On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:39:55 +1200, Eric Stevens
wrote:

On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 09:52:44 +0200, android wrote:

In article ,
PeterN wrote:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09...tor_and_stuff/

I would hesitate to buy a Dell unit at any price.

Update:

Maybe I should give you this to ponder:

http://tinyurl.com/pkxnqyb

The article clears up why tinted panels goes through the Dell QC and I
can confirm this since I've observed it myself on a U2412M.
The current models have the look to produced by the same subcontractor.

I have two Dell U2410 monitors. One I bought new and is probably about
five years old. The other I bought used earlier this year and is
probably about two years old. They are basically the same monitor but
have different alphabetic suffixes (which I can't locate as yet). Both
are regularly calibrated by Spyder 4 and once they have warmed up you
can't tell one from the other. I don't know what you are bleating
about. Have you any actual experience of a properly calibrated Dell
Ultrasharp monitor?

NVidia has brought out a new Maxwell serises of graphics processors of
even higher performance. http://tinyurl.com/lfk6o6u or
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09...says_nvi dia/
is an interesting program on the application of this processor to the
reconstruction of of the contentious (allegedly shot in a studio)
photographs of the moon landing. The whole program is very interesting
(watch it in full screen mode) and will ultimately have relevance to
many aspects of digital photography. Why I mentioned it here is that
in a couple of places NVidia can be seen to using Dell U2410 monitors
for their graphic development. I don't think NVidia would be doing
that if they weren't satisfied with their quality. Watch the video
though: it's very interesting and points to the future of image
processing.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens