If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
What exactly happens when a camera is set to macro mode?
And why are some lenses "macro lenses" while others are not? Can a lens which is not a macro lens take close-ups? -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
Alfred Molon wrote:
What exactly happens when a camera is set to macro mode? And why are some lenses "macro lenses" while others are not? Can a lens which is not a macro lens take close-ups? It really just puts more distance between the lens elements and the sensor, decreasing both minimum focusing distance and total light entering the sensor. It will often design some compromise in the overall lens design. The best way to do this is to buy extension tubes. You can get miniscule focusing distances (some lenses work better than others with them), but you lose the ability to focus to infinity while they're mounted. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
Alfred Molon wrote:
What exactly happens when a camera is set to macro mode? And why are some lenses "macro lenses" while others are not? Can a lens which is not a macro lens take close-ups? Which camera? Usually macro lenses have better performance than "standard" lenses in the 1:1 reproduction region as they are designed to work at that ratio, whereas standard lenses are designed for typical "near infinity" subject distances. Another example: field flatness may be better in a macro lens. David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
In article , David J
Taylor says... Which camera? Usually macro lenses have better performance than "standard" lenses in the 1:1 reproduction region as they are designed to work at that ratio, whereas standard lenses are designed for typical "near infinity" subject distances. Another example: field flatness may be better in a macro lens. Well, all cameras I've used so far had a macro mode and to be fair even the Sony A350 has one. But the CZ 16-80 lens for instance is not marked as macro, while instead the Tamron 70-300 has a macro mode available between 180 and 300mm focal length. I'm wondering what on earth this macro mode means and why it's only available between 180mm and 300mm. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
Alfred Molon wrote:
[] Well, all cameras I've used so far had a macro mode and to be fair even the Sony A350 has one. But the CZ 16-80 lens for instance is not marked as macro, while instead the Tamron 70-300 has a macro mode available between 180 and 300mm focal length. I'm wondering what on earth this macro mode means and why it's only available between 180mm and 300mm. Alfred, I think that there are several different things he - cameras with a "macro mode" usually mean: (a) the focus range is extended to include nearer objects than normal and perhaps (b) a slower focus speed is used. - The Tamron, i suspect, allows a slightly different internal arrnagement of its elements, but one which only works in the focal lens range you stated. It will allow you to focus much close than normal. - a true "macro lens" is likely to be an expensive fixed-focus lens, optimised for excellent performance in the reproduction range 1:2 (half scale) to 1:1. Cheers, David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
In article , David J
Taylor says... - The Tamron, i suspect, allows a slightly different internal arrnagement of its elements, but one which only works in the focal lens range you stated. It will allow you to focus much close than normal. I read the minimum focus distance for this lens in macro mode is around 1.20m. - a true "macro lens" is likely to be an expensive fixed-focus lens, optimised for excellent performance in the reproduction range 1:2 (half scale) to 1:1. Well, compact cameras excel at macro mode because the sensor is smaller. With a DLSR instead you have to buy an expensive dedicated lens. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , David J Taylor says... - The Tamron, i suspect, allows a slightly different internal arrnagement of its elements, but one which only works in the focal lens range you stated. It will allow you to focus much close than normal. I read the minimum focus distance for this lens in macro mode is around 1.20m. - a true "macro lens" is likely to be an expensive fixed-focus lens, optimised for excellent performance in the reproduction range 1:2 (half scale) to 1:1. Well, compact cameras excel at macro mode because the sensor is smaller. With a DLSR instead you have to buy an expensive dedicated lens. Or a $100 50/1.8 and a $169 set of Kenko extension tubes, which can then be reused on other lenses. This combo allows you to take shots like this: http://trupin.smugmug.com/gallery/82...916_4UQLG-O-LB |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , David J Taylor says... - The Tamron, i suspect, allows a slightly different internal arrnagement of its elements, but one which only works in the focal lens range you stated. It will allow you to focus much close than normal. I read the minimum focus distance for this lens in macro mode is around 1.20m. That's darn close for 300mm (450mm equivalent). - a true "macro lens" is likely to be an expensive fixed-focus lens, optimised for excellent performance in the reproduction range 1:2 (half scale) to 1:1. Well, compact cameras excel at macro mode because the sensor is smaller. They have more DOF by default but with a DSLR you can stop down with high ISO, flash and or a tripod & get better. With a DLSR instead you have to buy an expensive dedicated lens. The larger sensor does mean you need a bigger lens. As mentioned, many lanses can be used for good results with extension tubes including most telephotos, or the cheap 50mm which are quite sharp. Cameras with macro mode do the same thing (extension 'tube' built in). -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
Alfred Molon wrote:
What exactly happens when a camera is set to macro mode? It enables auto-focussing to a very close range, which is normally omitted from the autfocus range in order to speed up the focusing process for normal photos and avoid focus hunting. Depending on the camera model it may also select certain exposure parameters that the manufacturer deemed optimal for macro photography. And why are some lenses "macro lenses" Because they can focus so close that the sharp image of the object on the film/sensor plane is the same (traditional), half (DX), or ~1/4 (modern marketing speak) of the object. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_lens has a pretty good explanation. while others are not? Because they cannot be focussed to such a short distance. Can a lens which is not a macro lens take close-ups? With proper attachements: yes. Again, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_lens describes the option. jue |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Macro mode
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , David J Taylor says... - The Tamron, i suspect, allows a slightly different internal arrnagement of its elements, but one which only works in the focal lens range you stated. It will allow you to focus much close than normal. I read the minimum focus distance for this lens in macro mode is around 1.20m. Then Tamrom is honest about the magnification: below a focal length of 180mm at 1.2m you don't get the 1:1 or 1:2 magnification required to call it 'macro'. - a true "macro lens" is likely to be an expensive fixed-focus lens, optimised for excellent performance in the reproduction range 1:2 (half scale) to 1:1. Well, compact cameras excel at macro mode because the sensor is smaller. No, they don't. The marketing departments excel in redefining the meaning of 'macro'. With a DLSR instead you have to buy an expensive dedicated lens. If DSLRS suck so badly then why don't you stick with a P&S? jue |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Macro Mode | Dave Cohen | Digital Photography | 7 | August 17th 07 06:50 AM |
Panasonic DMC-LZ2 Macro Mode | isw | Digital Photography | 6 | May 28th 07 12:29 PM |
Tips on macro mode... | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 3 | November 19th 06 04:00 AM |
Macro lens or mode on P&S? | Mr.Bolshoyhuy | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | March 15th 06 08:10 PM |
Macro mode how do I use? | Bible John | Digital Point & Shoot Cameras | 10 | August 26th 05 10:22 PM |