A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pyro Staining B&W negatives vs. C-41 Monochromatic film



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 15th 04, 01:27 PM
Jytzel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"KS" not.me@com wrote in message news:WifTc.97257$M95.43550@pd7tw1no...
What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC Pyro as opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is worth the trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


I´ve never tried ABC but tried PMK for a while. PMK works nicely with
most non-Tgrain films; seems to have a smooth straight curve and high
acutance when printed on VC paper. As a high acutance developer it
delivers better tonality than Rodinal or Beutler in my opinion. Grainy
and a little hard to work with.. To me the only thing I really don't
like about it is that it prints differently on graded and VC paper. I
never liked the tonality of C-41 films.
Yes it's worth playing around with.
  #12  
Old August 15th 04, 01:27 PM
Jytzel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"KS" not.me@com wrote in message news:WifTc.97257$M95.43550@pd7tw1no...
What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC Pyro as opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is worth the trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


I´ve never tried ABC but tried PMK for a while. PMK works nicely with
most non-Tgrain films; seems to have a smooth straight curve and high
acutance when printed on VC paper. As a high acutance developer it
delivers better tonality than Rodinal or Beutler in my opinion. Grainy
and a little hard to work with.. To me the only thing I really don't
like about it is that it prints differently on graded and VC paper. I
never liked the tonality of C-41 films.
Yes it's worth playing around with.
  #13  
Old August 15th 04, 02:36 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC
Pyro as opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is

worth the trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.

What are you trying to accomplish?

A really good negative with wonderful tones.


  #14  
Old August 15th 04, 02:36 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC
Pyro as opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is

worth the trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.

What are you trying to accomplish?

A really good negative with wonderful tones.


  #15  
Old August 15th 04, 02:58 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC
Pyro as opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is

worth the trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


You are really talking about apples and swimming pools here. What are
you envisioning as your final prints, Azo or an alt process contact
print, or machine enlargment prints? Can you even get C-41 B&W films
big enough for a decent contact print? If you are planning on doing
enlargments, ABC is nearly useless. Look at PMK or Pyrocat HD for
that, and you will get much "sharper" negs that you would with the
C-41 stuff.
Brook


OK let's say it's PMK. I know absolutely nothing about Pyros at this point.
Just some cursory readings at present. I've read that it's a dye or stain
which is in some ways similar to the way color film (e.g. monochromatic c41)
works. I first want to use it on 35mm, and medium format negs, then I'll try
8X10. Will I see a improvement in my negs? I want to work toward contact
printing from 8X10 or digital negs to palladium at some point in the future.


  #16  
Old August 15th 04, 02:58 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC
Pyro as opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is

worth the trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


You are really talking about apples and swimming pools here. What are
you envisioning as your final prints, Azo or an alt process contact
print, or machine enlargment prints? Can you even get C-41 B&W films
big enough for a decent contact print? If you are planning on doing
enlargments, ABC is nearly useless. Look at PMK or Pyrocat HD for
that, and you will get much "sharper" negs that you would with the
C-41 stuff.
Brook


OK let's say it's PMK. I know absolutely nothing about Pyros at this point.
Just some cursory readings at present. I've read that it's a dye or stain
which is in some ways similar to the way color film (e.g. monochromatic c41)
works. I first want to use it on 35mm, and medium format negs, then I'll try
8X10. Will I see a improvement in my negs? I want to work toward contact
printing from 8X10 or digital negs to palladium at some point in the future.


  #17  
Old August 15th 04, 02:58 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael Scarpitti" wrote in message
om...
"KS" not.me@com wrote in message

news:WifTc.97257$M95.43550@pd7tw1no...
What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC Pyro as

opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is worth the

trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


ABC is a very old formula, and I doubt you will have very good results
with modern films. Pyro is highly toxic and tricky to work with. It's
hard to control the staining, as stop baths and fixers will bleach it
out depending on various conditions.

Pyro today has very little to recommend it.


OK how about PMK?


  #18  
Old August 15th 04, 02:58 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael Scarpitti" wrote in message
om...
"KS" not.me@com wrote in message

news:WifTc.97257$M95.43550@pd7tw1no...
What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC Pyro as

opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is worth the

trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


ABC is a very old formula, and I doubt you will have very good results
with modern films. Pyro is highly toxic and tricky to work with. It's
hard to control the staining, as stop baths and fixers will bleach it
out depending on various conditions.

Pyro today has very little to recommend it.


OK how about PMK?


  #19  
Old August 15th 04, 03:36 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jytzel" wrote in message
om...
"KS" not.me@com wrote in message

news:WifTc.97257$M95.43550@pd7tw1no...
What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC Pyro as

opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is worth the

trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


I´ve never tried ABC but tried PMK for a while. PMK works nicely with
most non-Tgrain films; seems to have a smooth straight curve and high
acutance when printed on VC paper. As a high acutance developer it
delivers better tonality than Rodinal or Beutler in my opinion. Grainy
and a little hard to work with.. To me the only thing I really don't
like about it is that it prints differently on graded and VC paper. I
never liked the tonality of C-41 films.
Yes it's worth playing around with.


Thank you. You've had first hand experience. Any other tips on starting down
this road would be appreciated.


  #20  
Old August 15th 04, 03:36 PM
KS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jytzel" wrote in message
om...
"KS" not.me@com wrote in message

news:WifTc.97257$M95.43550@pd7tw1no...
What are the advantages/differences between using say ABC Pyro as

opposed to
C-41 based B&W process film? I'm debating whether it is worth the

trouble to
use play around with pyro. Thx.


I´ve never tried ABC but tried PMK for a while. PMK works nicely with
most non-Tgrain films; seems to have a smooth straight curve and high
acutance when printed on VC paper. As a high acutance developer it
delivers better tonality than Rodinal or Beutler in my opinion. Grainy
and a little hard to work with.. To me the only thing I really don't
like about it is that it prints differently on graded and VC paper. I
never liked the tonality of C-41 films.
Yes it's worth playing around with.


Thank you. You've had first hand experience. Any other tips on starting down
this road would be appreciated.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What densities at which zones? ~BitPump Large Format Photography Equipment 24 August 13th 04 04:15 AM
Kodak on Variable Film Development: NO! Michael Scarpitti In The Darkroom 276 August 12th 04 10:42 PM
Is it Copal or copal? Then what is it? Nick Zentena Large Format Photography Equipment 14 July 27th 04 03:31 AM
Insane new TSA rule for film inspection [email protected] 35mm Photo Equipment 94 June 23rd 04 05:17 AM
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... Todd Bailey Film & Labs 0 May 27th 04 08:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.