On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:45:49 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote:


It is two separate exposures on the same frame. Which is what a digital
camera does not do, so it is not double exposure.

it's two separate exposures in the same memory, before it's written to
a raw or jpeg image, thereby making it a double exposure by any
definition.

at the end of the day, it's two clicks resulting in one image, just as
it's done with a film camera.

instead of pressing a mechanical button on the bottom to disengage the
film transport, you toggle a setting in the menu, which disengages the
memory writing.

it's also not limited to two exposures, which is why it's called
multiple exposure, and also far more capable than anything film could
do.

camera companies don't agree with your ridiculous definition.

nikon:
https://nps.nikonimaging.com/technical_solutions/d4_tips/more/img/img_09.png
https://nps.nikonimaging.com/technical_solutions/d4_tips/more/img/img_11.png



canon:
https://support-my.canon-asia.com/img/G0227382.gif
https://support-my.canon-asia.com/img/G0227383.gif
https://support-my.canon-asia.com/img/G0227386.gif

fuji:
http://fujifilm-dsc.com/en/manual/x100t/shooting/multi-exp/images/osd_sm_multi-exp00_en_x100t_320.gif

You have failed to demonstrate that multiple exposures are the same as
double exposures. Learn to write with precision.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens