If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digital SLRs and fungus contamination?
Hello!
I am considering to buy a Nikon D70, but will be moving to a very hot and humid place in the near future, then came the doubt about how DSLRs deal with fungus and mildew contamination. On film cameras all optical surfaces are reasonably resistant to cleaning, but I wonder how CCDs react to wiping? Or perhaps there are special procedures for CCD cleaning? I would really apreciate any thoughts on this, and I believe this info would be helpful to other people living in tropical/sub-tropical countries... Thanks, Mario. PS.: Regarding preventative measures such as silica gel, they were not enough to prevent contamination. I used to live in very humid places and despite all care had to run all my gear to a thorough cleaning at least every two years! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mario Guimaraes wrote:
Hello! I am considering to buy a Nikon D70, but will be moving to a very hot and humid place in the near future, then came the doubt about how DSLRs deal with fungus and mildew contamination. On film cameras all optical surfaces are reasonably resistant to cleaning, but I wonder how CCDs react to wiping? Or perhaps there are special procedures for CCD cleaning? I would really apreciate any thoughts on this, and I believe this info would be helpful to other people living in tropical/sub-tropical countries... Thanks, Mario. PS.: Regarding preventative measures such as silica gel, they were not enough to prevent contamination. I used to live in very humid places and despite all care had to run all my gear to a thorough cleaning at least every two years! During my forays in more tropical climates, I imagine DSLRs will have the same problem as FSLRs - frequent cleaning. Canned air helps dislodge loose materials (spores), but not all. Also, I would NEVER consider wiping across a sensor, especially for the purpose of removing surface contamination. Not exactly the same thing, but there's one location in S. Costa Rica with a PC on a generator. PC replacements are an annual affair due to mold taking root on all the internal components. In the early days, floppy disks had a MTBF of six months. A lot of this was likely due to the internal heat, and a DSLR won't suffer *that* much. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' "If one dives and returns to the surface inarticulate with amazement and with a deep realisation of the marvel of what he has seen and where he has been, then he deserves to go again and again. If he is unmoved or dissappointed, then there remains for him on earth only a longer or shorter period of waiting for death." --William Beebe, "Half Mile Down" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mario Guimaraes wrote:
Hello! I am considering to buy a Nikon D70, but will be moving to a very hot and humid place in the near future, then came the doubt about how DSLRs deal with fungus and mildew contamination. On film cameras all optical surfaces are reasonably resistant to cleaning, but I wonder how CCDs react to wiping? Or perhaps there are special procedures for CCD cleaning? I would really apreciate any thoughts on this, and I believe this info would be helpful to other people living in tropical/sub-tropical countries... Thanks, Mario. PS.: Regarding preventative measures such as silica gel, they were not enough to prevent contamination. I used to live in very humid places and despite all care had to run all my gear to a thorough cleaning at least every two years! During my forays in more tropical climates, I imagine DSLRs will have the same problem as FSLRs - frequent cleaning. Canned air helps dislodge loose materials (spores), but not all. Also, I would NEVER consider wiping across a sensor, especially for the purpose of removing surface contamination. Not exactly the same thing, but there's one location in S. Costa Rica with a PC on a generator. PC replacements are an annual affair due to mold taking root on all the internal components. In the early days, floppy disks had a MTBF of six months. A lot of this was likely due to the internal heat, and a DSLR won't suffer *that* much. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' "If one dives and returns to the surface inarticulate with amazement and with a deep realisation of the marvel of what he has seen and where he has been, then he deserves to go again and again. If he is unmoved or dissappointed, then there remains for him on earth only a longer or shorter period of waiting for death." --William Beebe, "Half Mile Down" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Jer" wrote in message ... During my forays in more tropical climates, I imagine DSLRs will have the same problem as FSLRs - frequent cleaning. Canned air helps dislodge loose materials (spores), but not all. Also, I would NEVER consider wiping across a sensor, especially for the purpose of removing surface contamination. Sensor cleaning is a fact of life of owning a dSLR. It is easily accomplished using methyl alcohol (Eclipse) and lint-free pads (Pec-Pads) Look at http://tinyurl.com/62sbt . There's a nice step-by-step illustration of sensor cleaning of a dSLR at http://www.pbase.com/image/15473243 . Canned air OTOH is an extremely BAD idea for dSLRs since the propellent (usually liquid freon or something similar) will definitely not do your sensor any good. Best way to initially address the sensor in a dSLR that shows "dust-bunnies" in its images (usually sky) is a hand blower such as the Giotto Rocket (no-brush-blowers!) HMc |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Howard McCollister wrote:
"Jer" wrote in message ... During my forays in more tropical climates, I imagine DSLRs will have the same problem as FSLRs - frequent cleaning. Canned air helps dislodge loose materials (spores), but not all. Also, I would NEVER consider wiping across a sensor, especially for the purpose of removing surface contamination. Sensor cleaning is a fact of life of owning a dSLR. It is easily accomplished using methyl alcohol (Eclipse) and lint-free pads (Pec-Pads) Look at http://tinyurl.com/62sbt . There's a nice step-by-step illustration of sensor cleaning of a dSLR at http://www.pbase.com/image/15473243 . Canned air OTOH is an extremely BAD idea for dSLRs since the propellent (usually liquid freon or something similar) will definitely not do your sensor any good. Best way to initially address the sensor in a dSLR that shows "dust-bunnies" in its images (usually sky) is a hand blower such as the Giotto Rocket (no-brush-blowers!) HMc I love it when I leave smarter than when I arrived. Thanks. I suppose Mario and I will eventually learn if this info keeps the spores out. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks a lot for the info!
