If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
I have an HP PC. After PS CC2015 came out, it has been getting slower,
to the point where it was becoming unusable. I just am not in the mood for a new machine. I tried added 16G memory, no joy. While i have a reasonable working knowledge of software, I have not that knowledgeable about hardware. The solution. I got a new graphics card. The first had to be returned because it requires more power than can be supplied by the slot, and my machine did not support the additional power. The second graphics card has 2gig graphics memory and the machine now runs like a gazelle. Total cost of the fix: Memory $79, after rebate. Graphics card $69. Time to fix, under one hour, including two trips to Microcenter, removal of the side panel, and sticking in the new hardware. The driver installation time took and additional 45 minutes. Much less time than reinstalling software on a new machine and a lot less expensive. I am posting this to help anyone who may have a similar issue. -- PeterN |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
On 01/10/2016 11:58 AM, PeterN wrote:
I have an HP PC. After PS CC2015 came out, it has been getting slower, to the point where it was becoming unusable. I just am not in the mood for a new machine. I tried added 16G memory, no joy. While i have a reasonable working knowledge of software, I have not that knowledgeable about hardware. The solution. I got a new graphics card. The first had to be returned because it requires more power than can be supplied by the slot, and my machine did not support the additional power. The second graphics card has 2gig graphics memory and the machine now runs like a gazelle. Total cost of the fix: Memory $79, after rebate. Graphics card $69. Time to fix, under one hour, including two trips to Microcenter, removal of the side panel, and sticking in the new hardware. The driver installation time took and additional 45 minutes. Much less time than reinstalling software on a new machine and a lot less expensive. I am posting this to help anyone who may have a similar issue. Not incredibly unusual. The old rule of thumb for speeding up a computer was to max out the RAM, so to avoid the computer accessing the (slower than RAM) hard drive. In your case, apparently the RAM was needed for graphics processing. Allegedly, fonts and saved URL's can also chew up processing power. But that might be from "the good ol' days" and no longer valid. Of course, if you really want your computer to run like a more athletic gazelle, you could dump Windows and load Linux, but that solution brings you a whole new set of problems! Congrats on your successful and economic fix! -- Ken Hart |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
On 1/10/2016 6:09 PM, RichA wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 11:58:53 UTC-5, peterN wrote: I have an HP PC. After PS CC2015 came out, it has been getting slower, to the point where it was becoming unusable. I just am not in the mood for a new machine. I tried added 16G memory, no joy. While i have a reasonable working knowledge of software, I have not that knowledgeable about hardware. The solution. I got a new graphics card. The first had to be returned because it requires more power than can be supplied by the slot, and my machine did not support the additional power. The second graphics card has 2gig graphics memory and the machine now runs like a gazelle. Total cost of the fix: Memory $79, after rebate. Graphics card $69. Time to fix, under one hour, including two trips to Microcenter, removal of the side panel, and sticking in the new hardware. The driver installation time took and additional 45 minutes. Much less time than reinstalling software on a new machine and a lot less expensive. I am posting this to help anyone who may have a similar issue. -- PeterN I thought higher-end graphics cards included their own power input? It seems the lower end. At least at Microcenter. -- PeterN |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
On 1/10/2016 7:18 PM, Ken Hart wrote:
On 01/10/2016 11:58 AM, PeterN wrote: I have an HP PC. After PS CC2015 came out, it has been getting slower, to the point where it was becoming unusable. I just am not in the mood for a new machine. I tried added 16G memory, no joy. While i have a reasonable working knowledge of software, I have not that knowledgeable about hardware. The solution. I got a new graphics card. The first had to be returned because it requires more power than can be supplied by the slot, and my machine did not support the additional power. The second graphics card has 2gig graphics memory and the machine now runs like a gazelle. Total cost of the fix: Memory $79, after rebate. Graphics card $69. Time to fix, under one hour, including two trips to Microcenter, removal of the side panel, and sticking in the new hardware. The driver installation time took and additional 45 minutes. Much less time than reinstalling software on a new machine and a lot less expensive. I am posting this to help anyone who may have a similar issue. Not incredibly unusual. The old rule of thumb for speeding up a computer was to max out the RAM, so to avoid the computer accessing the (slower than RAM) hard drive. In your case, apparently the RAM was needed for graphics processing. I first upped the ram to 20G. That did nothing. Apparently the newer versions of PS are more graphics intensive. What is strange is that the processor is an 8 core I7. Apparently PS doesn't do multi threading very well. Allegedly, fonts and saved URL's can also chew up processing power. But that might be from "the good ol' days" and no longer valid. Of course, if you really want your computer to run like a more athletic gazelle, you could dump Windows and load Linux, but that solution brings you a whole new set of problems! True, but I also want the machine to do things. Solaris is also a lot faster. Both Linux and Solaris have too much of a futz factor for this old fart. At this stage I just want to play with my photos, and Win best suits my needs. If I decide to intensively pursue my poking into relativity I will probably reinstall my old Linux and run a dual boot. Congrats on your successful and economic fix! Thanks. -- PeterN |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:58:30 -0500, PeterN
