A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Neopan400 in Rodinal 1:100?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 25th 04, 07:12 AM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:33:09 GMT, A Concerned Contributer
wrote:

He won't answer you he put you in his killfile along
long time ago. Perhaps you belong there.


Perhaps ? You are truly a kind person !


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email
  #22  
Old August 25th 04, 07:24 AM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:37:15 GMT, Gregory Blank
wrote:

Personally I like Rodinal, its great for film testing because
it like Mike Scarpitti is so predictable. I am sure if he tried
it using 1+100 dilution with say 120 or 4x5 film his mind would
change....and that could be a good thing. A change of mind that is ;-)


Ya know, I still like Rodinal even though the similarities
with Scarpitti are so uncanny.

==
Rodinal is a grainy developer.
Scarpitti is very abrasive.
==
Rodinal sacrifices about 1/2 stop of film speed.
Scarpitti is not very swift either.
==
Rodinal diluted 1:100 causes adjacency in the developed image.
Scarpitti always makes a mountain out of a molehill.
==
One thing they don't have in common : character. Rodinal is to
Scarpitti as Jack Daniels is to Budweiser. One might say that Scapitti
simply doesn't know Jack.

;))


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email
  #23  
Old August 25th 04, 07:24 AM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:37:15 GMT, Gregory Blank
wrote:

Personally I like Rodinal, its great for film testing because
it like Mike Scarpitti is so predictable. I am sure if he tried
it using 1+100 dilution with say 120 or 4x5 film his mind would
change....and that could be a good thing. A change of mind that is ;-)


Ya know, I still like Rodinal even though the similarities
with Scarpitti are so uncanny.

==
Rodinal is a grainy developer.
Scarpitti is very abrasive.
==
Rodinal sacrifices about 1/2 stop of film speed.
Scarpitti is not very swift either.
==
Rodinal diluted 1:100 causes adjacency in the developed image.
Scarpitti always makes a mountain out of a molehill.
==
One thing they don't have in common : character. Rodinal is to
Scarpitti as Jack Daniels is to Budweiser. One might say that Scapitti
simply doesn't know Jack.

;))


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email
  #24  
Old August 25th 04, 11:03 AM
Robert Vervoordt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:33:09 GMT, A Concerned Contributer
wrote:

He won't answer you he put you in his killfile along
long time ago. Perhaps you belong there.

In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

John wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC), Leigh Marrin/KM6JE
wrote:

Sigh... Scarpitti is SO predictable...

That's one word. Try pathetic as well.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer -
http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email


You don't know me, or my work. Shut up and let me answer the man's question!


This last complaint by the nameless one is exactly what he was accused
of in response to his first reply to the OP.

A Concerned Contributer wrote:


Why don't you shut up and let them ask the question.

The Massive development chart says rated at 200 ISO
the time for 1+100 is 15 minutes 68F....it beats the hell
out of listening to your whining.



http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html



In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

I cannot recommend Rodinal and most fast films. Paterson Acutol is
MUCH better, and I use it on Neopan 400 all the time. Dilute 1+14,
develop for 8 minutes @ 20C/68F.

Forget Rodinal. It is an old, old product. Not recommended for modern
films at all.


It continues.

Robert Vervoordt, MFA
  #25  
Old August 25th 04, 11:03 AM
Robert Vervoordt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:33:09 GMT, A Concerned Contributer
wrote:

He won't answer you he put you in his killfile along
long time ago. Perhaps you belong there.

In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

John wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC), Leigh Marrin/KM6JE
wrote:

Sigh... Scarpitti is SO predictable...

That's one word. Try pathetic as well.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer -
http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email


You don't know me, or my work. Shut up and let me answer the man's question!


This last complaint by the nameless one is exactly what he was accused
of in response to his first reply to the OP.

A Concerned Contributer wrote:


Why don't you shut up and let them ask the question.

The Massive development chart says rated at 200 ISO
the time for 1+100 is 15 minutes 68F....it beats the hell
out of listening to your whining.



http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html



In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

I cannot recommend Rodinal and most fast films. Paterson Acutol is
MUCH better, and I use it on Neopan 400 all the time. Dilute 1+14,
develop for 8 minutes @ 20C/68F.

Forget Rodinal. It is an old, old product. Not recommended for modern
films at all.


It continues.

Robert Vervoordt, MFA
  #28  
Old August 25th 04, 11:24 AM
Robert Vervoordt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 01:24:16 -0500, John
wrote:

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:37:15 GMT, Gregory Blank
wrote:

Personally I like Rodinal, its great for film testing because
it like Mike Scarpitti is so predictable. I am sure if he tried
it using 1+100 dilution with say 120 or 4x5 film his mind would
change....and that could be a good thing. A change of mind that is ;-)


Ya know, I still like Rodinal even though the similarities
with Scarpitti are so uncanny.

==
Rodinal is a grainy developer.
Scarpitti is very abrasive.
==
Rodinal sacrifices about 1/2 stop of film speed.
Scarpitti is not very swift either.
==
Rodinal diluted 1:100 causes adjacency in the developed image.
Scarpitti always makes a mountain out of a molehill.
==
One thing they don't have in common : character. Rodinal is to
Scarpitti as Jack Daniels is to Budweiser. One might say that Scapitti
simply doesn't know Jack.

;))


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email



Hmm, so are you suggesting that both would be improved by further
dilution?

I could well enjoy less of the nameless one around here.

Maybe just getting them to consume more Sulfite will smooth the edges.

Naah. The nameless one is exactly like Rodinal, so, in his own
description, is useless for modern film.

Don't listen to him, Newbies!

Robert Vervoordt, MFA
  #29  
Old August 25th 04, 11:24 AM
Robert Vervoordt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 01:24:16 -0500, John
wrote:

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:37:15 GMT, Gregory Blank
wrote:

Personally I like Rodinal, its great for film testing because
it like Mike Scarpitti is so predictable. I am sure if he tried
it using 1+100 dilution with say 120 or 4x5 film his mind would
change....and that could be a good thing. A change of mind that is ;-)


Ya know, I still like Rodinal even though the similarities
with Scarpitti are so uncanny.

==
Rodinal is a grainy developer.
Scarpitti is very abrasive.
==
Rodinal sacrifices about 1/2 stop of film speed.
Scarpitti is not very swift either.
==
Rodinal diluted 1:100 causes adjacency in the developed image.
Scarpitti always makes a mountain out of a molehill.
==
One thing they don't have in common : character. Rodinal is to
Scarpitti as Jack Daniels is to Budweiser. One might say that Scapitti
simply doesn't know Jack.

;))


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email



Hmm, so are you suggesting that both would be improved by further
dilution?

I could well enjoy less of the nameless one around here.

Maybe just getting them to consume more Sulfite will smooth the edges.

Naah. The nameless one is exactly like Rodinal, so, in his own
description, is useless for modern film.

Don't listen to him, Newbies!

Robert Vervoordt, MFA
  #30  
Old August 25th 04, 01:13 PM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am gonna print this and put it on my wall.


In article ,
John wrote:

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:37:15 GMT, Gregory Blank
wrote:

Personally I like Rodinal, its great for film testing because
it like Mike Scarpitti is so predictable. I am sure if he tried
it using 1+100 dilution with say 120 or 4x5 film his mind would
change....and that could be a good thing. A change of mind that is ;-)


Ya know, I still like Rodinal even though the similarities
with Scarpitti are so uncanny.

==
Rodinal is a grainy developer.
Scarpitti is very abrasive.
==
Rodinal sacrifices about 1/2 stop of film speed.
Scarpitti is not very swift either.
==
Rodinal diluted 1:100 causes adjacency in the developed image.
Scarpitti always makes a mountain out of a molehill.
==
One thing they don't have in common : character. Rodinal is to
Scarpitti as Jack Daniels is to Budweiser. One might say that Scapitti
simply doesn't know Jack.

;))


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email


--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rodinal help for new user DG In The Darkroom 8 May 26th 04 11:26 AM
Rodinal Hektor Gonzal In The Darkroom 67 April 7th 04 03:32 PM
Rodinal Alparslan In The Darkroom 14 April 3rd 04 10:23 PM
Rodinal - studional piterengel In The Darkroom 1 March 19th 04 10:05 AM
Suggested development times for 400TX in Rodinal? jjs In The Darkroom 0 January 24th 04 02:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.