If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:41:43 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2015-07-30 18:36:32 +0000, PeterN said: But I have forgotten the syntax for conditional execution of cammands. ...and you would really have to be careful with regard to those typos you are vulnerable to these days. Heh. I was going to make a similar comment, but I was sure it was beneath this group... |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
On 2015-07-30 21:58:24 +0000, Bill W said:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:41:43 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-07-30 18:36:32 +0000, PeterN said: But I have forgotten the syntax for conditional execution of cammands. ...and you would really have to be careful with regard to those typos you are vulnerable to these days. Heh. I was going to make a similar comment, but I was sure it was beneath this group... Come on! Nothing is beneath this group. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: Probably longer for me. I used to be able to decently do basics in Unix caommand lkine. The operating principle is not all that much different with DOS command lines. Both are fairly simple and quick. But I have forgotten the syntax for conditional execution of cammands. ...and you would really have to be careful with regard to those typos you are vulnerable to these days. no ****. one minor typo and you could be looking at a complete reinstall. Bull**** it's definitely not bull****. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: Of course you have to keep track of the stuff! not by file name, you don't. You have to keep track at least to the extent that no matter what system you are using you have to remember how it works and you have to remember what it is about the image you are looking for that enabled you to place (and hence to later find) it in the system you have created. that's not keeping track of the stuff. obviously you need to know what the photos you want to see or work with are about, but that's it. the actual file name or where it's stored, local or remote, makes no difference. the computer handles all of that for you. Savageduck (and some others) use folders based on date. That works for them but would almost totally useless for me. Once a year or two has gone I wouldn't have a clue about when I took it. But I do remember the content of all my images (or the groups of images) and file them on that basis. I don't generally bother to change the file names. This practice predates my use of any 'asset manager' and I have no trouble finding any photograph I want. that's perfect for an asset manager. you can search on what you want to see rather than the name or date, which as you say, is something people won't remember, and the asset manager does the rest. I can see the advantage of an asset manager but I find the need to hang key words on individual images to be a pain in the neck that I can do without. "Let the computer do the work" says nospam. That's all very well but no matter what system you use you too will have to do a substantial part of the work required to enable the computer to do the work for you. Asset managers are not the totally magic bullet that some would have them be. asset managers aren't perfect (nothing is) but they go a long way in getting there. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:57:10 -0700, isw wrote:
In article , nospam wrote: managing photos (or any asset) via the filesystem is primitive and inefficient. that's why asset mangers exist, which are designed and optimized to manage assets. not only are they more efficient but they do a lot more too. there is no downside. Well, there is, and it's a big one. What do you do, some years from now, when you have even more photos than now, all carefully organized with AssetManager, and for whatever reason, that program becomes no longer available for any platform you then use? All your "organization" is out the window, is what. While, if you had named the files in some rational (to you) way, any viable OS that could store them could easily display them in the way you set up. Isaac Your scenario might be a bit overwrought, and I definitely am a fan of the forward march of technology, but I still agree with you. There are a lot of very cruel posters here who look down on us Luddites who are so careful that they believe in a bit of redundancy, but I do not care for black boxes, and if I didn't write the software, in this case the asset manager, it's a black box. I just went through a long couple of weeks going through old computer files, many of which I could not open without a lot of research. I mean, after you've taken a bunch of photos, it's just not that hard to create a clearly named folder, and import all of the photos directly into it, and then rename them, if that's what you want. After that, I can easily import them into any app that I want, LR, DXO, PSP, or into all of them. I just use the folder name for the collection name. Redundancy, redundancy, redundancy. (I know, that's redundant.) I realize that it can be (and has been) argued that it's pointless, but so was converting all of my Works files, and all of my files stored on a Zip drive. Until I learned the hard way it wasn't. If one does not spend every waking hour following the status of current hardware & software, one can find himself in a bind one day. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
In article , Bill W
wrote: What do you do, some years from now, when you have even more photos than now, all carefully organized with AssetManager, and for whatever reason, that program becomes no longer available for any platform you then use? All your "organization" is out the window, is what. While, if you had named the files in some rational (to you) way, any viable OS that could store them could easily display them in the way you set up. Your scenario might be a bit overwrought, and I definitely am a fan of the forward march of technology, but I still agree with you. There are a lot of very cruel posters here who look down on us Luddites who are so careful that they believe in a bit of redundancy, but I do not care for black boxes, and if I didn't write the software, in this case the asset manager, it's a black box. I just went through a long couple of weeks going through old computer files, many of which I could not open without a lot of research. then you have to stick with plain text and jpeg files. that's *really* limiting and a *huge* price to pay for something that might never occur. photoshop is 25 years old with no sign of it going away any time soon. lightroom is 10 years old with no sign of it going away either. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:56:02 -0400, PeterN
