RichA TROLLS again. Or should I say, LOSER!

anti-smoking propaganda snipped

This has what to do with photography and cameras? You POS TROLL.

ASCII wrote in news:4c6c4f4a.1275562@EDCBIC:

SNIP Sybil

The fact that trying to sell used equipment is much more difficult if the
previous owner was a smoker, unless a sepia tint is something of value.


Or, as the OP says, it's easier to buy/sell if nothing is mentioned about
the smoky covered condition of the lens.


Perhaps the Sybil smoker has something to *HACK* *COUGH* *HACK* about that
I know is so important eyeroll



--
__
SneakyP
To email me, you know what to do.

Supernews, if you get a complaint from a Jamie Baillie, please see:
http://www.canadianisp.ca/jamie_baillie.html

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:13:05 -0700, ASCII wrote:

Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:

anti-smoking propaganda snipped

This has what to do with photography and cameras? You POS TROLL.

The fact that trying to sell used equipment is much more difficult if the
previous owner was a smoker, unless a sepia tint is something of value.

And more people die from car accidents than smoking. (BTW: most smokers
never die from smoking related illnesses). So by this logic of yours, all
people should stop driving cars because camera equipment that they carry in
their car is much more difficult to resell after its been in a car
accident. Driving is not a requirement of life, it's a choice, but it puts
more people in hospitals than anything. Not to mention the air-pollution in
cities from car exhausts that subjects each citizen of every city to as
many carcinogens as if they had smoked two packs of cigarettes a day just
by inhaling city air. This doesn't even count the amount of lead
contamination in all the soils of every city from the nearly century-long
use of leaded-fuels. Any city lot can be declared a highly contaminated
HAZMAT zone if tested for lead. Did you not know this? Driving of ALL cars
should be made ILLEGAL by your logic.

(I've no doubt that the lead in city-soils will lead to the downfall of
humanity no different than the use of lead-pipes did in Rome. All of you
show signs of major brain-damage already, you just don't realize it.)

Holy ****, you fools are the most ignorant and childishly manipulative
trolls on earth.

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:13:05 -0700, ASCII wrote:

Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:

anti-smoking propaganda snipped

This has what to do with photography and cameras? You POS TROLL.

The fact that trying to sell used equipment is much more difficult if the
previous owner was a smoker, unless a sepia tint is something of value.

And more people die from car accidents than smoking. (BTW: most smokers
never die from smoking related illnesses). So by this logic of yours, all
people should stop driving cars because camera equipment that they carry in
their car is much more difficult to resell after its been in a car
accident. Driving is not a requirement of life, it's a choice, but it puts
more people in hospitals than anything. Not to mention the air-pollution in
cities from car exhausts that subjects each citizen of every city to as
many carcinogens as if they had smoked two packs of cigarettes a day just
by inhaling city air. This doesn't even count the amount of lead
contamination in all the soils of every city from the nearly century-long
use of leaded-fuels. Any city lot can be declared a highly contaminated
HAZMAT zone if tested for lead. Did you not know this? Driving of ALL cars
should be made ILLEGAL by your logic.

(I've no doubt that the lead in city-soils will lead to the downfall of
humanity no different than the use of lead-pipes did in Rome. All of you
show signs of major brain-damage already, you just don't realize it.)

Holy ****, you fools are the most ignorant and childishly manipulative
trolls on earth.

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:13:05 -0700, ASCII wrote:

Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:

anti-smoking propaganda snipped

This has what to do with photography and cameras? You POS TROLL.

The fact that trying to sell used equipment is much more difficult if the
previous owner was a smoker, unless a sepia tint is something of value.

Not if the buyer is a smoker too.

Simple fact is that smoking is not illegal. It should not BE illegal
either. Take a look back at history please. We never do that with more
than curiosity because we never learn from the history we view. Why?
Because we are too damned self assured that *WE* won't let that happen
the way WE want to repeat history!

Prohibition did not work. It taught us that you cannot legislate
morality. You cannot inforce legislated morality either.

Make no mistake though..... politicians and criminals have learned
that you CAN profit from legislated morality!!

You buy a lense that's coated with smoke.... CAVET EMPTOR my friend!
Why not sit back and deride YOUR purchasing technics rather than the
OTHER persons exercise in free choice?

I'll tell you why. VERY FEW people can point the skinny finger of
truth at themselves and accept total responsability for the
consequences of their actions.

Rich bought something sight unseen and cannot accept the fact that he
****ed up! Being the modern man of deinal of personal responsability
he MUST blame the seller for being a Godless smoker. That way he is
assuring himself and those willing to buy into his delusion that he is
faultless.

Sorry Rich. I am not buying into it.

Now THAT'S how you out a troll!