A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SD Replacing Compact Flash?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 15th 04, 11:25 AM
Mark B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CF isn't going anywhere soon. The recently released Canon 20D uses it, as
does the new Maxxum 7D. It'll be around in DSLRs for quite a while.

Mark


  #22  
Old September 15th 04, 12:23 PM
Tony Whitaker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"MeepMeep" wrote in message
om...
"Tony Whitaker" wrote in message
link.net...
While it is true that the volume of CF is quite a bit larger than an
SD, meaning that it should always be able to hold more data, the SD
bus protocol looks like it can be faster than CF. This shouldn't be a
surprise because SD is a newer design.

Card testing at www.robgalbraith.com shows that on a Canon 1D mII, the
SD can write RAW files at around 7 MB/sec, whereas the CF can only do
about 4 MB/sec.


But isn't that something that can be fixed on CF cards in the future? I
know in the last year or so, the manufacturers came out with a bunch of
"high speed" CF cards. What's the limiting factor in data transfer speed on
a flash memory card?


  #23  
Old September 15th 04, 12:23 PM
Tony Whitaker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"MeepMeep" wrote in message
om...
"Tony Whitaker" wrote in message
link.net...
While it is true that the volume of CF is quite a bit larger than an
SD, meaning that it should always be able to hold more data, the SD
bus protocol looks like it can be faster than CF. This shouldn't be a
surprise because SD is a newer design.

Card testing at www.robgalbraith.com shows that on a Canon 1D mII, the
SD can write RAW files at around 7 MB/sec, whereas the CF can only do
about 4 MB/sec.


But isn't that something that can be fixed on CF cards in the future? I
know in the last year or so, the manufacturers came out with a bunch of
"high speed" CF cards. What's the limiting factor in data transfer speed on
a flash memory card?


  #24  
Old September 15th 04, 01:26 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark B. wrote:
CF isn't going anywhere soon. The recently released Canon 20D uses it, as
does the new Maxxum 7D. It'll be around in DSLRs for quite a while.

Mark


CF is a great format, compact enough for medium to large cameras, large
enough for easy handling, and easy finding if dropped, and with no limit
on the capacity it can handle. I suspect it will be around for a LONG
time yet. However, SD is a good format for smaller devices, and it has
supplanted the CF card in most of these applications.
  #25  
Old September 15th 04, 01:26 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark B. wrote:
CF isn't going anywhere soon. The recently released Canon 20D uses it, as
does the new Maxxum 7D. It'll be around in DSLRs for quite a while.

Mark


CF is a great format, compact enough for medium to large cameras, large
enough for easy handling, and easy finding if dropped, and with no limit
on the capacity it can handle. I suspect it will be around for a LONG
time yet. However, SD is a good format for smaller devices, and it has
supplanted the CF card in most of these applications.
  #26  
Old September 15th 04, 01:27 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tony Whitaker wrote:
"MeepMeep" wrote in message
om...

"Tony Whitaker" wrote in message
thlink.net...
While it is true that the volume of CF is quite a bit larger than an
SD, meaning that it should always be able to hold more data, the SD
bus protocol looks like it can be faster than CF. This shouldn't be a
surprise because SD is a newer design.

Card testing at www.robgalbraith.com shows that on a Canon 1D mII, the
SD can write RAW files at around 7 MB/sec, whereas the CF can only do
about 4 MB/sec.



But isn't that something that can be fixed on CF cards in the future? I
know in the last year or so, the manufacturers came out with a bunch of
"high speed" CF cards. What's the limiting factor in data transfer speed on
a flash memory card?


Right now, the speed at which the memory cells can be written.
  #27  
Old September 15th 04, 01:27 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tony Whitaker wrote:
"MeepMeep" wrote in message
om...

"Tony Whitaker" wrote in message
thlink.net...
While it is true that the volume of CF is quite a bit larger than an
SD, meaning that it should always be able to hold more data, the SD
bus protocol looks like it can be faster than CF. This shouldn't be a
surprise because SD is a newer design.

Card testing at www.robgalbraith.com shows that on a Canon 1D mII, the
SD can write RAW files at around 7 MB/sec, whereas the CF can only do
about 4 MB/sec.



But isn't that something that can be fixed on CF cards in the future? I
know in the last year or so, the manufacturers came out with a bunch of
"high speed" CF cards. What's the limiting factor in data transfer speed on
a flash memory card?


Right now, the speed at which the memory cells can be written.
  #28  
Old September 15th 04, 01:27 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tony Whitaker wrote:
"MeepMeep" wrote in message
om...

"Tony Whitaker" wrote in message
thlink.net...
While it is true that the volume of CF is quite a bit larger than an
SD, meaning that it should always be able to hold more data, the SD
bus protocol looks like it can be faster than CF. This shouldn't be a
surprise because SD is a newer design.

Card testing at www.robgalbraith.com shows that on a Canon 1D mII, the
SD can write RAW files at around 7 MB/sec, whereas the CF can only do
about 4 MB/sec.



But isn't that something that can be fixed on CF cards in the future? I
know in the last year or so, the manufacturers came out with a bunch of
"high speed" CF cards. What's the limiting factor in data transfer speed on
a flash memory card?


Right now, the speed at which the memory cells can be written.
  #29  
Old September 15th 04, 05:45 PM
Dave Cobb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frankly, I have noticed so many cameras switching to Secure Digital (SD)
cards in place of Compact Flash I'm wondering if Compact Flash is going the
way of Smart Media cards.


I agree with other posters that CF will remain strong for DSLRs, etc
and will probably not go away any time soon.

I also see that compact cameras tend to all be (slowly) moving towards
SD... so if you generally prefer compact cameras SD is hands down the
way to go.

Will Fuji ever get the clue and dump xD??? I don't think they have the
the brand power of Sony to continue to rely on a proprietary card.
They do sell cute little cameras though.

Sony will surely stay with MS and now MS-PRO forever.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kodak dc 4800 with Compact Flash Card jim Digital Photography 8 August 31st 04 03:17 PM
Canon A70 Compact Flash slot pin broken lc Digital Photography 0 July 15th 04 03:26 AM
Compact Flash Memory Card costs Engineer Digital Photography 7 June 25th 04 11:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.