ATTN: tony Cooper

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20140116_sawgrass%20mall_6150.jpg


--
PeterN

On 2014-01-17 04:44:41 +0000, PeterN said:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

Of course it was.
How about the lens flare?
Tell us your secret technique for capturing deliberate lens flare.


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20140116_sawgrass%20mall_6150.jpg


--


Regards,

Savageduck

On 1/17/2014 2:15 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:44:41 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20140116_sawgrass%20mall_6150.jpg

She's not carrying any packages, so she hasn't been all that busy. The
busy ones are carrying packages from Burberry's, Coach, Gucci, Jimmy
Choo, and Neiman Marcus.

The woman is not my wife.

--
PeterN

On 1/17/2014 12:14 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-01-17 04:44:41 +0000, PeterN said:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

Of course it was.
How about the lens flare?
Tell us your secret technique for capturing deliberate lens flare.

I should have said lens flare, not glare. As to secret technique, take
of the hood and point the lens near the sun.



https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20140116_sawgrass%20mall_6150.jpg






--
PeterN

"Tony Cooper" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 02:52:40 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

On 1/17/2014 2:15 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:44:41 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20140116_sawgrass%20mall_6150.jpg

She's not carrying any packages, so she hasn't been all that busy. The
busy ones are carrying packages from Burberry's, Coach, Gucci, Jimmy
Choo, and Neiman Marcus.

The woman is not my wife.

I won't tell. What happens in Sunrise, stays in Sunrise.

That's a relief.

On 1/17/2014 2:56 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 02:52:40 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

On 1/17/2014 2:15 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:44:41 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20140116_sawgrass%20mall_6150.jpg

She's not carrying any packages, so she hasn't been all that busy. The
busy ones are carrying packages from Burberry's, Coach, Gucci, Jimmy
Choo, and Neiman Marcus.

The woman is not my wife.

I won't tell. What happens in Sunrise, stays in Sunrise.

That's a relief.




--
PeterN

On 1/17/2014 3:51 AM, Richard wrote:
"Tony Cooper" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 02:52:40 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

On 1/17/2014 2:15 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:44:41 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20140116_sawgrass%20mall_6150.jpg


She's not carrying any packages, so she hasn't been all that busy. The
busy ones are carrying packages from Burberry's, Coach, Gucci, Jimmy
Choo, and Neiman Marcus.

The woman is not my wife.

I won't tell. What happens in Sunrise, stays in Sunrise.

That's a relief.

G

--
PeterN

In article , says...

PeterN wrote:

On 1/17/2014 12:14 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-01-17 04:44:41 +0000, PeterN
said:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

Of course it was.
How about the lens flare?
Tell us your secret technique for capturing deliberate lens flare.

I should have said lens flare, not glare. As to secret technique,
take of the hood and point the lens near the sun.


But why? Why would you "deliberately" include lens flare?

It works for JJ Abrams . . .

What did
you intended to achieve with this inclusion of lens flare and what do
you think the image would lack if the lens flare was not present?

Making millions just like JJ?

On 1/17/14 8:24 AM, in article , "MC"
wrote:

PeterN wrote:

On 1/17/2014 12:14 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-01-17 04:44:41 +0000, PeterN
said:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

Of course it was.
How about the lens flare?
Tell us your secret technique for capturing deliberate lens flare.

I should have said lens flare, not glare. As to secret technique,
take of the hood and point the lens near the sun.


But why? Why would you "deliberately" include lens flare? What did
you intended to achieve with this inclusion of lens flare and what do
you think the image would lack if the lens flare was not present?

MC

It was the "KneeCam Effect". You haven't heard of it?!?

On 1/17/2014 9:24 AM, MC wrote:
PeterN wrote:

On 1/17/2014 12:14 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-01-17 04:44:41 +0000, PeterN
said:

My wife was busy saving me money, so I could take this picture.
(The glare was deliberate.)

Of course it was.
How about the lens flare?
Tell us your secret technique for capturing deliberate lens flare.

I should have said lens flare, not glare. As to secret technique,
take of the hood and point the lens near the sun.


But why? Why would you "deliberately" include lens flare? What did
you intended to achieve with this inclusion of lens flare and what do
you think the image would lack if the lens flare was not present?


I'm sure you noticed that the flare, forms a triangle with the trees and
the woman's head. These triangles mimics the triangles formed with the
shadows, and the woman's legs.
I also deliberately have a tilting horizon line.


--
PeterN