If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Capture One 11 Pro: was - Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote
(in article ): On 10/30/2018 9:04 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote (in article ): On 10/28/2018 3:56 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 28, 2018, Bill W wrote (in ): On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:51:03 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Did you happen to notice that deal for Capture One with Fuji Cameras? I can't remember all the details, but I think you get lifetime Capture One with a one-time $200 payment. There's more to it, but I also think it's limited to working with Fuji photos. What they have is *Free* Capture One Express Fujifilm which is not fully featured, and which i have been playing with. Then there is the fully featured Capture One Pro Fujifilm $199. https://www.phaseone.com/en/Capture-One/Capture-One-Fujifilm.aspx There is also a Sony only version. So, now that 20% of the responses in this topic are yours, perhaps you could retract your original complaint? ;-) Naah! My original complaint regarding Rich’s off topic Windows posts is still valid. All the Bill W thread drift to a Capture One & Fujifilm question did was bring things on topic for r.p.d. and I responded to that. Note that in that digression there was no mention of Windows. As for my post directly in response to RichA bitching about subject change, there was no content at all. Now what do you have to say regarding Capture One & Fujifilm? All topics have drift if they're long enough, and it's a safe bet that much of the content will have little to do with the primary focus of the newsgroup. While I don't think Rich's perspective toward Windows is either accurate or useful, his comment was aimed at storage, which is relevant to any newsgroup dedicated to acquiring digital data of any kind. Ok! Ok! However, his posts are frequently an OT royal PIA which leave me wondering what his goal, or intent for posting to r.p.d.other than actively engaging *nospam* might be. As I don't have a Fujifilm camera, apps dedicated to them have little interest to me, but I don't have a problem with those who find it useful information, even if it hijacked the topic. ;-) Since Capture One Pro is also available as a more general program rather than their two manufacturer specific versions (Sony, or Fujifilm), any thoughts. https://www.phaseone.com/en/Capture-One.aspx -- Regards, Savageduck |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Capture One 11 Pro: was - Got to admit; when Windows fails, itdoes so spectacularly.
On 10/30/2018 1:48 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote [...] As I don't have a Fujifilm camera, apps dedicated to them have little interest to me, but I don't have a problem with those who find it useful information, even if it hijacked the topic. ;-) Since Capture One Pro is also available as a more general program rather than their two manufacturer specific versions (Sony, or Fujifilm), any thoughts. https://www.phaseone.com/en/Capture-One.aspx Well, once again my perspective toward image editing software is tied to my history of professional image editing since the 1970s. My preferred software is that which provides good tools, not "push-button" effects, and as such will not be specific to any camera or presumed workflow. Otherwise, I waste entirely too much time trying to figure out what those effects are really doing to the image. -- best regards, Neil |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Capture One 11 Pro: was - Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote
(in article ): On 10/30/2018 1:48 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote [...] As I don't have a Fujifilm camera, apps dedicated to them have little interest to me, but I don't have a problem with those who find it useful information, even if it hijacked the topic. ;-) Since Capture One Pro is also available as a more general program rather than their two manufacturer specific versions (Sony, or Fujifilm), any thoughts. https://www.phaseone.com/en/Capture-One.aspx Well, once again my perspective toward image editing software is tied to my history of professional image editing since the 1970s. My preferred software is that which provides good tools, not "push-button" effects, and as such will not be specific to any camera or presumed workflow. Just consider that your history of professional image editing is rooted in a wet darkroom, as was my hobbyist image editing history, and that today the professional, and the enthusiast hobbyist photographers have moved into the digital darkroom which entails using appropriate “good tools”, and for most photographers in those categories that means Adobe CC, or some other sophisticated software. I do not recall what you are shooting these days, but if you are shooting any digital I would have believed that you would be interested in software such as Photoshop, Lightroom, Capture One, DxO, and several others, and how they work, along with their ease of use, I am. ....and Capture One, like Photoshop is software which provides “good tools” with options to use, or create your own presets, or actions, or use auxiliary plugins. They are nothing more than the digital equivalent of a wet darkroom. There are others which do much the same, and some which cater to the lowest common denominator by providing a one stop fix for the smartphone shooters, and even those folks have some sophisticated apps with “good tools" available to them. Otherwise, I waste entirely too much time trying to figure out what those effects are really doing to the image. That will depend on the specific software, and its purpose, or what exactly you mean by “push-button effects”. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Capture One 11 Pro: was - Got to admit; when Windows fails, itdoes so spectacularly.
On 10/30/2018 4:36 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote (in article ): On 10/30/2018 1:48 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote [...] As I don't have a Fujifilm camera, apps dedicated to them have little interest to me, but I don't have a problem with those who find it useful information, even if it hijacked the topic. ;-) Since Capture One Pro is also available as a more general program rather than their two manufacturer specific versions (Sony, or Fujifilm), any thoughts. https://www.phaseone.com/en/Capture-One.aspx Well, once again my perspective toward image editing software is tied to my history of professional image editing since the 1970s. My preferred software is that which provides good tools, not "push-button" effects, and as such will not be specific to any camera or presumed workflow. Just consider that your history of professional image editing is rooted in a wet darkroom, as was my hobbyist image editing history, and that today the professional, and the enthusiast hobbyist photographers have moved into the digital darkroom which entails using appropriate “good tools”, and for most photographers in those categories that means Adobe CC, or some other sophisticated software. I do not recall what you are shooting these days, but if you are shooting any digital I would have believed that you would be interested in software such as Photoshop, Lightroom, Capture One, DxO, and several others, and how they work, along with their ease of use, I am. Duck, I began working with _digital images_ in the 1970s. My wet darkroom days go back to the '60s. The first "digital image editors" I worked with were for video production, like the Quantel Paintbox and other specialized hardware. By the late '70s, I was using custom tools for personal computers such as for the Apple][ and even designed and built some. By the 80s I was using mainly PC-based hardware and software such as the AT&T Vista, which was 32bit color. There were many image editing programs in those days, but I eventually preferred Aldus PhotoStyler because of its ability to create and save custom tools. Adobe bought Aldus, and shut down PhotoStyler to sell Photoshop, which was quite inferior to it. So, I've used Photoshop since its release and haven't seen anything since version 5 or so that brought something useful to my table. I work in the format of the output medium (e.g. CMYK for print, RGB for video), and find it much faster to use curves and other fundamental tools to do the job to my level of expectations. -- best regards, Neil |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Capture One 11 Pro: was - Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote
(in article ): On 10/30/2018 4:36 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote (in article ): On 10/30/2018 1:48 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 30, 2018, Neil wrote [...] As I don't have a Fujifilm camera, apps dedicated to them have little interest to me, but I don't have a problem with those who find it useful information, even if it hijacked the topic. ;-) Since Capture One Pro is also available as a more general program rather than their two manufacturer specific versions (Sony, or Fujifilm), any thoughts. https://www.phaseone.com/en/Capture-One.aspx Well, once again my perspective toward image editing software is tied to my history of professional image editing since the 1970s. My preferred software is that which provides good tools, not "push-button" effects, and as such will not be specific to any camera or presumed workflow. Just consider that your history of professional image editing is rooted in a wet darkroom, as was my hobbyist image editing history, and that today the professional, and the enthusiast hobbyist photographers have moved into the digital darkroom which entails using appropriate “good tools”, and for most photographers in those categories that means Adobe CC, or some other sophisticated software. I do not recall what you are shooting these days, but if you are shooting any digital I would have believed that you would be interested in software such as Photoshop, Lightroom, Capture One, DxO, and several others, and how they work, along with their ease of use, I am. Duck, I began working with _digital images_ in the 1970s. My wet darkroom days go back to the '60s. Mine started back in the ‘50s in my father’s darkroom. If you started working on digital images in the 1970s you have me there by a few years. The first "digital image editors" I worked with were for video production, like the Quantel Paintbox and other specialized hardware. I was/am not a video shooter of any kind. By the late '70s, I was using custom tools for personal computers such as for the Apple][ and even designed and built some. I got my first Apple, an Apple ][e in 1983. By the 80s I was using mainly PC-based hardware and software such as the AT&T Vista, which was 32bit color. At home for my personal use I have always used Apple computers since that first Apple ][e. However, at work it was all on PC-based machines. There were many image editing programs in those days, but I eventually preferred Aldus PhotoStyler because of its ability to create and save custom tools. Adobe bought Aldus, and shut down PhotoStyler to sell Photoshop, which was quite inferior to it. So, I've used Photoshop since its release and haven't seen anything since version 5 or so that brought something useful to my table. Do you mean Photoshop 5.0 (version 5.0), or Photoshop CS5 (version 12.0)? I work in the format of the output medium (e.g. CMYK for print, RGB for video), and find it much faster to use curves and other fundamental tools to do the job to my level of expectations. You can certainly work that way with Photoshop, as you can with similar Pro level software. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:12:01 -0700 (PDT), Whisky-dave
wrote: On Monday, 29 October 2018 23:42:45 UTC, Eric Stevens wrote: On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 06:56:55 +0000, David Taylor wrote: On 29/10/2018 04:29, Eric Stevens wrote: [] Now you tell me. I'm currently trying to make my two Windows 10 computer _each_ talk to the other. Corsair gets on fine with Dell but rejects Dell whenever Dell tries to talk back. The instructions on line sound as though they were written by those guys. Check: Share/directory/file security Network public/private Network discovery Try IP addresses rather than names Done all that. My problem is that any attempt of Dell to contact Corsair gets a response of "You are not authorised to ... " or words to that effect. I've been through all the settings that I (and others) can think of and they are identical on both machines. Yet Corsair is succesful in contacting Dell while Dell is unsuccesful in getting a useful response from Corsair. The problem may lie in the fact that Corsair is W10 Home while Dell is W10 Pro. You;re not suggesting that thgis is a Windows problem are you ? Not at all. I've boiled it down to probably being a user name and password problem. I hope to know later in the day. The problem is that Windows can do so many things (sometimes in so many different ways) that unless you know exactly what you are doing you can be brought up short by a security barrier at almost any stage. What I now have to do is make sure that he two computers are so configured that they can actually talk to each other. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: Done all that. My problem is that any attempt of Dell to contact Corsair gets a response of "You are not authorised to ... " or words to that effect. I've been through all the settings that I (and others) can think of and they are identical on both machines. Yet Corsair is succesful in contacting Dell while Dell is unsuccesful in getting a useful response from Corsair. The problem may lie in the fact that Corsair is W10 Home while Dell is W10 Pro. You;re not suggesting that thgis is a Windows problem are you ? Not at all. I've boiled it down to probably being a user name and password problem. I hope to know later in the day. The problem is that Windows can do so many things (sometimes in so many different ways) that unless you know exactly what you are doing you can be brought up short by a security barrier at almost any stage. What I now have to do is make sure that he two computers are so configured that they can actually talk to each other. it's very clearly a windows problem when it's so much trouble just to get two computers to talk to each other. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:38:25 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Done all that. My problem is that any attempt of Dell to contact Corsair gets a response of "You are not authorised to ... " or words to that effect. I've been through all the settings that I (and others) can think of and they are identical on both machines. Yet Corsair is succesful in contacting Dell while Dell is unsuccesful in getting a useful response from Corsair. The problem may lie in the fact that Corsair is W10 Home while Dell is W10 Pro. You;re not suggesting that thgis is a Windows problem are you ? Not at all. I've boiled it down to probably being a user name and password problem. I hope to know later in the day. The problem is that Windows can do so many things (sometimes in so many different ways) that unless you know exactly what you are doing you can be brought up short by a security barrier at almost any stage. What I now have to do is make sure that he two computers are so configured that they can actually talk to each other. it's very clearly a windows problem when it's so much trouble just to get two computers to talk to each other. Everything is an XXXXXX problem if you don't know the rules by which XXXXXX operates. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: Done all that. My problem is that any attempt of Dell to contact Corsair gets a response of "You are not authorised to ... " or words to that effect. I've been through all the settings that I (and others) can think of and they are identical on both machines. Yet Corsair is succesful in contacting Dell while Dell is unsuccesful in getting a useful response from Corsair. The problem may lie in the fact that Corsair is W10 Home while Dell is W10 Pro. You;re not suggesting that thgis is a Windows problem are you ? Not at all. I've boiled it down to probably being a user name and password problem. I hope to know later in the day. The problem is that Windows can do so many things (sometimes in so many different ways) that unless you know exactly what you are doing you can be brought up short by a security barrier at almost any stage. What I now have to do is make sure that he two computers are so configured that they can actually talk to each other. it's very clearly a windows problem when it's so much trouble just to get two computers to talk to each other. Everything is an XXXXXX problem if you don't know the rules by which XXXXXX operates. no. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Got to admit; when Windows fails, it does so spectacularly.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:58:21 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Done all that. My problem is that any attempt of Dell to contact Corsair gets a response of "You are not authorised to ... " or words to that effect. I've been through all the settings that I (and others) can think of and they are identical on both machines. Yet Corsair is succesful in contacting Dell while Dell is unsuccesful in getting a useful response from Corsair. The problem may lie in the fact that Corsair is W10 Home while Dell is W10 Pro. You;re not suggesting that thgis is a Windows problem are you ? Not at all. I've boiled it down to probably being a user name and password problem. I hope to know later in the day. The problem is that Windows can do so many things (sometimes in so many different ways) that unless you know exactly what you are doing you can be brought up short by a security barrier at almost any stage. What I now have to do is make sure that he two computers are so configured that they can actually talk to each other. it's very clearly a windows problem when it's so much trouble just to get two computers to talk to each other. Everything is an XXXXXX problem if you don't know the rules by which XXXXXX operates. no. It certainly works for Windows. It also works for you. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sigma, tired of LYING about resolution, admit they needed more | Gary Eickmeier | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | October 9th 10 07:38 PM |
Rita, you have to admit that Nikon can't do this! | Charles[_2_] | Digital Photography | 8 | July 22nd 08 12:37 AM |
Admit it; You'd like a Nikon FE-2 with a digital back | Rich | Digital Photography | 62 | April 3rd 06 09:36 AM |