If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:18:55 GMT, "David J Taylor"
wrote: GT40 wrote: [] Btw, the lens isn't a 2.8 at the 12:1 range its a 4.6. No, it's f/2.8 http://www.dpreview.com/news/0407/04...asonicfz20.asp Ok, I was looking at the wromg camera before. Unless you get a 1D series the Canon DSLR's aren't bulky at all. Compare an SLR with a 420mm f/2.8 IS lens (i.e. 280mm f/2.8 lens to provide the same coverage). There is /considerable/ bulk difference. I think you missed the point, just becuase its cheaper doesn't make it better. I don't doubt that an expensive DLSR can take better pictures. Just because it's a DLSR doesn't make it any more suitable. It does in this case, not all cases. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
GT40 wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:18:55 GMT, "David J Taylor" wrote: GT40 wrote: [] Btw, the lens isn't a 2.8 at the 12:1 range its a 4.6. No, it's f/2.8 http://www.dpreview.com/news/0407/04...asonicfz20.asp Ok, I was looking at the wromg camera before. Unless you get a 1D series the Canon DSLR's aren't bulky at all. Compare an SLR with a 420mm f/2.8 IS lens (i.e. 280mm f/2.8 lens to provide the same coverage). There is /considerable/ bulk difference. I think you missed the point, just becuase its cheaper doesn't make it better. I don't doubt that an expensive DLSR can take better pictures. Just because it's a DLSR doesn't make it any more suitable. It does in this case, not all cases. I agree with GT40. Also, what is the shutter lag for the 2 cameras? DSLRs have always been faster. 12x optical zoom, but at what quality? High resolution images from zoom lenses are usually limited to lenses with 3x zoom factors. Finally, the advantage of a DSLR is you can change lenses. Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow. For a P&S, your stuck with the lens and only that lens. To upgrade requires a whole new camera. The main advantage of a P&S is size, weight, and convenience, but it comes with a sacrifice in quality, flexibility, and versatility. I have both, and use what works best for the situation. Roger |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) wrote:
[] I agree with GT40. Also, what is the shutter lag for the 2 cameras? DSLRs have always been faster. 12x optical zoom, but at what quality? High resolution images from zoom lenses are usually limited to lenses with 3x zoom factors. Finally, the advantage of a DSLR is you can change lenses. Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow. For a P&S, your stuck with the lens and only that lens. To upgrade requires a whole new camera. The main advantage of a P&S is size, weight, and convenience, but it comes with a sacrifice in quality, flexibility, and versatility. I have both, and use what works best for the situation. Roger I'm waiting to hear back from the OP, whether $1400 for the same basic capability in a DSLR is worth it over the $450 for the P&S. Remember this was for photographs for a "school newsletter" where I guess the camera might be handed out to school children from time-to-time. I agree with "Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow." but my interpretation of that would be to get the P&S today, and the DLSR tomorrow. Cheers, David |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) wrote:
[] I agree with GT40. Also, what is the shutter lag for the 2 cameras? DSLRs have always been faster. 12x optical zoom, but at what quality? High resolution images from zoom lenses are usually limited to lenses with 3x zoom factors. Finally, the advantage of a DSLR is you can change lenses. Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow. For a P&S, your stuck with the lens and only that lens. To upgrade requires a whole new camera. The main advantage of a P&S is size, weight, and convenience, but it comes with a sacrifice in quality, flexibility, and versatility. I have both, and use what works best for the situation. Roger I'm waiting to hear back from the OP, whether $1400 for the same basic capability in a DSLR is worth it over the $450 for the P&S. Remember this was for photographs for a "school newsletter" where I guess the camera might be handed out to school children from time-to-time. I agree with "Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow." but my interpretation of that would be to get the P&S today, and the DLSR tomorrow. Cheers, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Neat Items for a Camera Bag... | Thom Tapp | Digital Photography | 3 | September 7th 04 06:28 PM |
Another nail in the view camera coffin? | Robert Feinman | Large Format Photography Equipment | 108 | August 4th 04 03:37 PM |
Batteries for Kodak DX3600 Camera Dock | Larry R Harrison Jr | Digital Photography | 10 | July 24th 04 05:49 PM |
What's your digital camera history? | David Dyer-Bennet | Digital Photography | 67 | July 3rd 04 10:56 AM |