A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

(OT) Attn: David Brooks - last time...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th 19, 10:11 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.2600,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 346
Default (OT) Attn: David Brooks - last time...

"David B." "David news Fri, 04 Jan 2019 12:54:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 04/01/2019 00:34, Diesel wrote:
"David B." "David
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 02/01/2019 09:15, Diesel wrote:
David,


MID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154639572600

They aren't pleased with you...I'd suggest you for once in your
life, pay attention to the warning I provided you in another
reply. I don't owe you that, but, I (unlike you) can prove the
Anoncoward lies a considerable amount of time about me,
whenever I want to take the time and tear one or more of it's
posts to shreds with facts countering it's claims.

I care only for the TRUTH, Dustin.


Then why did you have a problem with my signature in the past?
What specifically isn't true about it's contents?


Regardless of the truth or otherwise of the content, you know full
well that you should NOT do what you have done.


So you lied then? When you wrote you cared only for the truth. The
truth is, you are a very well known stalker, and, copyright infringer.
You've demonstrated taking pride in doing both things previously. Upto
and including posting copyrighted material to usenet, after having
valid dmca served on you, multiple times. None of which you sought fit
to challenge within the ten day time period.

What I've done has been in response to your actions. I didn't start
with you, David. Prior to 2007, I didn't even know you existed.
Contrary to your blog, you aren't 'exposing' me over a decade later.
You're ****ed off at me and that's why the blog exists. You've known of
me since 2007, Your blog isn't even a month old yet, David. The math
doesn't add up. Most of your blog, as I've said all along, isn't true.

You're using it as an excuse to continue with more aggressive stalking
efforts, originally because I refused to alter my signature. Even after
doing so for several days, your intentionally misleading blog still
remains, as is. That doesn't tell me you're interested in any truth, or
peace, or anything else like that. You have something else in
mind...and I can just about guess on the first try what that might be.

That's the truth David, whether you like it or not.

Usenet readers will see it much more as a poor reflection on YOU,
Dustin, not me.


I don't know about that. Thanks to my efforts to warn others, more
people know you as a troll now and won't interact with you. That
doesn't seem to be a poor reflection on me. However, your own actions,
with regard mostly to my digital property does reflect very poorly on
you. Especially amongst those you've tried to interact with who are
into digital photography/video and respect an individuals copyrights to
their own material. You have demonstrated, multiple times, that you do
not.

You initially had rec.photo.digital and the other binaries newsgroup
snowed. That's not the case anymore. They know what you are now and are
acting accordingly. You might have a blackmail created blog for me,
but, thanks to the efforts of several warning people about you, you
won't succeed in learning enough about others to stalk them in the
manner you've stalked several of us, for years now.

Both you and I KNOW that MOST
of what is written about you IS fact.


I don't know what you know, or think you know, but, I do know
that what you think is fact from the remailing coward often
isn't. I also know that you have a bit more than a little bias
towards me due to our past, so as far as you're concerned, any
chance you can to take a shot at me, you're going to do so.
That's your idea of peace in the new year.


I'd have thought you'd have had enough of fighting with me by now.


I'm not fighting with you, stalker. I'm just being candid and honest.

You've done a great deal of stalking. You can spint that into
research if you think anyone who knows about you is actually dumb
enough to believe that. Posting a gsv of what you thought was my
house, isn't research.


People who KNOW me Dustin, know that I really AM one of life's
'good guys'.


I can't agree with that. Various people you know irl have told me a
great deal about you; some of which I shared on usenet. Not much of it
was good, and, I didn't get the impression they thought of you as one
of lifes good guys either. Quite the contrary, your obsessive drinking
cost you atleast one real life friendship that as far as I know, you've
still not been able to mend. Despite having tried.

And again, you ignore the comment I made about posting a gsv of what
you thought was my house; multiple times now, isn't by any stretch,
legitimate research, David. It's stalking. Real life, stalking.

Oh, but you don't stop there. No, you invite others to HELP YOU STALK
via your own blog! Including screen shots of pay sites where you (I
don't believe for a second someone did it for you) have entered my
information, but, so far, haven't forked over cash for a copy of it.

Hell, you even went so far as to post the address I provided to vimeo
for the DMCA notice I filed because you were hosting an altered version
of my copyrighted video without my permission; knowingly without my
permission! And, you've acknowledged doing that in a previous reply.

