If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
Well it happened...I'm a traitor.
I've been seriously pondering a move to a larger camera body from the diminutive Canon XT the last few months, and today a friend pushed me to the edge with an offer to buy my Canon gear. So I jumped. I sold him my Canon Rebel XT body and all of my Canon lenses including 17-40 and 70-200 f/4 models, along with my Canon specific accessories, flash, remote, memory cards, spare bag, etc. He now has everything he needs to go out and shoot digital, and he's a happy camper. So I went out after work and bought the Nikon D80 body, SB-600, memory cards, and remote. I stopped by my friends place on the way home to pick up his used Nikon 18-70 and 50mm f/1.8 lenses. I also borrowed his 80-200 D to play with till the weekend. I broke about even on the deal, give or take a night at the bar. I will have to buy a telephoto lense, but I can live with that. All I can say is, "wow"...the difference in handling and usability is dramatic. Image quality is similar as I expected, but the big thing is the viewfinder - it almost feels like going back to full frame. And the responsiveness is surprising. I figured it wouldn't be much of an improvement over the XT, but the D80 is a tad faster in everything it does. Obviously the loss of the wonderful Canon 70-200 f/4 L is the only thing I miss so far, but hopefully I can make it up with the new 70-300 VR when it arrives, if it's good enough. I'll still have access to my friends 70-200 f/2.8 VR and other sweet glass if needed, but the small 70-300 VR and 18-70 will be great for travel. I feel like a kid with a new toy...can't wait for the weekend. :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
So I jumped. I sold him my Canon Rebel XT body
So I went out after work and bought the Nikon D80 body, All I can say is, "wow"... To be fair, you've gone from an early 2005 camera to a current model which costs significantly more than the Canon did when it came out. Hardly surprising such an upgrade feels like a jump in quality - that's exactly what it is. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
Derek Fountain wrote: So I jumped. I sold him my Canon Rebel XT body So I went out after work and bought the Nikon D80 body, All I can say is, "wow"... To be fair, you've gone from an early 2005 camera to a current model which costs significantly more than the Canon did when it came out. Hardly surprising such an upgrade feels like a jump in quality - that's exactly what it is. Yeah, apart from the viewfinder (which is admitedly better on the D80), I'm hard pressed to think of many things he mentions that he'd not have gained by jumping to a 30D. I'm not saying that the 30D is a better camera, but honestly I can't imagine giving up all of that glass so lightly. The irony is that I moved to my 20D from a D70 with the exact same 18-70 and 50/1.8, and I never looked back (in part because of the Canon glass I chose to invest in... the Nikon *lenses* were always fine), mostly because the 20D was a better camera than the D70 in every way I could think to measure. But everyone has different preferences, I suppose. To be honest, I imagine having seperate dials for shutter and iris (vs the system on the Rebels) is reason enough to be excited. Will |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
Yeah, apart from the viewfinder (which is admitedly better on the D80),
I'm hard pressed to think of many things he mentions that he'd not have gained by jumping to a 30D. I'm not saying that the 30D is a better camera, but honestly I can't imagine giving up all of that glass so lightly. Yes, I'd have thought with a 17-40mm f/4 L and a 70-200mm f/4 L there were better upgrade paths. I have both of those lenses and I'd need hell of a deal to get me to part with them. Still, he seems happy enough with improvements to handling, usability and viewfinder. Let's hope he's still as happy when he sees the images his new equipment produces. That L glass he's traded in will take some matching. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
Derek Fountain wrote:
Yeah, apart from the viewfinder (which is admitedly better on the D80), I'm hard pressed to think of many things he mentions that he'd not have gained by jumping to a 30D. I'm not saying that the 30D is a better camera, but honestly I can't imagine giving up all of that glass so lightly. Yes, I'd have thought with a 17-40mm f/4 L and a 70-200mm f/4 L there were better upgrade paths. I have both of those lenses and I'd need hell of a deal to get me to part with them. Still, he seems happy enough with improvements to handling, usability and viewfinder. Let's hope he's still as happy when he sees the images his new equipment produces. That L glass he's traded in will take some matching. Don't Nikon make any good lenses in those f/l ranges? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
Don't Nikon make any good lenses in those f/l ranges?
