|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
August 6th 04, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Noblex 135 quality
Hello,
I´m interested in Noblex 135 but I´m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135? 
|
|
#2
August 6th 04, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
I'm happy with mine. Prints to 40" are sharp enough for
my eye. YMMV. Jytzel wrote: Hello, I´m interested in Noblex 135 but I´m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135?
|
|
#3
August 6th 04, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
I'm happy with mine. Prints to 40" are sharp enough for
my eye. YMMV. Jytzel wrote: Hello, I´m interested in Noblex 135 but I´m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135?
|
|
#4
August 7th 04, 07:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
(Jytzel) wrote: Hello, I=B4m interested in Noblex 135 but I=B4m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The photos in the gallery below were taken with that camera. http://www.johnshephard.com/image_ga..._panoramic.htm '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''= ''''''''''''''' Cody, http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/wee...itor/index.htm http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOverc...otographyLinks
|
|
#5
August 7th 04, 07:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
(Jytzel) wrote: Hello, I=B4m interested in Noblex 135 but I=B4m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The photos in the gallery below were taken with that camera. http://www.johnshephard.com/image_ga..._panoramic.htm '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''= ''''''''''''''' Cody, http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/wee...itor/index.htm http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOverc...otographyLinks
|
|
#6
August 7th 04, 07:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
(Jytzel) wrote: Hello, I=B4m interested in Noblex 135 but I=B4m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The photos in the gallery below were taken with that camera. http://www.johnshephard.com/image_ga..._panoramic.htm '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''= ''''''''''''''' Cody, http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/wee...itor/index.htm http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOverc...otographyLinks
|
|
#7
August 7th 04, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
Well, I had a Horizon and was happy to get rid of it some time ago and now
I own a Noblex 135U and the quality is quite acceptable. I found out that if one uses a tripod and stops the aperture down to 8 or so, the quality is good. I am not really excited but I am usually using 120 film and did not want to get the much large and more expensive 150 Noblex.... To cut the long story short, the quality is fine if you stop down and use a tripod. Rgds George Nyman http://www.gnyman.com On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:47:46 -0700, Jytzel wrote: Hello, I´m interested in Noblex 135 but I´m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135?
|
|
#8
August 7th 04, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
Well, I had a Horizon and was happy to get rid of it some time ago and now
I own a Noblex 135U and the quality is quite acceptable. I found out that if one uses a tripod and stops the aperture down to 8 or so, the quality is good. I am not really excited but I am usually using 120 film and did not want to get the much large and more expensive 150 Noblex.... To cut the long story short, the quality is fine if you stop down and use a tripod. Rgds George Nyman http://www.gnyman.com On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:47:46 -0700, Jytzel wrote: Hello, I´m interested in Noblex 135 but I´m worried regarding the lens quality. I have tied Horizon and found the quality to be useless. How better is Noblex 135?
|
|
#9
August 8th 04, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noblex 135 quality
John Grillo of The Rockaway Artists Alliance
has exhibited some amazing photos of the now defunct Rockaways Playland amusement park, taken with a Widelux 35mm panoramic camera. I believe he uses Widelux model F7. Excelsior, you fatheads! -Chris-
|
|
#10
August 8th 04, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Grillo of The Rockaway Artists Alliance
has exhibited some amazing photos of the now defunct Rockaways Playland amusement park, taken with a Widelux 35mm panoramic camera. I believe he uses Widelux model F7. Excelsior, you fatheads! -Chris-
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poor JPEGs Quality with Nikon D100 | john chapman | Digital Photography | 3 | July 5th 04 05:55 PM |
| Make Professional Quality Posters from Your Digital Images | gerry4La | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 0 | June 22nd 04 05:04 AM |
| Make Professional Quality Posters from Your Digital Images | gerry4La | Other Photographic Equipment | 0 | June 22nd 04 05:03 AM |
| NOBLEX: Better than Widelux, larger than X-Pan (and Heliar...) | ricciaa2004 | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 3 | May 24th 04 10:55 PM |
| JPEG Questions: Loss In Quality When "Saving" | Xtx99 | General Photography Techniques | 3 | April 8th 04 04:25 PM |
Linear Mode