How in what possible way is any of those actions, research, David?

[snip personal attack used as a diversion from my comment concerning
gsv posting]

You don't seem to recognise the difference between the posting of
an address (which I did NOT do way back) and the insignificant
act of converting that to a gsv.


Ahh, but it wasn't an insignificant act. You admitted that Aardvark
explained why I took issue with what you did, not that you didn't
already know from that supposed 'research' you did prior to contacting
me, and during the time in which you corresponded with me via email.
You knew of my background, you knew why I wouldn't be comfortable with
my house address being published. So, what do you go and do? You take a
copy of some asshats doxing efforts, convert that into a gsv, and ask
if it's my ****ing house in MULTIPLE NEWSGROUPS as a new subject for
each; not crossposted, an actual new post for each newsgroup!

And, perhaps it was simply a matter of timing, but, you didn't opt to
create those posts until after I repeatedly turned down your requests
and eventual payment offer to essentially, obtain access I wasn't
normally granted on two sites and explore them in great detail. All
under the guise of you thinking they had malware. I offered to examine
any and all malware samples and/or urls pointing to viable malware that
you were willing to send me. NOT ONE SINGLE TIME DID YOU SEND EITHER.

Instead, you expected me to explore both of the entire sites, using
access beyond that of a normal user account. in other words, cracking
their security or what they had for security and nosing around someone
elses system, to report back to you what I found. I told you from the
getgo, I wasn't into that stuff anymore, I'd been retired from blackhat
activities for a very long time. But I continued to tell you that I'd
be more than happy to analyze any links you thought pointed to
malicious software and/or any software you thought was malicious in
nature that I could obtain a copy of. I also told you that I wasn't
going to go on a fishing expedition, because I didn't have that kind of
free time (and I still don't!) and wasn't going to be using the
knowledge I have to go places on those systems I couldn't normally go.

Just because I can do something David, doesn't mean I will. You and I
differ on the concept of ethics and morals, too. You think it's
perfectly okay to trespass onto other peoples gear and do as you damn
well like. I do not. You are a guest on their board/network/site; You
don't own it, you don't have any rights to it. They can tell you to
**** off anytime they like for any reason they like, including none
whatsoever. It's their system, their rules. You have a problem with
that and you have since atleast the time I've known you.

You don't respect other peoples systems anymore so than you do other
peoples digital property. And you sure as hell don't respect other
peoples privacy.

Sure, I made some serious mistakes along the way and I went so far as
to write some malicious software of my own, back in my late teens/early
twenties. Unlike you though, I smartened the **** up and quit doing
stupid ****.

The contents of your blog, heh, isn't research either.


Without the research, I couldn't have come up with my Blog
comments. As far as I'm aware, everything there is true and
factual.


I've written a semi lengthy post, previously, describing the 'factual
errors' shall we say with your blog previously, David. Suffice to say,
your blog doesn't contain much factual information. And you aren't
being honest (now) with how it came to be in existance. That had
nothing to do with any 'research' either.

With you, nothing changed. With me, I gave you three or so days
just to see for myself, if you were bsing about peace as I
thought you were. Turned out to be exactly what I expected.


Perhaps you need to develop a little more patience?


I need to do nothing of the sort. It didn't take you three days from
the time you threatened me with the blog the first time to create it.
Nor did it take you three days each time you threatened me with
additional material. Or, have you forgotten doing all of that?

I haven't. I won't anytime soon, either.

the blog and your wiseass comments remained. Was your idea
of peace nothing more than my removing my signature and you
leaving things as they are? If that's what you were thinking,
heh, don't bother suggesting it again.


I have removed my Blog comments from my signature (and NOT yet put
them back!)


Perhaps you're confused, then? Removing the url to your signature
doesn't make things 'okay', David. If you're just going to continue
dicking around, I'll just restore the old signature on a permanent
basis and resume the actions I had planned to take towards you.


--
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154631875900
Scots are tightwads who are saving up to become Jewish.
  #2  
Old January 5th 19, 05:34 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.2600,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware
David B.[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default (OT) Attn: David Brooks - last time...

On 05/01/2019 09:11, Diesel wrote:
[....]
Perhaps you're confused, then? Removing the url to your signature
doesn't make things 'okay', David. If you're just going to continue
dicking around, I'll just restore the old signature on a permanent
basis and resume the actions I had planned to take towards you.


