Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
"Noons" wrote in message
...
Alan Browne wrote,on my timestamp of 28/02/2010 7:10 AM:

It's because you are applying the wrong definition that most people
won't agree with this.
At some point somebody used the term analog for film and it caught on
like wildfire. That doesn't make it "right".
You watch: next he's gonna tell us that film grain is the same as
pixels...
.
Well, yes. Of course. Those little itsy bitsy bits of silver halide are
either fully developed or totally undeveloped. Not a single, solitary one
in any kind of between or betwixt state. A binary based imagery system film
is, it clearly not being an analog imagery system according to him.

hmmm...film is not digital? Well, what is the antonym - the opposite - of
digital? You know - if something is not digital, then it is..... Well,
son of a gun!!!

Antonyms of "digital":



But he explained he is an engineer. So that being said, everyone else is
wrong :-)

Stephanie