On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 17:34:47 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:


quote it in your post for context.

OK, with all due respect, here it is since it's apparently needed.

The initial post related to the DSLR / Mirrorless issue,
and referenced the following site :

https://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews...irrorless.html

Here there was an article, which presented among other things, an
informative graphic related to DSLR and Mirrorless usage, in some
scale from 4 to 16 million, over a 5 year period. In addition to
yearly data points, linear expressions were presented.

I expressed, that an exponential fit to the points was prefferable to
a linear fit, and presented the exponential fits, which I computed
from the graphic.

fit it however you want. it's still a roundoff error compared to
smartphones.

Swift protective change of subject.

be sure to display the image at its full resolution, not scaled to the
browser window:
https://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2017/03/cameraproductionchart.jpg

full article:
https://petapixel.com/2017/03/03/lat...t-reveals-deat
h-compact-camera/
³In a nutshell, photography is more popular than it has ever been Â*
take a look at the rise of Instagram or Snapchat, for example,²
Skafisk tells PetaPixel. ³But literally 98.4% of the consumer cameras
sold in 2016 were built into smartphones Â* only 0.8% were compacts,
0.5% DSLRs, and 0.2% mirrorless.²

slrs and mirrorless *combined* are *under* 1% of cameras sold.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens