A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

dslr cheaper than 300d?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 04, 11:35 AM
Mark B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote in message
...
Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d? I already
have a telephoto lens for my eos300 film, so canon would be preferable

(I'll
live with the 1.6 mag/crop), but I could always sell my film camera

complete
with lens if I could find a cheaper digital equivalent.

I don't want to spend 700 GBP on a camera to replace my film version - it
just doesn't seem worth it and I know the compact digital cameras are slow
to take photos and slow to switch on etc, but they also only cost from

just
150-200 pounds! I could probably sell my 300+lens+bag+bits for nearly that
and go digital for nothing, but I like my slr.

Advice? Stick with film for now?, or take the plunge and go digital
compact?, or can I get a cheap dslr?



Nope, not unless you want to look for a used D30 or D60.

Mark


  #2  
Old August 19th 04, 11:35 AM
Mark B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote in message
...
Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d? I already
have a telephoto lens for my eos300 film, so canon would be preferable

(I'll
live with the 1.6 mag/crop), but I could always sell my film camera

complete
with lens if I could find a cheaper digital equivalent.

I don't want to spend 700 GBP on a camera to replace my film version - it
just doesn't seem worth it and I know the compact digital cameras are slow
to take photos and slow to switch on etc, but they also only cost from

just
150-200 pounds! I could probably sell my 300+lens+bag+bits for nearly that
and go digital for nothing, but I like my slr.

Advice? Stick with film for now?, or take the plunge and go digital
compact?, or can I get a cheap dslr?



Nope, not unless you want to look for a used D30 or D60.

Mark


  #3  
Old August 19th 04, 12:10 PM
Rick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote in message
...
Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d?


Yes...a used 300D.


  #4  
Old August 19th 04, 12:10 PM
Rick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote in message
...
Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d?


Yes...a used 300D.


  #5  
Old August 19th 04, 12:35 PM
Gareth Tuckwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default dslr cheaper than 300d?

Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d? I already
have a telephoto lens for my eos300 film, so canon would be preferable (I'll
live with the 1.6 mag/crop), but I could always sell my film camera complete
with lens if I could find a cheaper digital equivalent.

I don't want to spend 700 GBP on a camera to replace my film version - it
just doesn't seem worth it and I know the compact digital cameras are slow
to take photos and slow to switch on etc, but they also only cost from just
150-200 pounds! I could probably sell my 300+lens+bag+bits for nearly that
and go digital for nothing, but I like my slr.

Advice? Stick with film for now?, or take the plunge and go digital
compact?, or can I get a cheap dslr?


  #6  
Old August 19th 04, 12:53 PM
Mark Roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote:

Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d?


Not yet. Wait a couple of months. Photokina is coming next month.

--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
  #7  
Old August 19th 04, 12:53 PM
Mark Roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote:

Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d?


Not yet. Wait a couple of months. Photokina is coming next month.

--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
  #8  
Old August 19th 04, 12:53 PM
Mark Roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote:

Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d?


Not yet. Wait a couple of months. Photokina is coming next month.

--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
  #9  
Old August 19th 04, 02:02 PM
Darrell Larose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The 300D or Drebel will have it's price cut by about usd $150 to compete
with Pentax's new econo dSLR

"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote in message
...
Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d? I already
have a telephoto lens for my eos300 film, so canon would be preferable

(I'll
live with the 1.6 mag/crop), but I could always sell my film camera

complete
with lens if I could find a cheaper digital equivalent.

I don't want to spend 700 GBP on a camera to replace my film version - it
just doesn't seem worth it and I know the compact digital cameras are slow
to take photos and slow to switch on etc, but they also only cost from

just
150-200 pounds! I could probably sell my 300+lens+bag+bits for nearly that
and go digital for nothing, but I like my slr.

Advice? Stick with film for now?, or take the plunge and go digital
compact?, or can I get a cheap dslr?




  #10  
Old August 19th 04, 02:02 PM
Darrell Larose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The 300D or Drebel will have it's price cut by about usd $150 to compete
with Pentax's new econo dSLR

"Gareth Tuckwell" wrote in message
...
Is there a digital slr available that is cheaper than the 300d? I already
have a telephoto lens for my eos300 film, so canon would be preferable

(I'll
live with the 1.6 mag/crop), but I could always sell my film camera

complete
with lens if I could find a cheaper digital equivalent.

I don't want to spend 700 GBP on a camera to replace my film version - it
just doesn't seem worth it and I know the compact digital cameras are slow
to take photos and slow to switch on etc, but they also only cost from

just
150-200 pounds! I could probably sell my 300+lens+bag+bits for nearly that
and go digital for nothing, but I like my slr.

Advice? Stick with film for now?, or take the plunge and go digital
compact?, or can I get a cheap dslr?




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EOS Film user needs help for first DSLR Ged Digital Photography 13 August 9th 04 10:44 PM
Problem with AF on 50mm f1.8 and 300D? Rowan Crowe Digital Photography 9 July 24th 04 04:39 AM
Can someone help with a 300D questions DJ Digital Photography 11 July 21st 04 01:58 PM
Yet another 300d vs D70 post! Rich Powell Digital Photography 18 July 14th 04 05:37 PM
Why go dSLR? Bob Digital Photography 69 June 27th 04 07:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.