On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:46:32 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On Apr 24, 2018, Eric Stevens wrote
(in ):

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 19:51:35 -0400,
wrote:

In , Eric Stevens
wrote:

the corrections can be done *outside* of the camera, where you can
guess all you want and undo it whenever you make an incorrect guess,
or, let the computer do the calculations *for* you, eliminating the
need to guess.

Have another look at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dku87csvth...00941.jpg?dl=0

That's the result of technology applied to
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hgfbskbe4c...941-2.jpg?dl=0

that's the result of not doing it correctly.

There were constraints around me that limited what I could do. I hoped
that I would get enough image to be useful but I was wrong. If I had a
camera with all the necessary movements I would have known that it was
a lost cause before I took the picture.

it wouldn't have been a lost cause had you known how to work within
those constraints.

What would you have done?

Buy a Fujifilm GFX 50S and the Cambo Actus-GFX View Camera system:

https://www.cambo.com/en/actus-series/actus-gfx-view-camera/

Very nice - but $$$$$$

https://blog.cambo.com/2017/12/20/cambo-actus-gfx-and-fuji-gfx50s-camera-review/

I believe they also have systems for the X-T2 and Canon & Nikon DSLRs.

I think I would like a little more tilt and swing than that camera
offers.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens