On 15/01/2019 19.22, nospam wrote:
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:


Ok, so they do two frames, then merge or blend them into a single file.
That's postprocessing, not really "double exposure" in my book. It
simply emulates it, but it is not it.

are you channeling eric?

it's double exposure, without any emulation whatsoever.

It's not a double exposure it's two seperate exposures on two seperate frames.
Which is what happenes whenever you take two photos. Then they are merged
together something that doesn't happen when taking single exposures.

double exposure is always two separate exposures on two separate
frames. that's why it's called double.


Wrong.

It is two separate exposures on the same frame. Which is what a digital
camera does not do, so it is not double exposure.

End.

--
Cheers, Carlos.