|
|
D7200: Speed and buffer
I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps.
The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! -- teleportation kills |
D7200: Speed and buffer
android wrote:
I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps. The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! Humor at it's worst! The Canon 1DII also cost $6000 when it came out, and was the top of Canon's pro line of DSLR's. It had 8MP and would shoot at 8 fps, with an ISO range of 100-1600. Nikon of course introduced the D2X in the same year, at a cost of only $5000. With 12 MP and also at 8 fps. But while it had more pixels the ISO range was only 100-800. The memory buffer would hold 17 of those larger RAW files, compared to the Canon 1DII holding 20 smaller files. Looks like Canon maybe was barely ahead of Nikon in 2004. In 2015 Canon hasn't moved much in a decade, and Nikon took off like a rocket! The latest Canon crop frame camera, the 7DII ranks overall at number 108 on the DXOMARK list. The current entry level bottom end from Nikon, a D3300, ranks 32! And the top Nikon APC-S, the D7100 is at 23, so we can expect the D7200 to almost certainly be at or very near the top 20 will Canon can't make the top 100. Because no doubt Nikon, unlike Canon, has indeed been able to "keep them coming". -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
D7200: Speed and buffer
On 2/03/2015 8:31 p.m., android wrote:
I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps. The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! D300 did 27 frames @ 8 FPS in 2007. The 1DII cost $4500. D300 $1799 D7200 $1199 |
D7200: Speed and buffer
|
D7200: Speed and buffer
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps. The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! Humor at it's worst! The Canon 1DII also cost $6000 when it came out, and was the top of Canon's pro line of DSLR's. It had 8MP and would shoot at 8 fps, with an ISO range of 100-1600. Nikon of course introduced the D2X in the same year, at a cost of only $5000. With 12 MP and also at 8 fps. But while it had more pixels the ISO range was only 100-800. The memory buffer would hold 17 of those larger RAW files, compared to the Canon 1DII holding 20 smaller files. Looks like Canon maybe was barely ahead of Nikon in 2004. In 2015 Canon hasn't moved much in a decade, and Nikon took off like a rocket! The latest Canon crop frame camera, the 7DII ranks overall at number 108 on the DXOMARK list. The current entry level bottom end from Nikon, a D3300, ranks 32! And the top Nikon APC-S, the D7100 is at 23, so we can expect the D7200 to almost certainly be at or very near the top 20 will Canon can't make the top 100. Because no doubt Nikon, unlike Canon, has indeed been able to "keep them coming". Well... My 1D2 wont be replaced by some Nikon halfframe! ;-) I read DxO too, but not the ranking but graphs and numbers... Everyone has different needs for a camera. Not everyone has need for the best camera. You'll do fine with your 1D2, and Grandma's family album won't be any worse because of it. The EOS M is what I have in me bag... The price is right for 1D2s now however, if you can get a good one. -- teleportation kills |
D7200: Speed and buffer
On 2015-03-02 10:26:45 +0000, android said:
In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps. The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! Humor at it's worst! The Canon 1DII also cost $6000 when it came out, and was the top of Canon's pro line of DSLR's. It had 8MP and would shoot at 8 fps, with an ISO range of 100-1600. Nikon of course introduced the D2X in the same year, at a cost of only $5000. With 12 MP and also at 8 fps. But while it had more pixels the ISO range was only 100-800. The memory buffer would hold 17 of those larger RAW files, compared to the Canon 1DII holding 20 smaller files. Looks like Canon maybe was barely ahead of Nikon in 2004. In 2015 Canon hasn't moved much in a decade, and Nikon took off like a rocket! The latest Canon crop frame camera, the 7DII ranks overall at number 108 on the DXOMARK list. The current entry level bottom end from Nikon, a D3300, ranks 32! And the top Nikon APC-S, the D7100 is at 23, so we can expect the D7200 to almost certainly be at or very near the top 20 will Canon can't make the top 100. Because no doubt Nikon, unlike Canon, has indeed been able to "keep them coming". Well... My 1D2 wont be replaced by some Nikon halfframe! ;-) I read DxO too, but not the ranking but graphs and numbers... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHYidejT3KY&list=UUZHbHSrpq6d2sd_jA3M7_bg -- Regards, Savageduck |
D7200: Speed and buffer
In article ,
