In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files,
thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer.

it's different in that it doesn't require a computer.

Not even the one in the camera.

more of your semantic bull**** arguments. you know quite well what is
meant by computer, and it's *not* camera.

"in the camera" I said.

that doesn't matter.

if you think otherwise, then explain how one can connect a keyboard,
mouse to the 'computer' in the camera, how to connect it to the
internet to download photoshop and then install it, and how to process
images on its tiny little 3" display.

Not even you are silly enough to think that's what I meant.

a bit extreme, but it makes the point.

As for
your idea that a computer needs a keyboard or a mouse to make it a
computer,

missing the point, as usual.

what are you going to make of an iPad, let alone the flight
systems in an Airbus?

ipads use touch instead of a mouse and there is a built in keyboard as
well as the ability to connect external keyboards.

but the real kicker is i remember you arguing several years back that
an ipad wasn't a computer. now you say it is.