If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR v Consumer Image quality
I am in the category of having changed from film slr to consumer
digital for the last 3 years. I am dithering over purchasing a dslr, because image quality is my thing. However, I have been pretty pleased with Nikon and Panasonic Lumix FZ consumer cameras, especially the latter. Considering only image quality, up to A4 prints. DSLR users talk about their superior image quality, but when I go to say, Steves Digicams, and compare on-screen a 200% enlargement of the same image, far greater than real life, I see very little difference in quality between a D70 and a FZ20. Giving up the portability of a consumer camera for a far more expensive DSLR system (my film lenses are Olympus and I'm not impressed with the E300).......is the image quality worth the difference? Or better to wait a year or two yet? DonB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Epson R800 versus 2200 image quality | Ben Kaufman | Digital Photography | 0 | December 31st 04 05:26 AM |
Digicam Video Quality vs. Camcorders, Camcorder Image Quality vs Digicams | Richard Lee | Digital Photography | 21 | August 23rd 04 07:04 PM |
Sigma wins image quality challenge. Bayer user in disbelief. | Georgette Preddy | Digital Photography | 3 | August 7th 04 01:48 PM |
digital cameras and flash = poor image quality?? | michaelb | Digital Photography | 25 | July 3rd 04 08:35 AM |
still image quality | paul flynn | Digital Photography | 1 | June 28th 04 11:07 PM |