Is Sigma's SD10 at ISO 1600 better than Canon's 1Ds at ISO 100?

"Georgette Preddy" wrote in message
om...
SNIP
Get a chart that doesn't clearly show the 1Ds is worse at
ISO 100 than the SD10 is at ISO 1600.

Problems with your double-negatives?
Indeed, there are only charts that show that the 1Ds is better at ISO 100,
and all the way up to 1250 it is still better than the SD-10.

http://img.dpreview.com/reviews/Cano...ance-graph.gif

1Ds at ISO 100 has 1.2 luminance standard deviation, and the SD-10 has:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/SigmaSD10/Samples/ISO/lumi_graph.gif
4.2 luminance standard deviation.

What's more the SD-10 also misrepresents even more red colors as the ISO is
increased:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Sigm...d10_iso1600.jp
g .

In message ,
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote:

Since Steve Giovenella

It's "Giovanella"; two 'a's and one 'e'.
--


John P Sheehy

In message ,
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote:

Since Steve Giovenella

It's "Giovanella"; two 'a's and one 'e'.
--


John P Sheehy

wrote in message
...
In message ,
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote:

Since Steve Giovenella

It's "Giovanella"; two 'a's and one 'e'.

Try http://centralops.net/co/DomainDossier.aspx , do a "domain whois
record" search on http://www.missionphoto.biz (it is linked to through
http://www.sigmaontour.tk/ ).

Steve Giovenella = "Preddy"

Bart

In message ,
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
In message ,
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote:

Since Steve Giovenella

It's "Giovanella"; two 'a's and one 'e'.

Try http://centralops.net/co/DomainDossier.aspx , do a "domain whois
record" search on http://www.missionphoto.biz (it is linked to through
http://www.sigmaontour.tk/ ).

Steve Giovenella = "Preddy"

That's funny, I could swear he spelled it with two 'a's in
comp.sys.amiga.advocacy.
--


John P Sheehy

wrote in message
...
In message ,
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote:
SNIP
Try http://centralops.net/co/DomainDossier.aspx , do a "domain whois
record" search on http://www.missionphoto.biz (it is linked to through
http://www.sigmaontour.tk/ ).

Steve Giovenella = "Preddy"

That's funny, I could swear he spelled it with two 'a's in
comp.sys.amiga.advocacy.

Ah, but he's known to spread only lies.

Bart

wrote in message
...
In message ,
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote:
SNIP
Try http://centralops.net/co/DomainDossier.aspx , do a "domain whois
record" search on http://www.missionphoto.biz (it is linked to through
http://www.sigmaontour.tk/ ).

Steve Giovenella = "Preddy"

That's funny, I could swear he spelled it with two 'a's in
comp.sys.amiga.advocacy.

Ah, but he's known to spread only lies.

Bart

In article , Georgette
Preddy wrote:

Here is the prosumer Canon 1Ds vs the professional Sigma/Foveon/NSC
SD10 (pro in this sense = Leaf and Foveon only, with Foveon having the
clear edge on noise), same link I posted to start this thread...

Yes, the Foveon has the clear edge on noise...you get lots of it *and*
crappy colors.