Alan Browne wrote:

You are a laugh TP and skilled at twisting meanings, if little else.

You are correct that a "working photographer" who has a full time
job working for some company (eg: publication) does not need a
website. But YOU paint yourself here as a freelance or
independant photographer who is often providing stock for various
unrelated publications (calendars, etc), doing wedding and
portraits, etc. That a freelance photog of this type would not
have a website is laughable and just another indication that you
are not what you claim.

Your protests above are so much drivel and a pathetic attempt to
deceive.


Poor Alan, you really know nothing about anything related to
photography.

For your sake I hope there is something in life - unrelated to
photography - that you are good at, otherwise God help you.