In article , Tony Cooper wrote:

Sandman:
False logic. If person A usually walks to the store
and person B suggests to use a bicycle to get there faster and
bring back more products, then the veracity of that claim
doesn't hinge on person B providing examples of his own
endevours with a bicycle. He may not even own or need a
bicycle and the claim would still remain true.

Tony Cooper:
What are "endevours" [sic] one does on a bicycle? You might try
"experiences" in that sentence, but I know you'd rather stay
with your rather odd uses of English.

Sandman:
Classic troll tactic - spelling/grammar flame instead of trying to
argue the point.

No, actually it was a word usage flame. I don't care how you
misspell it, I just wonder how one has endeavors on a bicycle.
Unless "Endeavors" is a brand name for chockladbullars. They could
be consumed on a bicycle.

What is chokladbullars [sic], troll?

Tony Cooper:
You're making all about you because - evidently
- it's improved your previously ineffective workflow so you
think everyone else must benefit by doing what you say you
do.

Sandman:
How is this "evident", Tony? nospam has said exactly
nothing about his own experience with Lightroom, or if he
even uses it.

Tony Cooper:
You're the expert at finding previously made statements. You
could find dozens that show that he uses LR.

Sandman:
Class troll misinterpretation - who claimed he didn't use
Lightroom? No one did. You made a claim that it was evident that
Lightroom had improved nospam's supposed inefficient workflow. I
asked you how that is evident, nospam has not told us about any
inefficient workflow and how - if at all - Lightroom has improved
it.

YOu just have an agenda and are trying to inject insults at every
turn.

I will admit, Popinjay, that you have brass balls when it comes to
attempting to duck and weave to avoid being caught out.

Classic troll diversion.

You said: "nospam has said exactly nothing about his own experience
with Lightroom, or if he even uses it".

In response to your specific claim about nospam's workflow. It is your
claim that is being questioned. Classic troll role-reversal.

I provided three cites - gleaned just from the last two days of
posting - where he (Oh, here's your word) substantiates that he does
use LR.

Something that has not been in question. Classic troll diversion.

You did go the sneaky route and snip the cites, and then pirouetted
around to change your statement from "if he even uses it" to "how
Lightroom has improved it". Gina Tse couldn't dance around any
better than that.

Your cite's did not substantiate your original claim, or even the
misinterpretation of my question.

Oh, and he *did* say how LR improved his workflow in one of the
cites you cowardly snipped:

Tony Cooper:
i'm getting the same (or better) results in *far* less time
with lightroom than i ever did with photoshop, and i can
still use photoshop for the occasional images that need
additional work. overall, it's a huge, huge productivity
boost.

You forgot to include a quote of nospam citing HOW it improved his
workflow.

This was not one of your better moments.

Classic role-reversal. And utterly ironic.

Why aren't you just enjoying your vacation? The weather's improved.

I am. Making fun of trolls on usenet is something I have time to do before
we go out or at night when get back.


--
Sandman[.net]