View Single Post
  #24  
Old May 7th 15, 11:50 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Matching the aspect of ancient photographs.

On Thu, 07 May 2015 08:55:50 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

On 5/7/15 PDT 2:13 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2015 02:36:56 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Floyd L. Davidson wrote:

You take a wider shot and then crop. Photoshop can help you fix perspective
differences as well, but the closer you are to the same spot when you take
the pic, the better.

You can't change the perspective in post processing.

https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/perspective-warp.html
Photoshop lets you easily adjust perspective in images. This feature
is particularly useful for images having straight lines and flat
surfaces‹for example, architectural images and images of buildings.
You can also use this feature to composite objects having different
perspectives in a single image.


My experience is that this a faux change in perspective. I have tried
this on a nuber of images and found that it introduces a number of
visible distortions. DxO is noticeably better but still is not
perfect. Moral: you have to place the modern camera in the same
position as the original. Afterall it's sight lines which determine
perspective.


The best way is to determine the spot from which the original was shot,
and the focal length and aperture of the lens used at the time, and
duplicate it. Everything else is a fudge- and sometimes confection is
needed.


Focal length doesn't affect perspective. All it does is affect field
of view.

Was there a more or less standard lens and preferred focal length in the
1940's? Were they Brownie shots or large format?

--

Regards,

Eric Stevens