On Sun, 04 Nov 2018 09:16:17 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


I have been forced to replace all my older stuff
after about five years simply because they were too small. I expect
that would be the case with any NAS I had bought say 10 years ago: it
would have proved too small.

you're confusing drive capacity with hardware limitations.

Its the reason why I replaced them.

then why did you bring up hardware limitations such as 100mbit ethernet?

Alan Browne could merely add a few
more CDs, for certain values of few.

he replaced them because of degradation, a lengthy manual process.

a nas can hold tens of thousands of dvds and automatically expand as
needed.

You mean without human intervention? Ever?
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens