More on the Mirrorless Battles

https://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/who-wins-the-mirrorless.html

--
Regards,
Savageduck

Linear approximations are fine, but exponentials are more realistic.

Does anyone have the specific numbers for the two graphics ?

Be happy to work the numbers and give the annual growths and declines.

For any who might be curious, I ran an exponential analysis, and for :

DSLR, it's an annual decrease of 11.87 % and will be
4,330,000 in 2023

Mirrorless, it's an annual increase of 3.027 % and will be
4,351,300 in 2023

Looks to be about equal by 2023.

Use any of this at your own risk.

In article ,
wrote:

For any who might be curious, I ran an exponential analysis, and for :

DSLR, it's an annual decrease of 11.87 % and will be
4,330,000 in 2023

Mirrorless, it's an annual increase of 3.027 % and will be
4,351,300 in 2023

decrease and increase of what?

if you mean users, both are round off errors to smartphone cameras.

Looks to be about equal by 2023.

Use any of this at your own risk.

better yet, ignore it.

decrease and increase of what?

Just read the first post starting this thread, dumbass.

better yet, ignore it.

Refuge of someone who's lost an argument.

In article ,
wrote:


decrease and increase of what?

Just read the first post starting this thread, dumbass.

quote it in your post for context.

better yet, ignore it.

Refuge of someone who's lost an argument.

nope.

quote it in your post for context.

OK, with all due respect, here it is since it's apparently needed.

The initial post related to the DSLR / Mirrorless issue,
and referenced the following site :

https://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews...irrorless.html

Here there was an article, which presented among other things, an
informative graphic related to DSLR and Mirrorless usage, in some
scale from 4 to 16 million, over a 5 year period. In addition to
yearly data points, linear expressions were presented.

I expressed, that an exponential fit to the points was prefferable to
a linear fit, and presented the exponential fits, which I computed
from the graphic.

On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 14:18:01 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:


decrease and increase of what?

Just read the first post starting this thread, dumbass.

quote it in your post for context.

THis from the guy who routinely deletes text when replying to posts
and justifies it by saying that if you want to know what was
previously there you should look up the thread.

better yet, ignore it.

Refuge of someone who's lost an argument.

nope.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens