On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:12:41 +0200, android wrote:

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

In article , android wrote:

In article ,

Sandman:
Sandman Who's the winner? 09/17/2014


"Uh, the D7100 beats the 7D in most areas. The 7D has slightly
better ISO performance and shoots at 10fps compared to 6fps
for the D7100, other than that, it's utterly trounced."

---

android:
That's what action photogs want. I'd say that's it not the 7D2
thats humiliated. It's the poster that confuses it with a five
year old camera.

Sandman:
When did you confuse it with a five year old camera? Either way,
you're humiliated, I agree.

You can't read your own writing then...

I can, when did you confuse it for a five year old camera?

You can take him now...

There are pretty good reviews and discussions on the 7D2 all over the
web and on-line forums that give good information on the new camera,
minus all the invective and pointless arguing that we have here.

So if it's INFO you want, go to those places. If you want to argue
about everything EXCEPT the 7D2, you have found your ideal place here
in the newsgroup.

The only people who inhabit these newsgroups are those who like to
insult and challenge, and who enjoy being abused in that way.

Sandman, how would you compare the 7D to the 7D?

W