If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on
several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage Thanks. Don |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
In article ,
Don Tuttle wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage Thanks. Don A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
In article , android
wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... usb requires a cable and a network server does not. also, a raid is not needed unless he requires constant availability which is unlikely. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
In article ,
nospam wrote: In article , android wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... usb requires a cable and a network server does not. also, a raid is not needed unless he requires constant availability which is unlikely. Jupp, he saves on the cable... The should make the deal a done one! ;-p -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
In article , android
wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... usb requires a cable and a network server does not. also, a raid is not needed unless he requires constant availability which is unlikely. Jupp, he saves on the cable... The should make the deal a done one! ;-p it's not about saving money on the cable. it's about convenience and workflow. he has a laptop, so why would he want to be tethered to a hard drive, which he'll have to plug and unplug all the time as he moves about? a network share will be available no matter where he is in his house or office, and can even be configured to be accessible from the outside world if that's desired. it will also be accessible from another computer should he get one at a later time (or maybe he already has one). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
In article ,
nospam wrote: In article , android wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... usb requires a cable and a network server does not. also, a raid is not needed unless he requires constant availability which is unlikely. Jupp, he saves on the cable... The should make the deal a done one! ;-p it's not about saving money on the cable. it's about convenience and workflow. ;-PPPPP he has a laptop, so why would he want to be tethered to a hard drive, which he'll have to plug and unplug all the time as he moves about? Faster file access. He might wanna work them files, you know... a network share will be available no matter where he is in his house or office, and can even be configured to be accessible from the outside world if that's desired. True. It might be a steeper learning curve to configure a NAS that way though... it will also be accessible from another computer should he get one at a later time (or maybe he already has one). He asked about access from his Mac. If he wants to work from a Linux box or something too: Then you're right, off course! -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
On 2014-08-12 14:36:11 +0000, android said:
In article , Don Tuttle wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage Thanks. Don A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... Agreed, a RAID would probably be best If not USB3 then consider FW800 or Thunderbolt. I usually got to OWC for my drives and stuff Mac, they have quite a few options. http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/ http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Thunderbolt/ -- Regards, Savageduck |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
In article 2014081208291514061-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage Thanks. Don A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... Agreed, a RAID would probably be best If not USB3 then consider FW800 or Thunderbolt. I usually got to OWC for my drives and stuff Mac, they have quite a few options. raid is not needed unless he needs high availability, which he more than likely does not. if he doesn't, then a normal network share + good backup strategy is *much* better and less expensive. raid is not a backup. his question is also not mac specific. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
On 2014-08-12 15:32:22 +0000, nospam said:
In article 2014081208291514061-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage Thanks. Don A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... Agreed, a RAID would probably be best If not USB3 then consider FW800 or Thunderbolt. I usually got to OWC for my drives and stuff Mac, they have quite a few options. raid is not needed unless he needs high availability, which he more than likely does not. if he doesn't, then a normal network share + good backup strategy is *much* better and less expensive. raid is not a backup. his question is also not mac specific. What part of "I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro" isn't Mac specific? It sounds to me that he is looking to consolidate the 4TB of image files from the several external HDs he is currently using, and a good RAID with some redundancy can provide that storage with easy retrieval. He didn't ask anything about back up, that is a different question. That said having the RAID as part of a network server is also a viable possibility. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Best storage/retrieval system for images & MacBookPro
In article 2014081208474139936-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro. Images are at present on several external HD. What is best way to store images for ready retrieval? Anything more efficient/suitable than "network attached storage" (NAS) like the units sold by Buffalo? http://www.buffalotech.com/products/network-storage A external USB RAID should be faster.I would have asked this in comp.sys.mac.system... Agreed, a RAID would probably be best If not USB3 then consider FW800 or Thunderbolt. I usually got to OWC for my drives and stuff Mac, they have quite a few options. raid is not needed unless he needs high availability, which he more than likely does not. if he doesn't, then a normal network share + good backup strategy is *much* better and less expensive. raid is not a backup. his question is also not mac specific. What part of "I have 4TB of images and a 1TB MacBookPro" isn't Mac specific? the original poster may have a mac, but the answer is not mac specific. the answer would be the same for someone with a 1 tb windows laptop (other than afp being highly desired). It sounds to me that he is looking to consolidate the 4TB of image files from the several external HDs he is currently using, and a good RAID with some redundancy can provide that storage with easy retrieval. He didn't ask anything about back up, that is a different question. That said having the RAID as part of a network server is also a viable possibility. raid is high availability and most people don't need that. raid is not a backup. he didn't ask about a backup but he absolutely needs to consider that because if the server fails and there is no backup, the images are lost. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mass-storage appliance for saving camera images? | Bert Hyman | Digital Photography | 22 | April 21st 07 11:14 PM |
Storage & retrieval of movie still photos? | Maria | Digital Photography | 7 | December 24th 06 04:02 PM |
Logiciel de CBIR (content based usage retrieval) | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 10th 05 02:29 PM |
Physical storage of images | dperez@juno_nospam.com | Digital Photography | 36 | November 11th 04 06:40 PM |
Weird order of retrieval from Finepix S5000 | Trentus | Digital Photography | 9 | August 3rd 04 12:44 PM |