In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

android:
That's what action photogs want. I'd say that's it
not the 7D2 thats humiliated. It's the poster that confuses
it with a five year old camera.

Sandman:
When did you confuse it with a five year old camera?
Either way, you're humiliated, I agree.

Whisky-dave:
What I'd like to know (sandman) yet again is what camera you're
actully talking about the old canon 7D or the NEW canon 7D2 it's
not clear.

Sandman:
The topic is the new version of the 7D, which is all I've been
talking about, naturally.

So the sentance "Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the
D7100,"

tells us that does it.

No, all the information I posted that only apply to the second version of
the 7D does, plus my clarification that I quoted. Easy for someone fluent
in English to understand.

Sandman:
Like I said yesterday:

So from now on every time you type 7D we are to substitute 7D mark
II

Why would you do that? When was the last time I talked about the 7D?

It's not that difficult to get such things right is it ? I suppose
in your world when you talk about eh canon 5D you are actually
refering to the 5D mk II or do you mean the 5D mk III ?

I would be in reference to the latest version of it, just as I would if I
was talking about the Nikon D4.

Sandman:
"Uh, the D7100 beats the 7D in most areas."

Whisky-dave:
Which 7D are you talking about

Sandman:
The one the thread is about.

and how is that worked out then...... from wht you type or what;s
rattling around in your head

No, what the thread is about. You can read it yourself, it's written with
text in English.

Android: "Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400..."
Me: "Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100"

Drunk Dave: "Eh, why is he talking about a different camera? I don't
understand!"

--
Sandman[.net]