wrote: I have an HP PC. After PS CC2015 came out, it has been getting slower, to the point where it was becoming unusable. I just am not in the mood for a new machine. I tried added 16G memory, no joy. While i have a reasonable working knowledge of software, I have not that knowledgeable about hardware. The solution. I got a new graphics card. The first had to be returned because it requires more power than can be supplied by the slot, and my machine did not support the additional power. The second graphics card has 2gig graphics memory and the machine now runs like a gazelle. Total cost of the fix: Memory $79, after rebate. Graphics card $69. Time to fix, under one hour, including two trips to Microcenter, removal of the side panel, and sticking in the new hardware. The driver installation time took and additional 45 minutes. Much less time than reinstalling software on a new machine and a lot less expensive. I am posting this to help anyone who may have a similar issue. One caveat should be added. Some of the cheaper graphics cards are not much of an improvement over the integrated graphics on some main boards. This is usually a smart upgrade, and apparently worked very well for you, but anyone thinking of doing the same should do some research first. It would be easy to spend $100 on a card, and get no improvement. One other bit of advice, and this has come up before regarding LR, is to uncheck the "Use GPU" box in preferences. That cures issues for lots of people, and helped me some. I'm bringing this up because I've also started to look into this for the same problem. I was about to buy a card that was on sale, but I did some research first, and found that I would have gained nothing at all. Luckily, mine is only a little slow, and I can easily live with it. It's a tough decision because I know I'll probably have to spend close to $200. I am glad you posted this. With the dramatic improvement you saw, I'm more convinced that this might help me out, and be worth the investment. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
In article , PeterN
wrote: The old rule of thumb for speeding up a computer was to max out the RAM, so to avoid the computer accessing the (slower than RAM) hard drive. In your case, apparently the RAM was needed for graphics processing. I first upped the ram to 20G. That did nothing. then the bottlenecks were elsewhere. Apparently the newer versions of PS are more graphics intensive. that makes no sense. newer versions of photoshop offload to the gpu when needed, if that's what you mean. What is strange is that the processor is an 8 core I7. Apparently PS doesn't do multi threading very well. photoshop does multithreading quite well and has done so since the 1990s. however, not all actions benefit from multithreading. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
In article , Bill W
wrote: One other bit of advice, and this has come up before regarding LR, is to uncheck the "Use GPU" box in preferences. That cures issues for lots of people, and helped me some. if you don't mind slowing things down, go for it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
In article , Ken Hart
wrote: The old rule of thumb for speeding up a computer was to max out the RAM, so to avoid the computer accessing the (slower than RAM) hard drive. In your case, apparently the RAM was needed for graphics processing. graphics processing is done in the gpu. Allegedly, fonts and saved URL's can also chew up processing power. But that might be from "the good ol' days" and no longer valid. that was never valid. Of course, if you really want your computer to run like a more athletic gazelle, you could dump Windows and load Linux, but that solution brings you a whole new set of problems! namely the lack of software, which has the net effect of making the system slower. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:16:21 -0500, nospam
wrote: In article , Bill W wrote: One other bit of advice, and this has come up before regarding LR, is to uncheck the "Use GPU" box in preferences. That cures issues for lots of people, and helped me some. if you don't mind slowing things down, go for it. It can slow things in the develop module, and yes, it's the most used things. But... some of us have serious issues with either spot removal, or working with the brush. There is way too much latency, and unchecking that box can help. Fortunately, my system is fast enough that whatever slowing there is in the other adjustments is not noticeable. I also haven't had any crashes since I unchecked it, but I need to spend more time with it before I know if that issue is fixed. I'm going through an older set of photos tonight, so I'll know more. I also tried to set my BIOS so that 2 GB of ram is dedicated to graphics, but the highest setting is only 1/4 of that. I realize that's adjusted dynamically, but I think it slows things in some cases. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Slow PC issue easily fixed, once you understand the problem
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:09:58 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: On Sunday, 10 January 2016 11:58:53 UTC-5, peterN wrote: I have an HP PC. After PS CC2015 came out, it has been getting slower, to the point where it was becoming unusable. I just am not in the mood for a new machine. I tried added 16G memory, no joy. While i have a reasonable working knowledge of software, I have not that knowledgeable about hardware. The solution. I got a new graphics card. The first had to be returned because it requires more power than can be supplied by the slot, and my machine did not support the additional power. The second graphics card has 2gig graphics memory and the machine now runs like a gazelle. Total cost of the fix: Memory $79, after rebate. Graphics card $69. Time to fix, under one hour, including two trips to Microcenter, removal of the side panel, and sticking in the new hardware. The driver installation time took and additional 45 minutes. Much less time than reinstalling software on a new machine and a lot less expensive. I am posting this to help anyone who may have a similar issue. -- PeterN I thought higher-end graphics cards included their own power input? Most graphics cards get their power from the PCI bus. It is quite usual when upgrading graphics cards to have to also upgrade the computer's power supply. The reason your computer seems to have been getting slower is that LR (in particular) tries to make use of the graphics processors on the graphics card to get increased processing capability. If the graphics card is not up to the demands they are bypassed with much of the processing left to the CPU. These sites may help you Photoshop https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro...uirements.html Lightroom https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/sy...uirements.html Premier Pro (Video) https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro...uirements.html Adobe Tests and compatability: Important https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb...-card-faq.html -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon--Trying to Understand | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 17 | June 14th 07 07:06 PM |
ProShow Gold slow video import - slow can anyone help? | Derek | Digital Photography | 0 | January 8th 06 10:52 AM |
Canon 28-105 USM / Autofocus problem - can it be fixed? | Jakob D | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | December 31st 04 06:14 PM |
Canon 28-105 USM / Autofocus problem - can it be fixed? | Jakob D | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | December 31st 04 09:10 AM |
What Don't I understand? | Bob Hatch | Digital Photography | 2 | July 7th 04 06:01 PM |