wrote: On 7/30/2015 3:13 PM, nospam wrote: In article 2015073011414326671-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: This requires pretty good skills with string manipulation in the command line. Not common these days. (It would take me an hour to get there again - been too long). Probably longer for me. I used to be able to decently do basics in Unix caommand lkine. The operating principle is not all that much different with DOS command lines. Both are fairly simple and quick. But I have forgotten the syntax for conditional execution of cammands. ...and you would really have to be careful with regard to those typos you are vulnerable to these days. no ****. one minor typo and you could be looking at a complete reinstall. Gee dad, it's a Wurlitzer! It's funny you'd say that. I have an Arturia Wurly V software synth, and I've had nothing but problems with it. At least 3 reinstalls so far. It's those damn arrogant French software companies. Them, and DXO. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:21:09 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Bill W wrote: What do you do, some years from now, when you have even more photos than now, all carefully organized with AssetManager, and for whatever reason, that program becomes no longer available for any platform you then use? All your "organization" is out the window, is what. While, if you had named the files in some rational (to you) way, any viable OS that could store them could easily display them in the way you set up. Your scenario might be a bit overwrought, and I definitely am a fan of the forward march of technology, but I still agree with you. There are a lot of very cruel posters here who look down on us Luddites who are so careful that they believe in a bit of redundancy, but I do not care for black boxes, and if I didn't write the software, in this case the asset manager, it's a black box. I just went through a long couple of weeks going through old computer files, many of which I could not open without a lot of research. then you have to stick with plain text and jpeg files. No, not stick with, but if one wants to be really careful, text files along with Word, or whatever. that's *really* limiting and a *huge* price to pay for something that might never occur. It's not limiting if it's redundant, but yes, there is a price to pay, but not huge. I sometimes type a document into a basic text editor, and then paste that into Word, email, a web page, etc. In this case, it's not to protect the original document, but I do end up with a copy I can open with anything. photoshop is 25 years old with no sign of it going away any time soon. lightroom is 10 years old with no sign of it going away either. I remember an investment class many years ago where the instructor made a similar remark about IBM. "Can you even imagine IBM disappearing?" It was only a few years later that they almost did. But to be clear, I don't expect LR or PS to go away in my lifetime. I just happen to think that paranoia is healthy. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:21:09 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Bill W wrote: What do you do, some years from now, when you have even more photos than now, all carefully organized with AssetManager, and for whatever reason, that program becomes no longer available for any platform you then use? All your "organization" is out the window, is what. While, if you had named the files in some rational (to you) way, any viable OS that could store them could easily display them in the way you set up. Your scenario might be a bit overwrought, and I definitely am a fan of the forward march of technology, but I still agree with you. There are a lot of very cruel posters here who look down on us Luddites who are so careful that they believe in a bit of redundancy, but I do not care for black boxes, and if I didn't write the software, in this case the asset manager, it's a black box. I just went through a long couple of weeks going through old computer files, many of which I could not open without a lot of research. then you have to stick with plain text and jpeg files. that's *really* limiting and a *huge* price to pay for something that might never occur. It has already occurred to me. I have a large number of Photopaint files which I can no longer open in Windows. I have a smaller number Paintshop Pro files which will be inaccessible in the forseeable future. I keep finished print' files as high quality jpg files. For all the rest I rely on raw files as the basic backstop. photoshop is 25 years old with no sign of it going away any time soon. lightroom is 10 years old with no sign of it going away either. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Photo file rename by to date and time taken
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:08:39 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Probably longer for me. I used to be able to decently do basics in Unix caommand lkine. The operating principle is not all that much different with DOS command lines. Both are fairly simple and quick. But I have forgotten the syntax for conditional execution of cammands. ...and you would really have to be careful with regard to those typos you are vulnerable to these days. no ****. one minor typo and you could be looking at a complete reinstall. Bull**** it's definitely not bull****. Renaming a bunch of image files can lead to needing a complete reinstall? I still say Bull****. I suppose now you are going to redifine what you mean by a complete reinstall. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What prog will put time and date of file onto JPG image? | Peter[_9_] | Digital Photography | 2 | May 10th 08 06:06 AM |
changing file date and time | N.Coffey | Digital Photography | 4 | April 11th 07 07:26 PM |
Program to Rename photos to Date and Time taken??? | Bud Snavely | Digital Photography | 2 | February 9th 05 04:48 AM |
Rename file to date pic taken - software ? | Andy100 | Digital Photography | 12 | December 2nd 04 01:22 PM |
Free file date/time "toucher" software? | jersie0 | Digital Photography | 6 | September 6th 04 03:29 AM |