"Skip M" wrote in message
news:gkNdf.51$K26.12@fed1read02...


wrote in message
...
In message ,
John A. Stovall wrote:

Simple solution don't buy EF-S lenses and plan to go to a 5D on 1D
body.

But what do you substitute the 10-22 EF-S or 17-85 IS EF-S with?

The 10-22 with a 1.6x crop is better in the corners than the 16-35L on a
FF. The 28-135 IS not a stellar lens; it's only quality is its IS.
--
The 17-85 and 28-135 are roughly on the same level, optically, from all
reports. And the 16-35 stopped down to the f3.5 that the 10-22 starts at
starts to look a little better in the corners. And the 10-22 really sucks
at f2.8... ;-)

Yeah, it is pretty unusable at f/2.8.

Greg