Cheers, Mario. Jer wrote in : Howard McCollister wrote: "Jer" wrote in message ... During my forays in more tropical climates, I imagine DSLRs will have the same problem as FSLRs - frequent cleaning. Canned air helps dislodge loose materials (spores), but not all. Also, I would NEVER consider wiping across a sensor, especially for the purpose of removing surface contamination. Sensor cleaning is a fact of life of owning a dSLR. It is easily accomplished using methyl alcohol (Eclipse) and lint-free pads (Pec-Pads) Look at http://tinyurl.com/62sbt . There's a nice step-by-step illustration of sensor cleaning of a dSLR at http://www.pbase.com/image/15473243 . Canned air OTOH is an extremely BAD idea for dSLRs since the propellent (usually liquid freon or something similar) will definitely not do your sensor any good. Best way to initially address the sensor in a dSLR that shows "dust-bunnies" in its images (usually sky) is a hand blower such as the Giotto Rocket (no-brush-blowers!) HMc I love it when I leave smarter than when I arrived. Thanks. I suppose Mario and I will eventually learn if this info keeps the spores out. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mario Guimaraes" wrote in message
43.38... Hello! I am considering to buy a Nikon D70, but will be moving to a very hot and humid place in the near future, then came the doubt about how DSLRs deal with fungus and mildew contamination. On film cameras all optical surfaces are reasonably resistant to cleaning, but I wonder how CCDs react to wiping? Or perhaps there are special procedures for CCD cleaning? I would really apreciate any thoughts on this, and I believe this info would be helpful to other people living in tropical/sub-tropical countries... Thanks, Mario. PS.: Regarding preventative measures such as silica gel, they were not enough to prevent contamination. I used to live in very humid places and despite all care had to run all my gear to a thorough cleaning at least every two years! Mario, I live in a hot and humid place called Florida. Of course the camera spends most of its time in air conditioned quarters, while I go out and beat the bushes for pesos. I haven't had any problems yet, but I did notice that the Canon D20 has an operating limit of 85% relative humidity per the following link: http://www.adorama.com/ICA20DK1.html I haven't seen that limit on the Nikon D70 but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Clyde Torres "Hmm, beating the bushes for pesos sounds like Halliburton" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Mario Guimaraes wrote:
PS.: Regarding preventative measures such as silica gel, they were not enough to prevent contamination. I used to live in very humid places and despite all care had to run all my gear to a thorough cleaning at least every two years! I was disturbed to see one of my old zooms developed a fungus between some of the internal elements; just a big of fogging you could only see in direct light. Silica gel won't prevent everything, but I'd sure keep any new stuff as cool and dry as possible.. -- Ken Tough |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Jer" wrote in message ... Howard McCollister wrote: Sensor cleaning is a fact of life of owning a dSLR. It is easily accomplished using methyl alcohol (Eclipse) and lint-free pads (Pec-Pads) Look at http://tinyurl.com/62sbt . There's a nice step-by-step illustration of sensor cleaning of a dSLR at http://www.pbase.com/image/15473243 . Canned air OTOH is an extremely BAD idea for dSLRs since the propellent (usually liquid freon or something similar) will definitely not do your sensor any good. Best way to initially address the sensor in a dSLR that shows "dust-bunnies" in its images (usually sky) is a hand blower such as the Giotto Rocket (no-brush-blowers!) HMc I love it when I leave smarter than when I arrived. Thanks. I suppose Mario and I will eventually learn if this info keeps the spores out. Humid environments are a problem more for lenses than for cameras. Fungus growth in lenses in not uncommon and will ruin a lens. Having spent a fair amount of time in Dominican Republic and Haiti over the years http://www.pbase.com/hmac/haiti__february_2004 , my approach has been to store camera and lenses in an airtight Pelican case with a few bags of silica gel. During the day, I carry the stuff in a LowePro Computrekker, then at the end of the day, I blow out the camera with a Giotto Rocket and seal the stuff back up in the Pelican. Works for me. HMc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|