If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sony Cybershot P100 VX '640x480' movie mode is fake
I bought a Nikon Coolpix 3700 for its 640x480/30fps movie mode. I
returned it because of the notorious sync problem (audio lags video by 270ms). Got the P100, but 640 movie images appeared soft, 3700's were much more detailed (chalk and cheese). Some research on the web found the claim below, that Sony's 640 VX is only interpolated 320x240. Suspiciously, the P100 offers only 640 and 160 modes--no 320 option--I'm guessing to prevent direct comparison. Is this outright deception from "It's a Sony"? I was unhappy about this enough to return an otherwise very good P&S camera and buy back the 3700 (AU$200 cheaper, and I'll correct the lag with an editor; I want and use true hi res video). See also: "Here's the skinny on the new MPEG-VX 640 x 480 movie recording mode. It doesn't look any better than 320x240 movies!!!! "The MPEG-VX mode is an interpolated MPEG-HQX 320x240. And trust me.....I have tried and tried and tried to look for any difference between the VX and HQX (320x240) or even HQ (also 320x240) movies. There just simply isn't any discernable difference. I've even done back to back comparisons between the three (using a DSC-P1 and DSC-P9), and I have yet to find any difference. "The most compelling evidence of interpolation is that the recording times for a 128MB memory stick are identical for MPEG-HQX and MPEG-VX. " http://howstuffworks.shopping.com/xP...D-104205946500 Mark PS Fine mode refers to frame rate, not resolution. The three P100 movie modes a 1. VX Fine - 640 x 480 pixels, 30 fps 2. VX Standard - 640 x 480 pixels, 16 fps 3. Low res mode - 160 x 112 pixels, ? fps My comments refer to 1. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
It's not the first time Sony's marketing department got the best
of them... Our F-717, with its "16FPS" movie mode for example.. We wondered why it was horribly jerky, and discovered it's because every third frame is simply a duplicate of the second frame. Net result = jerky video. "Mark Elkington" wrote in message ... I bought a Nikon Coolpix 3700 for its 640x480/30fps movie mode. I returned it because of the notorious sync problem (audio lags video by 270ms). Got the P100, but 640 movie images appeared soft, 3700's were much more detailed (chalk and cheese). Some research on the web found the claim below, that Sony's 640 VX is only interpolated 320x240. Suspiciously, the P100 offers only 640 and 160 modes--no 320 option--I'm guessing to prevent direct comparison. Is this outright deception from "It's a Sony"? I was unhappy about this enough to return an otherwise very good P&S camera and buy back the 3700 (AU$200 cheaper, and I'll correct the lag with an editor; I want and use true hi res video). See also: "Here's the skinny on the new MPEG-VX 640 x 480 movie recording mode. It doesn't look any better than 320x240 movies!!!! "The MPEG-VX mode is an interpolated MPEG-HQX 320x240. And trust me.....I have tried and tried and tried to look for any difference between the VX and HQX (320x240) or even HQ (also 320x240) movies. There just simply isn't any discernable difference. I've even done back to back comparisons between the three (using a DSC-P1 and DSC-P9), and I have yet to find any difference. "The most compelling evidence of interpolation is that the recording times for a 128MB memory stick are identical for MPEG-HQX and MPEG-VX. " http://howstuffworks.shopping.com/xP...D-104205946500 Mark PS Fine mode refers to frame rate, not resolution. The three P100 movie modes a 1. VX Fine - 640 x 480 pixels, 30 fps 2. VX Standard - 640 x 480 pixels, 16 fps 3. Low res mode - 160 x 112 pixels, ? fps My comments refer to 1. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Seymore" wrote in message
... If you want video, buy a DV camcorder... If you want stills, buy a still cam. It's that easy! They used to say if you want wide angle, buy a wide angle lens, if you want telephoto, buy a telephoto lens - zooms are no good. But the technology got better and today almost all cameras are sold with zoom lenses. Your advice about still and video would have been right two years ago. Maybe it's right today, and maybe not. In a couple of years it will be dead wrong. Alan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Its hard to say that something will always be so...but its hard to imagine a
day that a camera will be able to do both well. Of course it only needs to please the person who bought it...and some people are easily pleased. "Alan Meyer" wrote in message ... "Seymore" wrote in message ... If you want video, buy a DV camcorder... If you want stills, buy a still cam. It's that easy! They used to say if you want wide angle, buy a wide angle lens, if you want telephoto, buy a telephoto lens - zooms are no good. But the technology got better and today almost all cameras are sold with zoom lenses. Your advice about still and video would have been right two years ago. Maybe it's right today, and maybe not. In a couple of years it will be dead wrong. Alan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Its hard to say that something will always be so...but its hard to imagine a
day that a camera will be able to do both well. Of course it only needs to please the person who bought it...and some people are easily pleased. "Alan Meyer" wrote in message ... "Seymore" wrote in message ... If you want video, buy a DV camcorder... If you want stills, buy a still cam. It's that easy! They used to say if you want wide angle, buy a wide angle lens, if you want telephoto, buy a telephoto lens - zooms are no good. But the technology got better and today almost all cameras are sold with zoom lenses. Your advice about still and video would have been right two years ago. Maybe it's right today, and maybe not. In a couple of years it will be dead wrong. Alan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Seymore" wrote in message ...
If you want video, buy a DV camcorder... If you want stills, buy a still cam. It's that easy! I'm afraid it isn't. I own a Sony digital video camera. Too often it simply isn't with you: compact as it is, it's just not a shirt-pocket/belt-pouch/hand-bag option. The convergence of video and stills in an ultracomact digicam has *revolutionised* my family's recording of events. The 35mm SLR and MiniDV are technically superior, but the little Coolpix 3700 is in practice light years ahead - i.e. we regularly take it with us and actually use it. Mark |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I just got one of these and look forward to comparing its video mode to that
of my Fuji S602 which DOES apparently have 640x480 resolution and IS a lousy interpolated 3.2 megapixel still mode camera?? I wonder why none of the review sites mention the reasonably obvious point you state, if it is true? They all review these cameras to the Nth degree and all say that the video mode is great?? (I cant explain why those file sizes should be the same) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I just got one of these and look forward to comparing its video mode to that
of my Fuji S602 which DOES apparently have 640x480 resolution and IS a lousy interpolated 3.2 megapixel still mode camera?? I wonder why none of the review sites mention the reasonably obvious point you state, if it is true? They all review these cameras to the Nth degree and all say that the video mode is great?? (I cant explain why those file sizes should be the same) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Maria Ripanykhazova" wrote in message ...
I just got one of these and look forward to comparing its video mode to that of my Fuji S602 which DOES apparently have 640x480 resolution and IS a lousy interpolated 3.2 megapixel still mode camera?? I wonder why none of the review sites mention the reasonably obvious point you state, if it is true? They all review these cameras to the Nth degree and all say that the video mode is great?? Some digicam reviewers don't even test the video mode, and often those that do give it a disproportionately small coverage. "Oh yeah it has X video mode and I recorded a clip you can download here, only 15MB." Believe me, the difference is real and obvious, enough for me to choose the Coolpix 3700 over the generally superior (though more expensive) P100. Perhaps one third of my holiday images were movies, so true hi-res support matters to me. Mark |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Maria Ripanykhazova" wrote in message ...
I just got one of these and look forward to comparing its video mode to that of my Fuji S602 which DOES apparently have 640x480 resolution and IS a lousy interpolated 3.2 megapixel still mode camera?? I wonder why none of the review sites mention the reasonably obvious point you state, if it is true? They all review these cameras to the Nth degree and all say that the video mode is great?? Some digicam reviewers don't even test the video mode, and often those that do give it a disproportionately small coverage. "Oh yeah it has X video mode and I recorded a clip you can download here, only 15MB." Believe me, the difference is real and obvious, enough for me to choose the Coolpix 3700 over the generally superior (though more expensive) P100. Perhaps one third of my holiday images were movies, so true hi-res support matters to me. Mark |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help! Sony Cybershot - Same Problem on 2 Cameras | Prescriptions | Digital Photography | 22 | December 7th 04 06:47 PM |
Questions regarding Sony Cybershot DSC-P73 and Sony memory sticks | Tongwer | Digital Photography | 9 | October 22nd 04 02:29 PM |
Quality of pics using Burst Mode ? | Tech | Digital Photography | 8 | July 28th 04 07:12 PM |
Sony Cybershot DSC-W1... Bad Camera...Bad Customer Service by Sony... Read on... | unavailable | 35mm Photo Equipment | 38 | June 29th 04 06:45 AM |