DD (Rox) wrote:
In article Osf8f.3558$UF4.732@fed1read02, "Mark²" mjmorgan(lowest
even number says...
Brian Baird wrote:
In article ,
says...
Trouble with you and some of your brethren, Mark, is that you have
reading comprehension problems. You read things that are not there,
make comments that are derived from some sort of convoluted
"understanding" of the conversation, then you stomp your feet,
point your finger and act in a way that reminds me a lot of the
group mentality of unsupervised children on a playground.

See ya.

I love how you say what is true about yourself and attribute it to
Mark. Talk about misplaced blame!

Precisely.
He keeps claiming we slam Nikon, or pronounce Canon as generally
superior. I have challenged him to quote me doing that on this or
any other forum. Surprise surprise!
He hasn't, because he can't.
I have never uttered or even thought these things.
His above quote is almost funny, except that I seriously wonder if
he is aware of this significant blind-spot in his perspective.
Sometimes I think he's joking, but I fear he's quite serious. If he
is...and I think he is...then he's got some very interesting
tendencies that none of us can do anything about.

See what I mean?

It's like tapping your knee with a hammer and getting a reflex action.
Well done. Your instinctual bias and defence strategies are all
working fine.

And one only has to read your input on anything to do with Canon vs
Nikon over the years to know exactly where you stand. Your main
problem, as I see it, is that you have you head shoved so far up
Canon's ass that you have actually grown accustomed to the stink.

I feel sorry for you, Dallas.