In article , Tony Cooper wrote:

Sandman:
False logic. If person A usually walks to the store and person B
suggests to use a bicycle to get there faster and bring back more
products, then the veracity of that claim doesn't hinge on person
B providing examples of his own endevours with a bicycle. He may
not even own or need a bicycle and the claim would still remain
true.

What are "endevours" [sic] one does on a bicycle? You might try
"experiences" in that sentence, but I know you'd rather stay with
your rather odd uses of English.

Classic troll tactic - spelling/grammar flame instead of trying to argue
the point.

Tony Cooper:
You're making all about you because - evidently - it's improved
your previously ineffective workflow so you think everyone else
must benefit by doing what you say you do.

Sandman:
How is this "evident", Tony? nospam has said exactly nothing about
his own experience with Lightroom, or if he even uses it.

You're the expert at finding previously made statements. You could
find dozens that show that he uses LR.

Class troll misinterpretation - who claimed he didn't use Lightroom? No one
did. You made a claim that it was evident that Lightroom had improved
nospam's supposed inefficient workflow. I asked you how that is evident,
nospam has not told us about any inefficient workflow and how - if at all -
Lightroom has improved it.

YOu just have an agenda and are trying to inject insults at every turn.


--
Sandman[.net]