You didn't answer this point:-

"How can I make you understand that I don't CARE which house you live in
- any more than I care in which house Aardvark lived in before he died.
The general area/town is all that was needed for my purposes."


--
David B.
  #3  
Old January 5th 19, 10:01 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Nomen Nescio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 184
Default (OT) Attn: David Brooks - last time...

In article
"David B." "David wrote:

On 05/01/2019 09:11, Diesel wrote:
[....]
Perhaps you're confused, then? Removing the url to your signature
doesn't make things 'okay', David. If you're just going to continue
dicking around, I'll just restore the old signature on a permanent
basis and resume the actions I had planned to take towards you.


You didn't answer this point:-

"How can I make you understand that I don't CARE which house you live in
- any more than I care in which house Aardvark lived in before he died.
The general area/town is all that was needed for my purposes."


--
David B.


And I thought for a moment or two there was hope for you.

I was wrong. DuckTurd continues to play you like a marionette with
his hand up your butt.

He still DEMANDS CONTROL! With that CONTROL comes further OBEDIENCE.

CONTROL is the #1 demand of a psychopathic personality.

You *will* answer his questions regarding his fabricated stories,
comprised of fabricated "facts".

You haven't learned a damn thing. Another ten years will go by and
you'll still be responding to a psycho who cares NOTHING about the
truth.

What he cares about is your undivided attention.

That's the difference between you and The Anon Coward. He doesn't
want *my* attention, because Google and HowardKnight are replete
with the TRUTH about his sick monster.

So, you keep up your "understanding" nature with this terminally
evil individual, and you will end up - so to speak - in the arena
with the lions circling. From what I've witnessed over the last
week, even then you will be in denial because you think the road to
paradise is one requiring lions or evil to devour Good. If that were
the case, your past countrymen would have laid down their arms and
allowed Herr Schicklgruber to reign.

Bye-bye, back to the mines.

- The Anon Coward -

  #4  
Old January 6th 19, 09:41 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.2600,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 346
Default (OT) Attn: David Brooks - last time...

"David B." "David
Sat, 05 Jan 2019 16:34:30 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 05/01/2019 09:11, Diesel wrote:
[....]
Perhaps you're confused, then? Removing the url to your signature
doesn't make things 'okay', David. If you're just going to
continue dicking around, I'll just restore the old signature on a
permanent basis and resume the actions I had planned to take
towards you.


You didn't answer this point:-


Is there any particular reason you haven't responded to any of the
questions or points I raised in my previous reply, David?

Other than to play games, maybe?



--
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154631875900
Hail / Praise / Ia / **** / Grep / Eat Eris / 'Bob' / Cthulhu / The
Conspiracy / Kibo / Spam
  #5  
Old January 6th 19, 01:45 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.2600,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware
David B.[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default (OT) Attn: David Brooks - last time...

On 06/01/2019 08:41, Diesel wrote:
"David B." "David
Sat, 05 Jan 2019 16:34:30 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 05/01/2019 09:11, Diesel wrote:
[....]
Perhaps you're confused, then? Removing the url to your signature
doesn't make things 'okay', David. If you're just going to
continue dicking around, I'll just restore the old signature on a
permanent basis and resume the actions I had planned to take
towards you.


You didn't answer this point:-


Is there any particular reason you haven't responded to any of the
questions or points I raised in my previous reply, David?


I've not felt much inclined to waste time in this fantasy world whilst
having such a rotten cold.

Other than to play games, maybe?


I'm still considering which way to play this, Dustin.

I'll hopefully be feeling better soon and will be able to make a
sensible judgement call.

--
David B.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
David Brooks aka the stalking weasel nospam Digital Photography 78 July 2nd 17 09:30 AM
David Brooks aka the stalking weasel Eric Stevens Digital Photography 1 May 25th 17 06:50 AM
David Brooks can be an interesting person... Diesel Digital Photography 14 May 24th 17 02:01 PM
Random Thoughts from Brooks Jensen Annika1980 35mm Photo Equipment 5 February 3rd 07 12:06 PM
Brooks Institute of Photography Matt Clara Medium Format Photography Equipment 19 March 20th 06 03:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.