Savageduck wrote: On 2015-03-02 10:26:45 +0000, android said: In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps. The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! Humor at it's worst! The Canon 1DII also cost $6000 when it came out, and was the top of Canon's pro line of DSLR's. It had 8MP and would shoot at 8 fps, with an ISO range of 100-1600. Nikon of course introduced the D2X in the same year, at a cost of only $5000. With 12 MP and also at 8 fps. But while it had more pixels the ISO range was only 100-800. The memory buffer would hold 17 of those larger RAW files, compared to the Canon 1DII holding 20 smaller files. Looks like Canon maybe was barely ahead of Nikon in 2004. In 2015 Canon hasn't moved much in a decade, and Nikon took off like a rocket! The latest Canon crop frame camera, the 7DII ranks overall at number 108 on the DXOMARK list. The current entry level bottom end from Nikon, a D3300, ranks 32! And the top Nikon APC-S, the D7100 is at 23, so we can expect the D7200 to almost certainly be at or very near the top 20 will Canon can't make the top 100. Because no doubt Nikon, unlike Canon, has indeed been able to "keep them coming". Well... My 1D2 wont be replaced by some Nikon halfframe! ;-) I read DxO too, but not the ranking but graphs and numbers... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHYidejT3KY&list=UUZHbHSrpq6d2sd_jA3M7_bg Won't waste 15' on that... -- teleportation kills |
D7200: Speed and buffer
android wrote:
In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps. The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! Humor at it's worst! The Canon 1DII also cost $6000 when it came out, and was the top of Canon's pro line of DSLR's. It had 8MP and would shoot at 8 fps, with an ISO range of 100-1600. Nikon of course introduced the D2X in the same year, at a cost of only $5000. With 12 MP and also at 8 fps. But while it had more pixels the ISO range was only 100-800. The memory buffer would hold 17 of those larger RAW files, compared to the Canon 1DII holding 20 smaller files. Looks like Canon maybe was barely ahead of Nikon in 2004. In 2015 Canon hasn't moved much in a decade, and Nikon took off like a rocket! The latest Canon crop frame camera, the 7DII ranks overall at number 108 on the DXOMARK list. The current entry level bottom end from Nikon, a D3300, ranks 32! And the top Nikon APC-S, the D7100 is at 23, so we can expect the D7200 to almost certainly be at or very near the top 20 will Canon can't make the top 100. Because no doubt Nikon, unlike Canon, has indeed been able to "keep them coming". Well... My 1D2 wont be replaced by some Nikon halfframe! ;-) I read DxO too, but not the ranking but graphs and numbers... Everyone has different needs for a camera. Not everyone has need for the best camera. You'll do fine with your 1D2, and Grandma's family album won't be any worse because of it. The EOS M is what I have in me bag... The price is right for 1D2s now however, if you can get a good one. Absent the little problem that for the money, today it is a POS. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
D7200: Speed and buffer
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: I notice that the new Nikon crop produces 18 rawfiles in buffer @ 6 fps. The Canon 1D2 also produces 18 raw in buffer but @ 8 fps. The 1D2 was introduced in 2004... Keep them coming Nikon! Humor at it's worst! The Canon 1DII also cost $6000 when it came out, and was the top of Canon's pro line of DSLR's. It had 8MP and would shoot at 8 fps, with an ISO range of 100-1600. Nikon of course introduced the D2X in the same year, at a cost of only $5000. With 12 MP and also at 8 fps. But while it had more pixels the ISO range was only 100-800. The memory buffer would hold 17 of those larger RAW files, compared to the Canon 1DII holding 20 smaller files. Looks like Canon maybe was barely ahead of Nikon in 2004. In 2015 Canon hasn't moved much in a decade, and Nikon took off like a rocket! The latest Canon crop frame camera, the 7DII ranks overall at number 108 on the DXOMARK list. The current entry level bottom end from Nikon, a D3300, ranks 32! And the top Nikon APC-S, the D7100 is at 23, so we can expect the D7200 to almost certainly be at or very near the top 20 will Canon can't make the top 100. Because no doubt Nikon, unlike Canon, has indeed been able to "keep them coming". Well... My 1D2 wont be replaced by some Nikon halfframe! ;-) I read DxO too, but not the ranking but graphs and numbers... Everyone has different needs for a camera. Not everyone has need for the best camera. You'll do fine with your 1D2, and Grandma's family album won't be any worse because of it. The EOS M is what I have in me bag... The price is right for 1D2s now however, if you can get a good one. Absent the little problem that for the money, today it is a POS. You're free to have that opinion. I won't trade it for a Nikon half frame. Larger sensors are better than smaller... -- teleportation kills |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com