If you could have any kind of camera (even non-existant ones) what would you choose?
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:39:54 -0400, nospam
wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:
Because it still works.
so do modern cameras.
there is *nothing* that a 50 year old relic can do that a modern camera
cannot do better, more accurately and more reliably and with *much*
better results.
I know what Ken Hart means. For some purposes the all singing-dancing
modern camera can get between the photographer and the taking of the
picture.
nonsense.
You can of course ignore the dance band.
--
Regards,
Eric Stevens
|