MFA?

wrote:

Where did I say anything about ZS being pictorialistic? I said ADAMS
was a pictorialist, and he WAS. Pictorialism evolved parallel to
painting.

troll dribble.

And just where is the guy who started this thread?

Could Nebenzahl and MS be one in the same?

I don't think that's even possible!

On 12/10/2004 6:47 AM Tom Phillips spake thus:

wrote:

Where did I say anything about ZS being pictorialistic? I said ADAMS
was a pictorialist, and he WAS. Pictorialism evolved parallel to
painting.

troll dribble.

And just where is the guy who started this thread?

Could Nebenzahl and MS be one in the same?

Please don't confuse me with that schmo.

I may be many things, but a Bush-supporting Republican ain't one of them.


--
Don't blame Ralph Nader: blame Gavin Newsom.

"Jörgen Persson" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:
Well, if you are only going to elude the discussion, why did
you even get into it? It is up to you to be specific. This is
not a guessing game.

You have stated your view. MS/UC has stated his. I have tried to
state a simplified postmodern view.

You stated nothing at all but a very short nonsequtor!

[...] Sorry but I don't think there is a right or wrong in this
question

Post-modern to be sure, and typical relativist. Nonsense.

and I don't have time to play games.

You have enough time to make wordy, but empty posts.

David Nebenzahl wrote:

On 12/10/2004 6:47 AM Tom Phillips spake thus:

wrote:

Where did I say anything about ZS being pictorialistic? I said ADAMS
was a pictorialist, and he WAS. Pictorialism evolved parallel to
painting.

troll dribble.

And just where is the guy who started this thread?

Could Nebenzahl and MS be one in the same?

Please don't confuse me with that schmo.

I may be many things, but a Bush-supporting Republican ain't one of them.

oh now, let's not define a schmo by his politics, even if it fits

I happen to like _some_ republicans.

jjs wrote:

"Jörgen Persson" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:
Well, if you are only going to elude the discussion, why did
you even get into it? It is up to you to be specific. This is
not a guessing game.

You have stated your view. MS/UC has stated his. I have tried to
state a simplified postmodern view.

You stated nothing at all but a very short nonsequtor!

ah um, it's "non sequitur."


You have enough time to make wordy, but empty posts.

A bit like Stafford's photo/art knowledge...

jjs wrote:

"Jörgen Persson" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:
Well, if you are only going to elude the discussion, why did
you even get into it? It is up to you to be specific. This is
not a guessing game.

You have stated your view. MS/UC has stated his. I have tried to
state a simplified postmodern view.

You stated nothing at all but a very short nonsequtor!

ah um, it's "non sequitur."


You have enough time to make wordy, but empty posts.

A bit like Stafford's photo/art knowledge...

Some of my best friends are D_________.
There's always hope for them....

Some of my best friends are D_________.
There's always hope for them....

Tom Phillips wrote:


If we all ignored the troll he and his posts will go away. Please ignore
him.
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------