A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which camera to get?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 28th 04, 08:44 PM
GT40
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:18:55 GMT, "David J Taylor"
wrote:

GT40 wrote:
[]
Btw, the lens isn't a 2.8 at the 12:1 range its a 4.6.


No, it's f/2.8

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0407/04...asonicfz20.asp


Ok, I was looking at the wromg camera before.


Unless you get a 1D series the Canon DSLR's aren't bulky at all.


Compare an SLR with a 420mm f/2.8 IS lens (i.e. 280mm f/2.8 lens to
provide the same coverage). There is /considerable/ bulk difference.

I think you missed the point, just becuase its cheaper doesn't make it
better.


I don't doubt that an expensive DLSR can take better pictures. Just
because it's a DLSR doesn't make it any more suitable.


It does in this case, not all cases.
  #22  
Old September 29th 04, 03:32 AM
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

GT40 wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:18:55 GMT, "David J Taylor"
wrote:


GT40 wrote:
[]

Btw, the lens isn't a 2.8 at the 12:1 range its a 4.6.


No, it's f/2.8

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0407/04...asonicfz20.asp



Ok, I was looking at the wromg camera before.


Unless you get a 1D series the Canon DSLR's aren't bulky at all.


Compare an SLR with a 420mm f/2.8 IS lens (i.e. 280mm f/2.8 lens to
provide the same coverage). There is /considerable/ bulk difference.


I think you missed the point, just becuase its cheaper doesn't make it
better.


I don't doubt that an expensive DLSR can take better pictures. Just
because it's a DLSR doesn't make it any more suitable.



It does in this case, not all cases.


I agree with GT40.
Also, what is the shutter lag for the 2 cameras? DSLRs have always
been faster. 12x optical zoom, but at what quality? High resolution
images from zoom lenses are usually limited to lenses with 3x
zoom factors. Finally, the advantage of a DSLR is you can change lenses.
Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow. For a
P&S, your stuck with the lens and only that lens. To upgrade
requires a whole new camera. The main advantage of a P&S is size,
weight, and convenience, but it comes with a sacrifice in quality,
flexibility, and versatility.

I have both, and use what works best for the situation.

Roger

  #23  
Old September 29th 04, 09:12 AM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) wrote:
[]
I agree with GT40.
Also, what is the shutter lag for the 2 cameras? DSLRs have always
been faster. 12x optical zoom, but at what quality? High resolution
images from zoom lenses are usually limited to lenses with 3x
zoom factors. Finally, the advantage of a DSLR is you can change
lenses. Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow. For a
P&S, your stuck with the lens and only that lens. To upgrade
requires a whole new camera. The main advantage of a P&S is size,
weight, and convenience, but it comes with a sacrifice in quality,
flexibility, and versatility.

I have both, and use what works best for the situation.

Roger


I'm waiting to hear back from the OP, whether $1400 for the same basic
capability in a DSLR is worth it over the $450 for the P&S. Remember this
was for photographs for a "school newsletter" where I guess the camera
might be handed out to school children from time-to-time.

I agree with "Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow."
but my interpretation of that would be to get the P&S today, and the DLSR
tomorrow.

Cheers,
David


  #24  
Old September 29th 04, 09:12 AM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) wrote:
[]
I agree with GT40.
Also, what is the shutter lag for the 2 cameras? DSLRs have always
been faster. 12x optical zoom, but at what quality? High resolution
images from zoom lenses are usually limited to lenses with 3x
zoom factors. Finally, the advantage of a DSLR is you can change
lenses. Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow. For a
P&S, your stuck with the lens and only that lens. To upgrade
requires a whole new camera. The main advantage of a P&S is size,
weight, and convenience, but it comes with a sacrifice in quality,
flexibility, and versatility.

I have both, and use what works best for the situation.

Roger


I'm waiting to hear back from the OP, whether $1400 for the same basic
capability in a DSLR is worth it over the $450 for the P&S. Remember this
was for photographs for a "school newsletter" where I guess the camera
might be handed out to school children from time-to-time.

I agree with "Buy what you can afford today, upgrade to better tomorrow."
but my interpretation of that would be to get the P&S today, and the DLSR
tomorrow.

Cheers,
David


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neat Items for a Camera Bag... Thom Tapp Digital Photography 3 September 7th 04 06:28 PM
Another nail in the view camera coffin? Robert Feinman Large Format Photography Equipment 108 August 4th 04 03:37 PM
Batteries for Kodak DX3600 Camera Dock Larry R Harrison Jr Digital Photography 10 July 24th 04 05:49 PM
What's your digital camera history? David Dyer-Bennet Digital Photography 67 July 3rd 04 10:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.