I don't know the Nikon range, but I'd have thought that they can match Canon in most areas (and vice versa). My point was that the OP *had* those 2 'L' lenses, and I doubt if Nikon has anything better than them for the money he got by selling them. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
On Oct 26, 6:56 am, frederick wrote: Derek Fountain wrote: Yeah, apart from the viewfinder (which is admitedly better on the D80), I'm hard pressed to think of many things he mentions that he'd not have gained by jumping to a 30D. I'm not saying that the 30D is a better camera, but honestly I can't imagine giving up all of that glass so lightly. Yes, I'd have thought with a 17-40mm f/4 L and a 70-200mm f/4 L there were better upgrade paths. I have both of those lenses and I'd need hell of a deal to get me to part with them. Still, he seems happy enough with improvements to handling, usability and viewfinder. Let's hope he's still as happy when he sees the images his new equipment produces. That L glass he's traded in will take some matching.Don't Nikon make any good lenses in those f/l ranges? What Nikon is missing is a really good 80-200 f4, they have several amateur lenses, a 55-200 plastic lens, a 70-210 f4-5.6, or the 70-300s. There was a 70-210 f4 in the '80s, nice lens but slow focusing, since discontinuing this lens Nikon has felt if you want a pro lens get an f2.8. Which they make 2 both excellent lenses, an 80-200 f2.8 and a 70-200 f2.8 with VR. Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
wrote in message
ups.com... Derek Fountain wrote: So I jumped. I sold him my Canon Rebel XT body So I went out after work and bought the Nikon D80 body, All I can say is, "wow"... To be fair, you've gone from an early 2005 camera to a current model which costs significantly more than the Canon did when it came out. Hardly surprising such an upgrade feels like a jump in quality - that's exactly what it is. Yeah, apart from the viewfinder (which is admitedly better on the D80), I'm hard pressed to think of many things he mentions that he'd not have gained by jumping to a 30D. The 30D is a very good camera, but it just doesn't have the handling of the Nikon. There are a few minor things I preferred in the Nikon as well, like a better menu display. The cost was also a factor as the 30D costs $350 CDN more than the D80. That difference paid for the new flash and remote. I'm not saying that the 30D is a better camera, but honestly I can't imagine giving up all of that glass so lightly. It wasn't an easy decision...the 70-200 f/4 is an excellent lense and will be missed. But everything else I was able to match with Nikon gear and break even on the deal. If my friend had not been interested in my setup, I would still have the Canon - it's all about timing I guess. I also have access to the best glass that Nikon has to offer through a friend who is a pro and uses some very nice gear. I managed to pickup the used 18-70 and 50mm from him for only $100, which was also part of the incentive to switch. The 18-70 is almost as good as the Canon 17-40, so I'm at the same image quality there. The telephoto is the only area where I'll take a financial loss, but to me it's worth it for the better handling. Speaking of image quality, the Nikon is great in RAW. I used the 50mm f/1.8 to test for sharpness and find the JPG images are a bit soft, similar to how the D70s would soften them while keeping high resolution and sharpness in the RAW files. But I turned up the sharpness a notch for in-camera JPG and it's more than adequate for quick snaps. For more serious shots I shoot RAW anyways. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
"Derek Fountain" wrote in message
reenews.net... So I jumped. I sold him my Canon Rebel XT body So I went out after work and bought the Nikon D80 body, All I can say is, "wow"... To be fair, you've gone from an early 2005 camera to a current model which costs significantly more than the Canon did when it came out. Actually the D80 costs exactly $100 CDN more than the XT did when it arrived in Feb 2005, which I don't consider a significant amount when you're paying a grand for a camera. :-) In contrast, the Canon 30D costs another $350 CDN more than the Nikon but doesn't offer anything extra to justify that price, except the magnesium body which isn't important to me. I would have saved some money staying with the Canon lenses, but I couldn't justify the handling contraints for what it would save me in costs. I also didn't plan on upgrading for at least another year or more, but after using my friends D200 a few times and trying the D80, I was hooked on the viewfinder. I should also mention the menu and display is much better on the Nikon too. Hardly surprising such an upgrade feels like a jump in quality - that's exactly what it is. It's not the technology that attracted me, but the design and handling, and the much improved viewfinder. Even if Canon had made the same viewfinder, the way the Nikon feels in my hands is better than the Canon, which is a very subjective thing. About 10 years ago when I bought my first SLR film camera, I didn't like the feel of the grips on the Nikon consumer bodies (liked the pro models though), which is why I went with Canon. In fact, Minolta had the best grips of all three, but I didn't like what they had to offer at that time and price point. Now the handling has improved and I prefer the Nikon grip. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't help it - sorry Canon
In article ,
says... Well it happened...I'm a traitor. I've been seriously pondering a move to a larger camera body from the diminutive Canon XT the last few months, and today a friend pushed me to the edge with an offer to buy my Canon gear. So I jumped. I sold him my Canon Rebel XT body and all of my Canon lenses including 17-40 and 70-200 f/4 models, along with my Canon specific accessories, flash, remote, memory cards, spare bag, etc. He now has everything he needs to go out and shoot digital, and he's a happy camper. So I went out after work and bought the Nikon D80 body, SB-600, memory cards, and remote. I stopped by my friends place on the way home to pick up his used Nikon 18-70 and 50mm f/1.8 lenses. I also borrowed his 80-200 D to play with till the weekend. I broke about even on the deal, give or take a night at the bar. I will have to buy a telephoto lense, but I can live with that. All I can say is, "wow"...the difference in handling and usability is dramatic. Image quality is similar as I expected, but the big thing is the viewfinder - it almost feels like going back to full frame. And the responsiveness is surprising. I figured it wouldn't be much of an improvement over the XT, but the D80 is a tad faster in everything it does. Obviously the loss of the wonderful Canon 70-200 f/4 L is the only thing I miss so far, but hopefully I can make it up with the new 70-300 VR when it arrives, if it's good enough. I'll still have access to my friends 70-200 f/2.8 VR and other sweet glass if needed, but the small 70-300 VR and 18-70 will be great for travel. I feel like a kid with a new toy...can't wait for the weekend. Welcome to the fold. The D80 is a great little camera and you'll be satisfied for many years. Check out the D80 gallery he http://nikongear.com/alb/ I suspect you will be quite disappointed with the 70-300mm VR because it definitely won't be in the same league as the 70-200mm you've been using from both Canon and Nikon. I would suggest cancelling that purchase and going for the 18-200mm VR. -- www.nikongear.com Share, learn, win. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Digital SLR Cameras for sale | camerawarehouse | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 2 | September 2nd 06 06:08 PM |
Using Canon 70-200L F2.8 with X2 Converter | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 7 | October 24th 05 11:27 PM |
Using Canon 70-200L F2.8 with X2 Converter | Bill Hilton | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | October 24th 05 11:27 PM |
FS: Canon Eos Elan II System---MINT! | Jeff K | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | May 2nd 04 09:54 PM |
FA Canon EOS bodies, "L" Lenses, access... | J&C | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | December 20th 03 03:28 AM |