In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

I'm not saying that my version is better or the best. I'm just saying
that mine is what I want to show. We either go for stark realism and
leave the warts or we remove the warts and try to focus the viewers
attention. It's not good to create new warts.

Sorry I disagree. Some viewers like the warts.

perhaps you can answer your own question:

In article , PeterN
wrote:
Please explain in detail the factual basis for your conclusion.


WTF are you blabbering about.

He only enters a thread to create dissension. Never to link to a
photograph he's taken or to critique one. I don't know why he bothers
to read a photo newsgroup.

I don't think that you are quite correct. nospam is very knowledgable
about some subjects and does have something to contribute to the news
group.

But when has he ever contributed a photo or a critique or comment
about a photo?

When has he ever entered a thread about a subject where he wasn't
entering to argue with someone about something?

many times.

you're too bent on bashing that you can't see it, or are intentionally
ignoring it so that you can bash.