View Single Post
  #19  
Old May 7th 06, 03:33 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default [OT - US/Canada] E-85

On Sat, 06 May 2006 19:57:22 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

Is there any truth to the rumor that the pollution created and energy
used in the manufacture of E85 offsets the savings?


Nope.
http://www.ilcorn.org/Ethanol/85__Et...__ethanol.html

Suggests a net 33% gain (and improving).


But the "savings" aren't there, either.
Ethanol as a motor fuel costs more than gasoline. While this might not
be reflected at the pump in the case of E-85, that would only be true
because of (IIRC) over 50¢ direct tax credit per gallon produced
(which means the pump price reflects over 50¢ less than the actual
cost).
Since ethanol contains less energy per unit, mileage goes down, too.
So, it costs more per gallon, and returns lower MPG. No savings there.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"