment. If it's flat, there isn't anything to lose theoretically though you may need to readjust the center point back. However this doesn't always work: if I do so, I can see highlights getting (nearly) blown out so aprt from the logic it doesn't seem to work. I've read that curves are more sophisticated than levels and I agree because you can increase the contrast of just the shadows or just the highlights & hold the middle tones or not as desired. Either way, increasing the contrast can overdo the saturation so I usually desaturate a bit afterwards I don't know how you'd correct a histogram while shooting if it's getting dead space at the highs & or lows. Perhaps the aperture effects this? ISO? I assume that dead space means you are missing out on potential dynamic range. There are cases where you want a soft look & it's OK but my preference is usually for something very rich. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In message ,
Stacey wrote: paul wrote: Curves give better control over what you are changing but levels seems to show what you have in terms of dynamic range. Of the two, I've found curves to be much more useful. It would be even more useful if the interface were bigger, and had more resolution, and had better curve control tools. Splines are not very useful, IMO. -- John P Sheehy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
paul wrote in :
I don't know how you'd correct a histogram while shooting if it's getting dead space at the highs & or lows. Perhaps the aperture effects this? ISO? I assume that dead space means you are missing out on If you have dead space at the highs OR lows, then you just need to change either the aperature or the shutter speed to let in more light or less. If you have dead space in both highs and lows at the same time, then with some cameras (My Coolpix 5000, for instance) I can change the contrast setting in the shooting menu and it will expand the curve. I found this handy when shooting a distant skyline on a hazy day. Bob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
paul wrote in :
I don't know how you'd correct a histogram while shooting if it's getting dead space at the highs & or lows. Perhaps the aperture effects this? ISO? I assume that dead space means you are missing out on If you have dead space at the highs OR lows, then you just need to change either the aperature or the shutter speed to let in more light or less. If you have dead space in both highs and lows at the same time, then with some cameras (My Coolpix 5000, for instance) I can change the contrast setting in the shooting menu and it will expand the curve. I found this handy when shooting a distant skyline on a hazy day. Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photoshop Levels & camera Histograms | paul | Digital Photography | 11 | December 29th 04 12:16 AM |
Preferable to sharpen in camera or in Photoshop? | Burt | Digital Photography | 19 | December 28th 04 09:43 PM |
Digital zoom camera & lots of selection questions | Lou | Digital Photography | 5 | November 12th 04 12:43 AM |
coolpix 5700 and speed of writing to cf card | JS | Digital Photography | 12 | September 15th 04 11:17 PM |
Batteries for Kodak DX3600 Camera Dock | Larry R Harrison Jr | Digital Photography | 10 | July 24th 04 05:49 PM |