"RichA" wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, 4 August 2015 16:58:36 UTC-4, Me wrote:
On 04/08/2015 17:06, RichA wrote:
$1400? How? If it turns out to be good, it'll be the biggest
bargain they've offered.

Rumour is Tamron might have built it. I sure hope not. If they
release a 24mp D400 and this lens, it would be a wildlife shooter's
dream. Compact and powerful.

Fantastic and about time.
Isn't the Nikkor 10-24 DX lens made by Tamron?
Perhaps Tamron (& Sigma) proved another point - that optically very
good
long "consumer" zooms can be made at a much lower price point than
anybody expected.

I can't say it's good, because I've never used a Tamron or Sigma
long-range zoom.

Really! I've never used a D810 but I know it's a darn good camera. You
don't necessarily have to use something to know how good it is or isn't.
As someone who likes to quote dpreview at times, do a little reading in
the forums there and see how the vast majority of users are happy with
their Sigma and Tamron 150-600mm lenses. You can read some reviews too.


Nikon were really pushing it with their 80-400 AFS - with pro-level
pricing for something quite ordinary.

It was ridiculous. Most people made the point you just did.

I'd be surprised if the 200-500
is any worse in build quality, weather sealing etc.
It's a great time for Nikon DSLR owners.

No weather sealing, but the thing doesn't look like a 70-300mm either.